The origin of the oblique-subject construction: An Indo-European comparison

Barðdal, Jóhanna; Eythórsson, Thórhallur

doi:10.1075/cilt.305.19bar

Part of

Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages: Papers presented at the workshop on Indo-European Linguistics at the XVIIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 2007
Edited by Vit Bubenik, John Hewson and Sarah Rose
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 305] 2009
► pp. 179–193

The origin of the oblique-subject construction: An Indo-European comparison

Jóhanna Barðdal

Thórhallur Eythórsson

Published online: 16 July 2009

https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.305.19bar

Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Order by:

Barðdal, Jóhanna

2018. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 1 ff.

Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thórhallur Eythórsson

2018. Chapter 11. What is a subject. In Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 257 ff.

Benedetti, Marina & Chiara Gianollo

2020. Criteria for subjecthood and non-canonical subjects in Classical Greek. In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350], ► pp. 30 ff.

Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart

2021. Evolutionary dynamics of Indo-European alignment patterns. Diachronica 38:3 ► pp. 358 ff.

Cennamo, Michela, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Jóhanna Barðdal

2015. Semantic and (morpho)syntactic constraints on anticausativization: Evidence from Latin and Old Norse-Icelandic. Linguistics 53:4

Dahl, Eystein & Chiara Fedriani

2012. The Argument Structure of Experience: Experiential Constructions in Early Vedic, Homeric Greek and Early Latin1. Transactions of the Philological Society 110:3 ► pp. 342 ff.

Haig, Geoffrey L.J.

2010. Review of Donohue & Wichmann (2008): The typology of semantic alignment. Studies in Language 34:3 ► pp. 689 ff.

Halevy, Rivka

2022. What makes the dative-experiencer construction in Modern Hebrew different from its counterparts in European languages?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:3 ► pp. 379 ff.

Hintze, A.

2017. Avestan Research 1991–2017, Part 2.. Kratylos 62:1 ► pp. 1 ff.

Malchukov, Andrej L.

2018. Chapter 10. Forty years in the search of a/the subject. In Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 241 ff.

Pat-El, Na'ama

2018. Chapter 7. The diachrony of non-canonical subjects in Northwest Semitic. In Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series, 200], ► pp. 155 ff.

Pooth, Roland & Verónica Orqueda

2021. Alignment Change and the Emergence of the Thematic Conjugation from Proto‐Indo‐European to Indo‐European: A Wedding of Hypotheses*. Transactions of the Philological Society 119:2 ► pp. 107 ff.

Rodríguez-Abruñeiras, Paula

2022. “Me likey!” A new (old) argument structure or a partially fixed expression with the verb like?. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 237 ff.

Smitherman, Thomas

2015. Reconstructing non-canonical argument structure for Proto-Indo-European. In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169], ► pp. 93 ff.

Teffeteller, Annette

2015. Anatolian morphosyntax. In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169], ► pp. 155 ff.

Viti, Carlotta

2017. Semantic and cognitive factors of argument marking in ancient Indo-European languages. Diachronica 34:3 ► pp. 368 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.