Cover not available
Part of
Exaptation and Language Change
Edited by Muriel Norde and Freek Van de Velde
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336] 2016
► pp. 57–92

Co-opting exaptation in a theory of language change

In contrast with exaptation, which has been widely discussed over the last years, its conceptual counterpart in evolutionary biology, namely adaptation, does not seem to play any significant role in the actual linguistic debate. In the paper, the attempt is made to integrate this conceptual pair into our linguistic epistemology basically extending Lindblom’s (1998) model of adaptive changes beyond the domain of phonological change. In this light, adaptive changes are characterized as oriented and responding to a general design of economy and plasticity, while exaptive changes are normally non-oriented and result from the refunctionalization of (partially pre-adapted) linguistic material.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Exaptation as the counterpart of grammaticalization
    • 1.2Accommodating exaptation into a theory of language change
  • 2.Adaptation and exaptation in an evolutionary approach
  • 3.The role of adaptation in language change
    • 3.1Towards an adaptive model of language change
    • 3.2Modeling phonological change in adaptive terms
    • 3.3Extending the adaptive model beyond phonological change
  • 4.Exaptation as the counterpart of adaptation
    • 4.1Exaptive changes in phonology
    • 4.2Exaptive changes in syntax
    • 4.3Exaptive changes in mophology
      • 4.3.1From inflection to derivation
      • 4.3.2Spandrels?
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.336.03gae
References (71)
References
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical Plurals: A morphosemantic approach. (= Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, 20.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1973. “Abductive and Deductive Change”. Language 49:4.567–595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Actualization and the (Uni)directionality of Change. Actualization: Linguistic change in progress ed. by Henning Andersen, 225–248. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 219.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Synchrony, Diachrony and Evolution”. Competing Models of Linguistic Change: Evolution and beyond ed. by Ole Nedergaard Thomsen (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 279.), 59–90.Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman & Tom Schoenemann. 2009. “Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position paper”. Language Learning 59:1.1–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bock, Walter J. 1959. “Preadaptation and Multiple Evolutionary Pathways”. Evolution 13:2.194–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Dieter Stein. 1995. “Functional Renewal”. Historical Linguistics 1993: Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993 ed. by Henning Andersen (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 124.), 32–47. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Clackson, James. 2007. Indo-European Linguistics: An introduction. (= Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining Language Change: An evolutionary approach. (= Longman Linguistics Library) London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2006. “The Relevance of an Evolutionary Model to Historical Linguistics”. Competing Models of Linguistic Change: Evolution and beyond ed. by Ole Nedergaard Thomsen (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 279.), 91–132. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 2001. “Inflationary Effects in Language and Elsewhere”. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure ed. by Joan Bybee & Paul Hopper, 471–480. (= Typological Studies in Language, 45.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1872. The Origin of Species. 6th ed. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
De Cuypere, Ludovic. 2005. “Exploring Exaptation in Language Change”. Folia Linguistica Historica 26.13–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. 1995. Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Donegan, Patricia & David Stampe. 1979. “The Study of Natural Phonology”. Current Approaches to Phonological Theory ed. by Daniel Dinnsen, 126–173. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan T. 2010. “Word Order”. The Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics ed. by Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik, 201–211. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio. 2002. “Umlaut Extension in German Modals as Natural Change”. Diachronica 19:1.1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. “Exploring Grammaticalization from Below”. What Makes Grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components ed. by Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer, 45–75. (= Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 158.) Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Action Nouns in Romance”. Word-Formation: An international handbook of the languages of Europe ed. by Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer, vol. II, 1165–1185. (= Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science, 40.2.) Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna. 1998. “Testing the Boundaries of Grammaticalization”. The Limits of Grammaticalization ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper, 107–127. (= Typological Studies in Language, 37.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2009. The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. & Richard C. Lewontin. 1979. “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 205.581–598.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen J. & Elisabeth S. Vrba. 1982. “Exaptation – A missing term in the science of form”. Paleobiology 8.4–15.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1991. “The Last Stages of Grammatical Elements: Contractive and expansive desemanticization”. Approaches to Grammaticalization ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine, vol. I, 301–314. (= Typological Studies in Language, 19.1.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. (= Research Surveys in Linguistics) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagège, Claude & André Haudricourt. 1978. La phonologie panchronique. (= le linguiste, 20.) Paris: puf.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. “The Diachronic Externalization of Inflection”. Linguistics 31:2.279–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. “Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible?”. Linguistics 37:6.1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2002. “On the Role of Context in Grammaticalization”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 83–101. (= Typological Studies in Language, 49.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. “On Degrammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 2001 ed. by Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge, 163–179. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 237.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2007. The Genesis of Grammar: A reconstruction. (= Studies in the Evolution of Language, 9.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland & Svetlana Petrova. 2010. “From V1 to V2 in West Germanic”. Lingua 120.315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hock, Hans Heinrich. 2010. “Typology and Universals”. The Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics ed. by Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik, 56–69. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul. 1987. “Emergent Grammar”. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: General session and parasession on grammar and cognition ed. by Jon Aske, Natasha Berry, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip, 139–157. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization: Second edition. (= Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. “Linguistics in Relation to Other Sciences”. Selected Writings, vol. II, 655–696. The Hague & Paris: Mouton (Orig. in Main Trends of Research in the Social and Human Sciences, Paris & The Hague: Mouton-UNESCO, 1970).Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian. 2005. “How Accommodating of Change is Grammaticalization? The case of ‘lateral shifts’”. Logos and Language 6:2.1–7.Google Scholar
Keller, Rudi. 1994. Sprachwandel. Von der unsichtbaren Hand in der Sprache. 2nd ed. (= UTB für Wissenschaft / Uni-Taschenbücher, 1567.) Tübingen & Basel: Francke.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1988. “Phonological Change”. Linguistics: The Cambridge survey ed. by Frederick J. Newmeyer, vol. I, 363–415. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klausenburger, Jürgen. 2000. Grammaticalization: Studies in Latin and Romance morphosyntax. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 193) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, Greger, Philip A. Stephens, Jamshid J. Tehrani & Robert H. Layton. 2013. “Exapting Exaptation”. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28:9.497–498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. “How to Do Things with Junk: Exaptation in language evolution”. Journal of Linguistics 26.79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. (= Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 81.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazzeroni, Romano. 1998. “Fonomorfogenesi”. Sintassi storica: Atti del XXX Congresso della Società di Linguistica Italiana ed. by Paolo Ramat & Elisa Roma, 75–82. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1992. “Word Order Change by Grammaticalization”. Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change ed. by Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein, 395–416. (= Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 61.) The Hague & Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2002. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. 2nd rev. ed. Erfurt: Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt.Google Scholar
Liebal, Kristin, Malinda Carpenter & Michael Tomasello. 2011. “Young Children’s Understanding of Markedness in Non-Verbal Communication”. Journal of Child Language 38.888–903. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1988. “Phonetic Invariance and the Adaptive Nature of Speech”. Working Models of Human Perception ed. by Ben A.G. Elsedoorn & Herman Bouma, 139–173. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1998. “Systemic Constraints and Adaptive Change in the Formation of Sound Structure”. Approaches to the Evolution of Language ed. by James R. Hurford, Michael Studdert-­Kennedy & Chris Knight, 242–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn, Susan Guion, Susan Hura, Seung-Jae Moon & Raquel Willerman. 1995. “Is Sound Change Adaptive?”. Rivista di Linguistica 7:1.5–37.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn & Ian Maddieson. 1988. “Phonetic Universals in Consonant Systems”. Language, Speech and Mind: Studies in honour of Victoria A. Fromkin ed. by Charles N. Li & Larry M. Hyman, 62–78. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2013. “Recycling “Junk”: A case for exaptation as a response to breakdown”. Historical Linguistics 2011: Selected papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka 25–30 July 2011 ed. by Ritsuko Kikusawa & Lawrence A. Reid, 267–288. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 326) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2010. “The Rise (and Possibly Downfall) of Configurationality”. The Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics ed. by Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik, 212–229. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Maslova, Elena. 2008. “Unidirectionality of Grammaticalization in an Evolutionary Perspective”. Studies on Grammaticalization ed. by Elisabeth Verhoeven, Stavros Skopeteas, Yong-Min Shin, Yoko Nishina & Johannes Helmbrecht, 15–24. (= Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 205.) Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1912. “L’évolution des formes grammaticales”. Scientia (Rivista di scienza) 12.384–400. (Reprinted in Antoine Meillet, Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, Paris: Champion, 1948, 130–148).Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles. 1986. “On the Morphologization of Word-Final Consonant Deletion in French”. Sandhi Phenomena in the Languages of Europe ed. by Henning Andersen, 167–210. (= Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs, 33.) Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John. 1988. “Discussion of Björn Lindblom’s ‘Phonetic Invariance and the Adaptive Nature of Speech’”. Working Models of Human Perception ed. by Ben A.G. Elsedoorn & Herman Bouma, 175–183. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. “The Phonetics of Sound Change”. Historical Linguistics: Problems and perspectives ed. by Charles Jones, 237–278. (= Longman Linguistics Library) London: Longman.Google Scholar
Parlato-Oliveira, Erika, Anne Christophe, Yuki Hirose & Emmanuel Dupoux. 2010. “Plasticity of Illusory Vowel Perception in Brazilian-Japanese Bilinguals”. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 127:6.3738–3748. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pievani, Telmo. 2005. Introduzione alla Filosofia della Biologia. (= Biblioteca di Cultura Moderna, 1179.) Bari & Roma: Laterza.Google Scholar
Pievani, Telmo & Emanuele Serrelli. 2011. “Exaptation in Human Evolution: How to test adaptive vs exaptive evolutionary hypotheses”. Journal of Anthropological Sciences 89.1–15.Google Scholar
Simon, Horst J. 2010. ““Exaptation” in der Sprachwandeltheorie. Eine Begriffspräzisierung”. Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 41–57. (= Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen, 37.) Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smith, John Charles. 2006. “How to Do Things Without Junk: The refunctionalization of a pronominal subsystem between Latin and Romance”. New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics: Selected papers from the 35th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages ed. by Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil, vol. II, 183–205. (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 276.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sun, Chaofen & Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2011. “Grammaticalization and Word Order Change”. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization ed. by Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, 378–388. (= Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Szczepaniak, Renata. 2009. Grammatikalisierung im Deutschen: Eine Einführung. (= Narr Studienbücher) Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 2000. “From Quantity to Syllable Cuts: On so-called lengthening in the Germanic languages”. Rivista di Linguistica 12:1.251–282.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1995. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 1993: Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993 ed. by Henning Andersen (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 124.), 433–445. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, Heide. 2008. “The Regrammaticalization of Linking Elements in German”. Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization ed. by Elena Seoane & María José López-­Couso, 333–354. (= Typological Studies in Language, 77.) Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang U. 1989. Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. (= Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9.) Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Pérez-Guerra, Javier
2022. Determinants of exaptation in Verb-Object predicates in the transition from Late Middle English to Early Modern English. In Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 105], ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo
Ritt, Nikolaus, Andreas Baumann, Eva Zehentner & Alexandra Zöpfl
2020. Reconsidering subjectification from the perspective of animal signalling. Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 2:2 ► pp. 138 ff. DOI logo
Gaeta, Livio
2019. Chapter 9. Anti-relevant, contra-iconic but system-adequate. In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348], ► pp. 172 ff. DOI logo
Gaeta, Livio
2020. Remotivating inflectional classes. In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350], ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Gaeta, Livio
2022. Chapter 1. Dangerous liaisons. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.