Cover not available
Part of
Exaptation and Language Change
Edited by Muriel Norde and Freek Van de Velde
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336] 2016
► pp. 93–120

Exaptation in Japanese and beyond

An increasing amount of specific phenomena have been identified as exaptation in a variety of languages, but mainly of the Indo-European stock, and mainly concentrating on a specific example of the phenomenon. Furthermore, there is considerable disagreement about how the concept should be applied in the study of language change. The purpose of this paper is to (1) present a (hopefully) useful version of the concept, and (2) shed light on our understanding of exaptation by putting the focus on a historically relatively well-documented language from a different corner of the world, namely Japanese. Based on a database of grammaticalization-related changes, I will try to give an overview of exaptation phenomena across the board in this language. In this manner we arrive at some generalizations across exaptations based on empirical facts, and also get an idea of how exaptation tallies up against grammaticalization. Finally, these generalizations are reflected in an attempt at a general conceptualization of exaptation vis-à-vis grammaticalization.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction – exaptation vis-à-vis grammaticalization
  • 2.Regular course of grammaticalization in Japanese
  • 3.Exaptation in Japanese
    • 3.1Case I: From transitive to causative
    • 3.2Case II: From spontaneous -(r)(a)ye- and intransitive -are-to passive -(r)are- in Old Japanese
    • 3.3Case III: From intransitive -e- to the Potential -(r)e-
    • 3.4Other cases of phonological accretion in Japanese verb morphology
    • 3.5Case IV: rasi- from noun ending denoting similarity to evidential marker
    • 3.6Case V: The conjunctive particle keredo(=mo)
    • 3.7Case VI: The conjunctive particle si
    • 3.8Borderline cases of exaptation: The conjunctive suffixes -Tari and -tu…-tu
  • 4.Summary and generalizations
  • 5.The larger picture
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 February 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.336.04nar
References (63)
References
Andersen, Henning. 2006. “Grammation, Regrammation, and Degrammation: Tense loss in Russian”. Diachronica 23:2.231–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoki, Hiroshi. 1996. “Kanō dōshi no seiritsu ni tsuite [About the genesis of the potential verbs]”. Gobun Kenkyū 81.1–13.Google Scholar
Boechx, Cedric. 2010. “Linguistic Minimalism”. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis ed. by Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog, 485–505. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
García García, Luisa. 2005. Germanische Kausativbildung: Die deverbalen jan-Verben im Gotischen. Heidelberg: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna. 1998. “Testing the Boundaries of Grammaticalization”. The Limits of Grammaticalization (= Typological Studies in Language, 37) ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper, 107–127. Amsterdam & Philadephia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity. Diachrony, Ontogeny, Neuro-Cognition, Evolution. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1991. “The Last Stages of Grammatical Elements: Contractive and expansive desemanticization”. Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. 1 (= Typological Studies in Language, 19) ed. by Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine, 301–314. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harnisch, Rüdiger. 2004. “Verstärkungsprozesse. Zu einer Theorie der ‘Sekretion’ und des ‘Re-konstruktionellen Ikonismus’”. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 32.210–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Zu einer Typologie sprachlicher Verstärkungsprozesse”. Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 3–23. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. “Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible?” Linguistics 37, 1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2004. “On Genetic Motivation in Grammar”. Studies in Linguistic Motivation (= Cognitive Linguistics Research, 28) ed. by Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther, 103–120. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Mechthild Reh. 1984. Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Itoi, Michihiro. 2001. “Keredo. Setsuzokushi [ Keredo. A conjunction]”. Nihongo Bunpō Daijiten ed. by Akiho Yamaguchi & Morihide Akimoto, 238. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Jamison, Stephanie. 1976. “Functional Ambiguity and Syntactic Change”. Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax April 1976, 126–135. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. 1983. Function and Form in the -áya-Formations of the Rig Veda and Atharva Veda. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. 1996. Back from the Brink. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, origin and development. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 2001. “Is there such a Thing as ‘Grammaticalization?’” Language Sciences 23.163–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. “Rescuing Traditional (Historical) Linguistics from Grammaticalization Theory”. Up and down the Cline – The nature of grammaticalization ed. by Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon, 45–71. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005. “Greek Verb Endings: ‘Lateral shifts’ and grammaticalization”. Presentation at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 3, 17–20 July 2005, Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. Middle Voice. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne & Arie Verhagen. 1994. “The Grammar of Causatives and the Conceptual Structure of Events”. Cognitive Linguistics 5/2.115–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinsui, Satoshi. 2003. “ Ra-nuki kotoba no rekishiteki kenkyū [Historical research on ra-nuki verbs]”. Gekkan gengo 32/4.56–62.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English Modals. A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. “How to Do Things with Junk: Exaptation in language evolution”. Journal of Linguistics 26.79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1989. “Grammatikalisierung und Lexikalisierung”. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42.11–19.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 1976. “Lahu Causative Constructions: Case hierarchies and the morphology/syntax cycle in a Tibeto-Burman perspective”. Syntax and Semantics Vol. 6 ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani, 413–442. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 2002. “An Invisible Hand at the Root of Causation: The role of lexicalization in the grammaticalization of causatives”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 237–258. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Grammaticalization and explanation”. The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization ed. by Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, 177–192. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 1999. Japanische Verbflexive und flektierbare Verbalsuffixe. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2004. “From Transitive to Causative in Japanese: Morphologization through exaptation”. Diachronica 21:2.351–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Nihongo no bunpōka no keitaironteki sokumen [The morphological aspect of grammaticalization in Japanese]”. Nihongo no kenkyū 1/3.108–122.Google Scholar
. 2007a. “Exaptation, Grammaticalization, and Reanalysis”. California Linguistic Notes 32 (1).Google Scholar
. 2007b. “Nihongo no jita dōshi-tsui no rukeironteki ichi-duke [The typological position of Japanese transitivity pairs]”. Lexicon Forum 3.161–193.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Voice and Non-canonical Marking in the Expression of Event-oriented Modality: A cross-linguistic study”. Linguistic Typology 14:1.71–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Modality, Subjectivity, and Semantic Change. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming. “Japanese Transitivity Pairs through Time: A historical and typological perspective”. Transitivity and Valency Alternations: Japanese and Beyond (= Topics in Linguistics – Studies and Monographs) ed. by Taro Kageyama & Wesley M. Jacobsen. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nichols, Johanna, David A. Peterson & Jonathan Barnes. 2004. “Transitivizing and Detransitivizing Languages”. Linguistic Typology 8.149–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
NKD = Nihon Kokugo Daijiten [Great Dictionary of the Japanese Language], vol. 6. Second edition. 2006. Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okada, Judy. 2004. “Causative Sa-Insertion in Japanese: Verbal and sentential patterns”. Nihongo Bunpō 4:2.69–88.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Morpheme Insertions in Japanese Causative and Potential Expressions”. Japanese Korean Linguistics 13.347–358.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Eric. 1991. “The Ecology of Semantic Space”. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society . 457–468.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine. 2007. “The Causative-Passive in the Trans-Eurasian Languages”. Turkic Languages 11:2.235–278.Google Scholar
Sakanashi, Ryūzō. 1994. “Kanō dōshi no hattatsu [The development of potential verbs]”. Gengo Jōhō Kagaku Senkō Kiyō 1:1.128–142.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Edo kōki no kanō dōshi [Potential verbs in the late Edo period]”. Kokugo to Kokubungaku 1:1995. 1–15.Google Scholar
Sakazume, Rikiji. 2010. “Chōgonkashō ni mieru maikeredomo o megutte. Setsuzoku joshi keredomo no seiritsu-setsu o kenshō suru [About maikeredomo in the Chōgonkashō. An investigation into hypotheses about the genesis of the conjunctive particle keredomo ]”. Kindaigo Kenkyū 15.53–64.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1997. “Gengo no kinō to kōzō to ruikei [Functions of language, structure and typology]”. Gengo Kenkyu 112.1–32.Google Scholar
Simon, Horst. 2010. “‘Exaptation’ in der Sprachwandeltheorie. Eine Begriffspräzisierung.” Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung (= Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen, 37) ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 41–57. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smith, J.C. 2006. “How to Do Things without Junk: The refunctionalization of a pronominal subsystem between Latin and Romance”. New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics. Volume II: Phonetics, phonology and dialectology ed. by J.-P.Y. Montreuil, 183–205. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suga, Kazuyoshi & Emiko Hayatsu. 1995. “Dōshi no jita o minaosu tame ni [Taking a new look at transitive-intransitive alternations]”. Dōshi no Jita ed. by Kazuyoshi Suga & Emiko Hayatsu, 207–231. Tokyo: Hitsuji Shobō.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hideo. 1994. “ Ra-nuke kotoba [ Ra-nuke words]”. Kokubungaku Kaishaku to Kanshō 1994:7.67–76.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2004. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Linguistic Studies based on Corpora ed. by M. Akimoto, 133–156. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek, Hendrik De Smet & Lobke Ghesquière. 2013. “On Multiple Source Constructions in Language Change”. Studies in Language 37:3.473–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vincent, N. 1995. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 1993 (= Current Issues In Linguistic Theory, 124) ed. by Henning Andersen, 433–445. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, David. 2007. “Syntactic lexicalization as a new type of degrammaticalization”. Linguistics 45:2.271–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Degrammaticalization and Obsolescent Morphology. Evidence from Slavonic”. Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (= Studies in Language Companion Series, 119) ed. by Ekaterini Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König, 151–178. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2010. “Sekretion und Exaptation als Mechanismen in der Wortbildung und Grammatik”. Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung (= Linguistik – Impulse & Tendenzen, 37) ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 29–40. Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yuzawa, Kōkichirō. 1957. Zōtei Edo Kotoba no Kenkyū [Research on the Edo language] (expanded and revised version). Tōkyō: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Cited by (28)

Cited by 28 other publications

Narrog, Heiko
2020. Historical change in the Japanese tense-aspect system. Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Narrog, Heiko
2022. Historical change in the Japanese tense-aspect system. In Development of Tense and Aspect Systems [Benjamins Current Topics, 123], ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, DOI logo
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2018. Areal diffusion and the limits of grammaticalization. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
Ansaldo, Umberto, Walter Bisang & Pui Yiu Szeto
2018. Grammaticalization in isolating languages and the notion of complexity. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Arkadiev, Peter & Timur Maisak
2018. Grammaticalization in the North Caucasian languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 116 ff. DOI logo
Coupe, Alexander R.
2018. Grammaticalization processes in the languages of South Asia. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Dahl, Östen
2018. Grammaticalization in the languages of Europe. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Esseesy, Mohssen
2018. Typological features of grammaticalization in Semitic. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Haig, Geoffrey
2018. Grammaticalization and inflectionalization in Iranian. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2018. Revisiting the anasynthetic spiral. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2018. Grammaticalization in Africa. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 16 ff. DOI logo
Johanson, Lars & Éva Á. Csató
2018. Grammaticalization in Turkic. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 146 ff. DOI logo
Klamer, Marian
2018. Typology and grammaticalization in the Papuan languages of Timor, Alor, and Pantar. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
McWhorter, John H.
2018. Is grammaticalization in creoles different?. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 394 ff. DOI logo
Mithun, Marianne
2018. Shaping typology through grammaticalization: North America. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2018. Grammaticalization in Oceanic languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Mushin, Ilana
2018. Grammaticalization and typology in Australian Aboriginal languages. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine
2018. Introduction. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine
2018. Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, DOI logo
Narrog, Heiko, Seongha Rhee & John Whitman
2018. Grammaticalization in Japanese and Korean. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Smith, Hiram L.
2018. Addressing questions of grammaticalization in creoles. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 372 ff. DOI logo
Van de Velde, Freek
2018. Iterated Exaptation. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Zariquiey, Roberto
2018. Diachronic stories of body-part nouns in some language families of South America. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. 350 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Preface. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. viii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Series preface. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. Copyright Page. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2018. List of abbreviations. In Grammaticalization from a Typological Perspective, ► pp. ix ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.