Part of
Exaptation and Language Change
Edited by Muriel Norde and Freek Van de Velde
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 336] 2016
► pp. 197225
References (87)
Texts cited
Betha Colaim Chille, Life of Colum Cille, Compiled by Manus O’Donnell in 1532 ed. by A. O’Kelleher and G. Schoepperle. Urbana: University of Illinois, 1918.Google Scholar
The Book of Leinster, Formerly Lebar na Núachongbála ed. by R.I. Best, Osborn Bergin, M. A. O’Brien and Anne O’Sullivan. 6 vols. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, 1954–83.Google Scholar
“Bulgarian National Corpus”. Sofia: Institute for Bulgarian Language, 2009–2014, [URL].
Suprasălski ili Retkov Sbornik ed. by Jordan Zaimov and Mario Kapaldo. Sofia: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata Akademija na Naukite, 1982. [ Codex Suprasliensis ]Google Scholar
A dictionary of the Old-Irish glosses in the Milan Codex Ambrosianus C 301 inf.” ed. by Aaron Griffith and David Stifter. [URL]. [ Milan glosses ]
The Evernew Tongue” ed. by Whitley Stokes. Ériu 2.96–162. [ Tenga Bithnúa ]
References
Adger, David & Jennifer Smith. 2005. “Variation and the Minimalist Program”. Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the biological and the social ed. by Leonie Cornips & Karen P. Corrigan (= Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 265), 149–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Variation in Agreement: A lexical feature-based approach”. Lingua 120.1109–1134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allen, Cynthia L. 2003. “Deflexion and the Development of the Genitive in English”. English Language and Linguistics 7.1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Genitives in Early English: Typology and evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 1973. “Abductive and Deductive Change”. Language 49.765–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Grammation, Regrammation, and Degrammation: Tense loss in Russian”. Diachronica 23.231–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Grammaticalization in a Speaker-oriented Theory of Change”. Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory: The Rosendal papers ed. by Thórhallur Eythórsson, 11–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2001. “ Was/were-variation in Non-standard British English Today”. English World-Wide 22.1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börjars, Kersti. 2003. “Morphological Status and (De)grammaticalisation: The Swedish possessive”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26.133–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2000. The Structure of Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Britain, David. 2002. “Diffusion, Levelling, Simplification and Reallocation in Past Tense BE in the English Fens”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6.16–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burridge, Kate. 1998. “From Modal Auxiliary to Lexical Verb: The curious case of Pennsylvania German wotte ”. Historical Linguistics 1995: Selected papers from the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, August 1995 ed. by Richard M. Hogg & Linda van Bergen, vol. II, 19–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J.K. 2004. “Dynamic Typology and Vernacular Universals”. Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect grammar from a crosslinguistic perspective ed. by Bernd Kortmann, 127–145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny & Sue Fox. 2009. “ Was/were Variation: A perspective from London”. Language Variation and Change 21.1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. 2009. Natural Language Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof. 1999. “Review Essay, Muriel Norde: The history of the genitive in Swedish. A case study in degrammaticalization [doctoral dissertation], 1997”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22.77–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “The Swedish Genitive: A reply to Norde”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24.119–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Aidan. 2002. “Yesterday’s Affixes as Today’s Clitics”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 67–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne & Dag Haug. 2009. “Aligning Syntax in Early New Testament Texts: The PROIEL Corpus”. Diachronic Slavonic Syntax: Gradual changes in focus ed. by Björn Hansen & Jasmina Grković-Major, 41–51. Munich: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 1999. Lexical Strata in English: Morphological causes, phonological effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greene, David. 1958. “The Analytic Form of the Verb in Irish”. Ériu 18.108–112.Google Scholar
. 1973. “Synthetic and Analytic: A reconsideration”. Ériu 24.121–133.Google Scholar
Haas, Nynke de. 2008. “The Origins of the Northern Subject Rule”. English Historical Linguistics 2006: Selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006 ed. by Marina Dossena, Richard Dury & Maurizio Gotti, 111–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo.Google Scholar
. 2011. Morphosyntactic Variation in Northern English: The Northern Subject Rule, its origins and early history. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Lyle Campbell. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2002. “From Speech Perception to Morphology: Affix order revisited”. Language 78.527–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Ingo Plag. 2004. “What Constrains Possible Suffix Combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22.565–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. “On Degrammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 2001: Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001 ed. by Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge, 163–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. 2007. “Diachronic Tendencies in Historical Phonology: The case of ‘secondary contractions’ in northern English”. Paper presented at the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal.
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003 [1993]. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Isaac, Graham. 2003. “Diagnosing the Symptoms of Contact: Some Celtic-English case histories”. The Celtic Englishes III ed. by Hildegard L.C. Tristram, 46–64. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1922. Language: Its nature, development and origin. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 2012. “Grammaticalization as Optimization”. Grammatical Change: Origins, nature, outcomes ed. by Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett, 15–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klemola, Juhani. 2000. “The Origins of the Northern Subject Rule: A case of early contact?The Celtic Englishes II ed. by Hildegard L.C. Tristram, 329–346. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Kuzmack, Stefanie. 2007. “ Ish: A new case of antigrammaticalization”. Ms., University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1977. “Syntactic Reanalysis”. Mechanisms of Syntactic Change ed. by Charles N. Li, 57–139. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. “How to do Things with Junk: Exaptation in language evolution”. Journal of Linguistics 26.79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. “Phonology and Morphology”. The Cambridge History of the English Language: Volume II, 1066–1476 ed. by Norman Blake, 23–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahon, William. 1993. “First plural mar in Connacht Irish”. Éigse 27.81–88.Google Scholar
McCafferty, Kevin. 2003. “The Northern Subject Rule in Ulster: How Scots, how English?Language Variation and Change 15.105–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo. 1988. “From Bound Grammatical Markers to Free Discourse Markers: History of some Japanese connectives”. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 340–351.Google Scholar
Matushansky, Ora. 2002. “More of a Good Thing: Russian synthetic and analytic comparatives”. Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The second Ann Arbor meeting, 2001 ed. by Jindřich Toman, 143–162. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen M. 2011. “Bilingual Language Acquisition and Theories of Diachronic Change: Bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change”. Bilingualism 14.121–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2004. “From Transitive to Causative in Japanese”. Diachronica 21.351–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Exaptation, Grammaticalization, and Reanalysis”. California Linguistic Notes 32.1–25.Google Scholar
Nilsen, K. 1974. “A New Third Person Plural Subject pronoun”. Éigse 15.114–116.Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 1998. “Grammaticalization versus Reanalysis: The case of possessive constructions in Germanic”. Historical linguistics 1995: Selected papers from the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Manchester, August 1995 ed. by Richard M. Hogg & Linda van Bergen, 211–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001a. “Deflexion as a Counterdirectional Factor in Grammatical Change”. Language Sciences 23.231–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. “The History of the Swedish Genitive: The full story”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24.107–118. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. “The Final Stages of Grammaticalization: Affixhood and beyond”. New Reflections on Grammaticalization ed. by Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald, 45–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. “Demarcating Degrammaticalization: The Swedish s-genitive revisited”. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 29.201–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Grammaticalization: Three common controversies”. Grammaticalization: Current views and issues ed. by Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König, 123–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ó Buachalla, Breandán. 1970. “ Muinn ‘we’ in Southeast Ulster”. Éigse 13.31–49.Google Scholar
Petyt, K.M. 1978. “Secondary Contraction in West Yorkshire Negatives”. Sociolinguistic Patterns ed. by Peter Trudgill, 91–100. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Pietsch, Lukas. 2005. “‘Some Do and Some Doesn’t’: Verbal concord variation in the north of the British Isles”. A Comparative Grammar of British English Dialects: Agreement, gender, relative clauses ed. by Bernd Kortmann, Tanja Hermann, Lukas Pietsch & Susanne Wagner, 125–210. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plank, Franz. 1995. “Entgrammatisierung: Spiegelbild der Grammatisierung?Natürlichkeitstheorie und Sprachwandel ed. by Norbert Boretzky & Andreas Bittner, 199–219. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian G. 1993. “A Formal Account of Grammaticalisation in the History of Romance Futures”. Folia Linguistica Historica 13.219–258.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian G. & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic Change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roma, Elisa. 2000. “How Subject Pronouns Spread in Irish: A diachronic study and synchronic account of the third person + pronoun pattern”. Ériu 51.107–157.Google Scholar
Schilling-Estes, Natalie & Walt Wolfram. 1994. “Convergent Explanation and Alternative Regularization Patterns: Were/weren’t levelling in a vernacular English variety”. Language Variation and Change 6.273–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Horst J. 2010. “‘Exaptation’ in der Sprachwandeltheorie: Eine Begriffspräzisierung”. Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung: Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 41–57. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sussex, Roland & Paul Cubberley. 2006. The Slavic Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 1998. “ Was/were Variation across the Generations: View from the city of York”. Language Variation and Change 10.153–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1946. A Grammar of Old Irish. Dublin: Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Toner, Gregory, Grigory Bondarenko & Sharon Arbuthnot. 2013. “Electronic Dictionary of the Irish Language”, [URL].
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2004. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Linguistic Studies based on Corpora ed. by Minoji Akimoto, 133–156. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme & Muriel Norde. 2013. “Degrammaticalization and Constructionalization: Two case studies”. Language Sciences 36.32–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1995. “Exaptation and Grammaticalization”. Historical Linguistics 1993: Selected papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993 ed. by Henning Andersen, 433–445. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, N.J.A. 1968. “ Muinn ‘we’ in Southeast Ulster”. Éigse 12.297–300.Google Scholar
Willis, David. 2007. “Syntactic Lexicalization as a New Type of Degrammaticalization”. Linguistics 45.271–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Old and Middle Welsh”. The Celtic Languages ed. by Martin Ball & Nicole Müller, 117–160. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Degrammaticalization and Obsolescent Morphology: Evidence from Slavonic”. Grammaticalization: Current views and issues ed. by Katerina Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König, 151–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. “The History of Negation in the Brythonic Celtic Languages”. The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, Volume 1: Case studies ed. by David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth, 239–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2013b. “The History of Negation in the Slavonic languages”. The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, Volume 1: Case studies ed. by David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth, 341–398. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2010. “Sekretion und Exaptation als Mechanismen in der Wortbildung und Grammatik”. Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung: Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung ed. by Rüdiger Harnisch, 29–40. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 1983. “Cliticization vs. Inflection: English -n’t ”. Language 59.502–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

D’Antuono, Nicola
2024. From Latin QUO(D) VELLES to Romagnol Cvël: A Case of Degrammaticalisation from a Free‐choice Indefinite to the Noun ‘Thing’1. Transactions of the Philological Society 122:1  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. The verb. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. 258 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Nouns and adjectives. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Word formation in diachrony. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. 383 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Determiners and the deictic system. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Conclusion. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. 474 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Pronominal and indefinite structures. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. 140 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Possessives. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uță Bărbulescu & Rodica Zafiu
2021. Introduction. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin, Adina Dragomirescu, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Oana Uţă & Rodica Zafiu
2021. The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology, DOI logo
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Introduction. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Verbal –s. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme,  pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Rupp, Laura & David Britain
2019. Past BE. In Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme,  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Van de Velde, Freek
2018. Iterated Exaptation. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4],  pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Willis, David
2017. Degrammaticalization. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax,  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Copyright Page. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Abbreviations, symbols, journal acronyms, and other conventions. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. xv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Preface. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Textual sources. In The Oxford History of Romanian Morphology,  pp. 479 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.