References (42)
References [original 1972]
Allen, W. Sidney. 1965. Vox Latina. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1968. Vox Graeca. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1969. The Latin accent: A restatement. Journal of Linguistics 5: 193–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John. 1969. Syllabic or non-syllabic phonology? Journal of Linguistics 5: 136–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bondarko, L. V. 1969. The syllable structure of speech and distinctive features of phonemes. Phonetica 20: 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cairns, Charles E. 1971. Review of Syllable, Word, Nexus, Cursus, by Ernst Pulgram. Language Sciences [Indiana] 18: 39–44.Google Scholar
Cheng, R. L. 1966. Mandarin phonological structure. Journal of Linguistics 2: 137–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fleisch, Henri. 1956. L’Arabe classique: Esquisse d’une structure linguistique. Beirut: Imprimerie Catholique.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria. 1970. The concept of ‘naturalness’ in a universal phonetic theory. Glossa 4: 29–45.Google Scholar
Fudge, E. C. 1969. Syllables. Journal of Linguistics 5: 253–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hála, Bohuslav. 1961. La syllabe: sa nature, son origine et ses transformations. Orbis 10: 69–143.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1955. A Manual of Phonology. Baltimore: Waverly Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. 1972. The syllable in phonological theory. Language 48: 525–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Chin-Wu. 1971. Experimental phonetics: Retrospect and prospect. A Survey of Linguistic Science, ed. by William O. Dingwall, 16–135. Chicago Park, MD.: Linguistics Program, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Klingenheben, August. 1927/28. Die Silbenauslautgesetze des Hausa. Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen 18: 272–297.Google Scholar
Kohler, Konrad. J. 1966. Is the syllable a phonological universal? Journal of Linguistics 2: 207–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1948. Contribution à la théorie de la syllable. Bulletin de la Société Polonaise de Linguistique 8: 80–114.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1960. Segmental and syllabic quantity in Estonian. American Studies in Uralic Linguistics [Indiana], 21–82.Google Scholar
. 1965. The function of quantity in Finnish and Estonian. Language 41: 447–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lukas, Johannes. 1970/71. Die personalia und das primäre Verb im Bolanci (Nordnigerien) [part 1]”. Afrika u. Übersee 54: 237–286.Google Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. 1963. Structural Linguistics and Human Communication: An Introduction into the Mechanism of Language and the Methodology of Linguistics. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1965. Stability and instability of syllabic structure. Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, ed. by E. Zwirner & W. Bethge 403–407. Basel: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1952. Langues à syllabes ouvertes: le cas du slave commun. Zeitschrift für Phonetik u. Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 6: 145–163.Google Scholar
Miyaoka, Osahito. 1971. On syllable modification and quantity in Yuk phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics 37: 219–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Paul. 1974. The Kanakuru Language. (West African Language Monograph Series, 9). Leeds: Institute of Modern English Language Studies and West African Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul & Roxana Ma. 1966. Comparative Chadic: Phonology and lexicon. Journal of African Languages 5: 218–251.Google Scholar
Newman, Roxana Ma. 1971. Downstep in Ga’anda. JournaI of African Languages 10: 15–27.Google Scholar
Parsons, F. W. 1955. Abstract nouns of sensory quality and their derivatives in Hausa. Afrikanistische Studien, ed. by J. Lukas, 373–404. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. 1943. Phonetics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pike, Kenneth L. & Eunice Victoria Pike. 1947. Immediate constituents of Mazateco syllables. International Journal of American Linguistics 13: 78–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1970. Syllable, Word, Nexus, Cursus. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey. 1970. On the need for a phonological base. Language 46: 586–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stetson, R. H. 1951. Motor Phonetics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1971. The phonology of Gothic vowels. Language 47: 90–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1972. On the theory of syllabic phonology. Linguistische Berichte 18: 1–18.Google Scholar
References [added 2017]
Gimba, Alhaji Maina & Russell G. Schuh. 2015. Bole-English-Hausa Dictionary and English-Bole Wordlist. (University of California Publications in Linguistics, 148) Oakland: University of California Press. (Available at <[URL]>)
Hyman, Larry M. 1985. A Theory of Phonological Weight. (Publications in Language Sciences, 19) Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Newman, Paul. 1972. Syllable weight as a phonological variable: The nature and function of the contrast between ‘Heavy’ and ‘Light’ syllables”. Studies in African Linguistics 3: 301–323.Google Scholar
. 2000. The Hausa Language: An Encyclopedic Reference Grammar. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Klingenheben’s Law in Hausa. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
. 2013. The Chadic Language family: Classification and name index. Mega-Chad Miscellaneous Publications, 1–11. <[URL]>.