Cover not available
Part of
The Diachrony of Classification Systems
Edited by William B. McGregor and Søren Wichmann
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 342] 2018
► pp. 9–32

The semantic reduction of the noun universe and the diachrony of nominal classification

Classifiers and noun class markers are often semantically general and semantically opaque compared to open-class nouns, and in this sense they constitute a semantic reduction of the noun universe. These two semantic characteristics also play important roles in the diachronic development of nominal classification systems. First, the need for semantically general forms for anaphoric reference may be a possible motivation for developing nominal classification in the first place. Second, opaque classification, which may, for example, emerge through coalescence of classes with homophonous markers, may be replaced by transparent classification because of the incompatibility of opaque classification and certain syntactic constructions, such as contrastive focus. Finally, opaque classification, typical of grammatical gender systems, is less likely to diffuse through language contact than transparent classification, which is typical for other types of systems, including numeral classifier systems.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A definition of nominal classification
  • 3.The pragmatics of semantic generality
  • 4.Semantic opacity and renewal
    • 4.1Descriptive content of classifiers, semantically transparent and opaque classification
    • 4.2From semantically transparent to opaque assignment
    • 4.3Replacement of opaque classification by transparent classification
  • 5.Differential diffusability of nominal classification
  • 6.Summary and conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 May 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.342.02sei
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2000 Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allan, Keith
1977 “Classifiers”. Language 53.283–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
1988 “Referring and Accessibility”. Journal of Linguistics 24.65–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Michael
1992 A Situated Theory of Agreement. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Bokamba, Eyamba G.
1977 “The Impact of Multilingualism on Language Structures: The case of Central Africa”. Anthropological Linguistics 19.181–202.Google Scholar
Bosch, Peter
1988 “Representing and Accessing Focussed Referents”. Language and Cognitive Processes 3.207–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L.
1994 Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1994 “Towards a Typology of Reference-Tracking Devices”. Handout for paper presented at the International Symposium on Language Typology, University of Tsukuba, January 1994.
Contini-Morava, Ellen
1994 Noun Classification in Swahili (= Publications of the Institute for Advanced Technology in the Humanities, Research Reports, 2nd Series). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia. [URL]. (Accessed: 1 March 2014.)Google Scholar
1997 “Noun Classification in Swahili: A cognitive-semantic analysis using a computer database”. African Linguistics at the Crossroads. Papers from Kwaluseni, 1st World Congress of African Linguistics, Swaziland, 18–22. VII. 1994 ed. by Robert K. Herbert, 599–628. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Contini-Morava, Ellen & Marcin Kilarski
2013 “Functions of Nominal Classification”. Language Sciences 40.263–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
1991 Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette G.
1986 “Jacaltec Noun Classifiers: A study in grammaticalization”. Lingua 70: 4.241–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1994 “Semantic Universals in Classifier Systems”. Word 45.145–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daley, Karen Ann C.
1998 The Use of Classifiers in Vietnamese Narrative Texts. Arlington, Texas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Downing, Pamela
1996 Numeral Classifier Systems: The case of Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erbaugh, Mary S.
1986 “Taking Stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children”. Noun Classes and Categorization ed. by Colette G. Craig, 399–436. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara
1987 Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1976 “Topic, Pronoun, and Grammatical Gender.”. Subject and Topic ed. by Charles N. Li, 149–188. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
1983a “ Topic Continuity in Discourse: An introduction.”. Givón, ed. 1983b.1–41Google Scholar
ed. 1983b Topic Continuity in Discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grinevald, Colette
2000 “ A Morphosyntactic Typology of Classifiers.”. Systems of Nominal Classification ed. by Gunter Senft, 50–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski
1993 “Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse”. Language 69.274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1982 “African Noun Class Systems.”. Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen, Vol. I: Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomene ed. by Hansjakob Seiler & Christian Lehmann (= Language Universal Series), 189–216. Tübingen: Gunter NarrGoogle Scholar
Katamba, Francis
2003 “Bantu Nominal Morphology.”. The Bantu Languages ed. by Derek Nurse & Gérard Philippson, 103–120. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1986 “Classifiers as a Reflection of Mind.”. Noun Classes and Categorization ed. by Colette Craig, 13–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1988 “On the Function of Agreement”. Agreement in Natural Languages ed. by Michael Barlow & Charles A. Ferguson, 55–65. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C.
2000 Presumptive Meaning: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, William B.
2002 Verb Classification in Australian Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984 “The Evolution of Noun Incorporation”. Language 60.847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992 Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 “Diversity and Stability in Language.”. The Handbook of Historical Linguistics ed. by Brain D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda, 283–310. Malden, MA: Blackwell DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nida, Eugene
1975 Componential Analysis of Meaning: An introduction to semantic structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Olstad, John
2011 “Noun Class Assignment in Swahili via Bayesian Probability.” On Words and Sounds: A selection of papers from the 40th PLM, 2009 ed. by Kamila Dębowska-Kozłowska & Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, 180–194. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars..Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E.
1988 “Referential Distance and Discourse Structure in Yagua”. Studies in Language 12.345–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seifart, Frank
2005 The Structure and Use of Shape-Based Noun Classes in Miraña (North West Amazon) (= MPI Series in Psycholinguistics, 33). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. [URL]. (Accessed: 1 March 2014.)Google Scholar
2010 “Nominal Classification”. Language & Linguistics Compass 4:8.719–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seiler, Hansjakob
1986 Apprehension: Language, object, and order. Part III: The universal dimension of apprehension. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Wichmann, Søren & Eric W. Holman
2009 Temporal Stability of Linguistic Typological Features (= LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, 42). Munich: LINCOM EUROPA.Google Scholar
Wiebusch, Thekla
2009 “The Diachronic Development of Chinese Numeral Classifiers.” Paper presented at The Diachrony of Classification Systems, Netherlands Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences, March 2009.Google Scholar
Wilkins, David P.
1996 “Morphology”. Contact Linguistics: An international handbook of contemporary research ed. by Hans Goebl, Peter H. Nelde, Zdenek Starý & Wolfgang Wölck, Vol. I, 109–117. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich
1986 “Die wiederholte Klassifikation von Substantiven: Zur Entstehung von Deklinationsklassen”. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 39:1.76–96.Google Scholar
Zubin, David & Klaus Michael Köpke
1986 “Gender and Folk Taxonomy: The indexical relation between grammatical and lexical categorization”. Noun Classes and Categorization ed. by Colette Craig, 139–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Di Garbo, Francesca & Annemarie Verkerk
2022. A typology of northwestern Bantu gender systems. Linguistics 60:4 ► pp. 1169 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.