Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen
Edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh and Lene Schøsler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 345] 2019
► pp. 107–122

Deconstructing markedness in sound change typology

Notes on θ > f and f > θ

Many sound changes have been attributed to misperception (Ohala 1981, 1993). When two sounds A and B are perceptually similar, A can be misperceived as B and vice versa. One sound change attributed solely to perceptual similarity is θ > f (Blevins 2004). Misperception of [θ] as [f] yields θ > f, while hearing [f] as [θ] should lead to f > θ changes. Context-free shifts of θ > f are attested, but regular f > θ changes are rare. Recent research questions the existence of f > θ changes and the perceptual basis of θ > f changes. Historical, typological, experimental, developmental, and language contact data reviewed here support the original perceptual account of θ > f and f > θ, suggesting that the observed asymmetry can be explained phonetically and structurally, without reference to markedness (cf. Andersen 2008).
Keywords: sound change, markedness, perceptual similarity, dental fricative
Article outline
  • 1.Asymmetries in sound change typology
  • 2.Perceptual similarity and sound change: The case of θ > f
  • 3.θ > f without pre-existing /f/?
  • 4.Frequency of θ > f
  • 5.Is there f > θ sound change?
  • 6.Explanations
  • 7.Markedness?
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.345.04ble
References (66)
References
Alvar, Manuel. 1996. Manuel de dialectología hispánica: el español de España. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning.1989. Markedness theory: The first 150 years. In Olga Miseska Tomic (ed.), Markedness in synchrony and diachrony, 11–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Markedness and the theory of linguistic change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 219), 19–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Naturalness and markedness. In Klaas Willems and Ludovic de Cuypere (eds.), Naturalness and iconicity in Language (Iconicity in Language and Literature, 7.), 101–119. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E., & Edwards, Jan. 2010. Generalizing over lexicons to predict consonant mastery. Laboratory Phonology 1. 319–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bender, Byron, Ward Goodenough, Frederick Jackson, Jeffrey Marck, Kenneth Rehg, Ho-min Sohn, Stephen Trussel & Judith Wang. 2003. Proto-Micronesian Reconstructions 1. Oceanic Linguistics 42. 1–110.Google Scholar
Biggs, Bruce. 1965. Direct and indirect inheritance in Rotuman. Lingua 14. 383–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. New perspectives on English sound patterns: ‘Natural’ and ‘Unnatural’ in Evolutionary Phonology. Journal of English Linguistics 34. 6–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Natural and unnatural sound patterns: A pocket field guide. In Klaas Willems & Ludovic De Cuypere (eds.), Naturalness and Iconicity in Language, 121–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Structure-preserving sound change: A look at unstressed vowel syncope in Austronesian. In Alexander Adelaar & Andrew Pawley (eds.), Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A festschrift for Bob Blust, 33–49. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2015. Evolutionary Phonology: A holistic approach to sound change typology. In Patrick Honeybone and Joseph Salmons (eds.), Handbook of Historical Phonology, 485–500. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2017. Areal sound patterns: From perceptual magnets to stone soup. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Areal Linguistics, 88–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blust, Robert. 2009. The Austronesian Languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert and Stephen Trussel. 2013. Austronesian Comparative Dictionary. [URL].
Brannen, Kathleen J. 1998. The acquisition of interdentals in L2. University of Ottawa, MOT Phonology Workshop.Google Scholar
2011. The perception and production of interdental fricatives in second language acquisition. PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, McGill University, Montreal.Google Scholar
Chitoran, Ioana & José I. Hualde. 2007. From hiatus to diphthong: the evolution of vowel sequences in Romance. Phonology 24. 37–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Chene, Brent E. & Stephen R. Anderson. 1979. Compensatory lengthening. Language 55. 505–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dyson, Alice T. and Mousa M. Amayreh. 2000. Phonological errors and sound changes in Arabic-speaking children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 14. 79–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jan & Mary E. Beckman. 2008. Some cross-linguistic evidence for modulation of implicational universals by language-specific frequency effects in phonological development, Language Learning and Development, 4(2). 122–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jan, Beckman, Mary E. & Munson, Benjamin. 2015. Frequency effects in phonological acquisition. Journal of Child Language 42:306–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eilers, Rebecca E. 1977. Context-sensitive perception of naturally produced stop and fricative consonants by infants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61. 1321–1336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eilers, Rebecca E. & Fred D. Minifie. 1975. Fricative discrimination in early infancy. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18. 158–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Wolfdietrich & Otto Jastrow. 1980. Handbuch der arabischen Dialekte. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Flynn, Darin & Sean Fulop. 2014. Acoustic Phonetic Features in Athabaskan Sound Change. Diachronica 31(2). 192–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Andrew and Keith Johnson. 2013. Phonetic bias in sound change. In Alan C. L. Yu (ed.), Origins of sound change: Approaches to phonologization, 51–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guion, Susan G., James E. Flege., Reiko Akahane-Yamada & Jesica C. Pruitt. 2000. An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults‘ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (5). 2711–2724. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Katherine Sanford. 1958. Cues for the discrimination of American English fricatives in spoken syllables. Language and Speech 1: 1–7.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayden, Mary E., Emily Kirsten & Sadanand Singh. 1979. Role of distinctive features in dichotic perception of 21 English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 65. 1039–1046. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hetzron, Robert (ed.). 1997. The Semitic Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1985. Distinguished Lecture: F. American Anthropologist, New Series 87. 263–281.Google Scholar
Howren, Robert A. 1975. Some isoglosses in Mackenzie-drainage Athapaskan: First steps toward a subgrouping. In Annette McFadyen Clark (ed.), Northern Athapaskan Conference 1971, 577–618. Ottawa: Ethnology division, National Museum of Man. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith & Molly Babel. 2010. On the perceptual basis of distinctive features: Evidence from the perception of fricatives by Dutch and English speakers. Journal of Phonetics 38. 127–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark J. 2002. More on the “instability” of interdental fricatives: Gothic þliuhan ‘flee’ and Old English flēon ‘flee’ revisited. Word 53(1). 1–8. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jongman, Allard., Ratree Wayland & Serena Wong. 2000. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108. 1252–1263. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kavitskaya, Darya. 2002. Compensatory lengthening: Phonetics, phonology, diachrony. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran. 1995. Unstable fricatives: On Gothic þliuhan ‘flee’ and Old English flēon ‘flee’. Word 46. 207–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kümmel, Martin Joachim. 2007. Konsonantenwandel: Bausteine zu einer Typologie des Lautwandels und ihre Konsequenzen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Paul Cohen, Clarence Robins & John Lewis. 1968. A study of the non-standard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Final report, Cooperative Research Project 3288. Vols. I and II.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson. 1996. The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lambacher, Stephen., William Marten, Brian Nelson & Jonathan Berman. 1997. Perception of English voiceless fricatives by native speakers of Japanese. In J. Leather and A. James (eds.), New Sounds 97: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-Language Speech, 186–195. Klagenfurt: University of Klagenfurt.Google Scholar
Levitt, Andrea, Peter W. Jusczyk, Janice Murray & Guy Carden. 1988. Context effects in two-month-old infants’ perception of labiodental/interdental fricative contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14. 361–368.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, Ian & Kristin Precoda. 1990. UPSID-PC. The UCLA Phonological Segment Inventory Database. Accessible from [[URL]]
Maddieson, Ian. 2008. Chapter 9 Presence of Uncommon Consonants. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The World Atlas of Languages Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar
McGuire, Grant and Molly Babel. 2012. A cross-modal account for synchronic and diachronic patterns of /f/ and /θ/ in English. Laboratory Phonology 3. 251–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKay, Carolyn. 1995. A Veneto Lexicon: the Dialect of Segusino and Chipilo. Treviso, Italy: Grafiche Antiga.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. & Patricia Nicely. 1955. An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions among some English Consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27. 338–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moreno Fernández, Francisco. 1996. “Castilla la Nueva.” In Manuel Alvar (ed.), Manuel de dialectología hispánica: El español de España , 213–232. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Ohala, John. J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In C. S. Masek, R. Hendrick, & M. Miller (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 178–203. Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In Peter F. MacNeilage (ed.), The Production of Speech, 189–216. New York: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John. J. 1990. The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech, 258–275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Charles Jones (ed.), Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon. 2004. A psycholinguistic theory of loanword adaptations. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. BLS 30.Google Scholar
Quilis, Antonio. 1996. La lengua española en Guinea Ecuatorial. In Manuel Alvar (ed.), Manuel de dialectología hispánica: El español de España, 381–388. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1989. A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruhlen, Merritt. 1975. A guide to the languages of the world. Stanford: Stanford University Language Universals Project.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1874. History of English sounds. London: Trübner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Severtsen, Eva. 1960. Cockney Phonology. Oslo: Oslo University Press.Google Scholar
Smit, Anna Bosma. 1993. Phonologic error distributions in the Iowa-Nebraska Norms Project: Consonant Singletons. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 36. 533–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabain, Marija. 1998. Non-Sibilant Fricatives in English: Spectral Information above 10 kHz. Phonetica 55. 107–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tharp, George W. 1972. The position of the Tsetsaut among Northern Athapaskans. International Journal of American Linguistics 39. 14–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vihman, Marylyn May. 1996. Phonological development: The origins of language in the child. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English, vols. 1–3. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wenk, B. J. 1979. Articulatory setting and de-fossilization. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin 4. 202–220.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Blevins, Juliette & Ander Egurtzegi
2023. Refining explanation in Evolutionary Phonology: macro-typologies and targeted typologies in action. Linguistic Typology 27:2 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.