Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Language Structure and Language Change: Studies in honor of Henning Andersen
Edited by Lars Heltoft, Iván Igartua, Brian D. Joseph, Kirsten Jeppesen Kragh and Lene Schøsler
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 345] 2019
► pp. 359–380

A complicated relationship

Balto-Slavic accentual mobility as a non-trivial shared innovation

The Baltic and Slavic subgroups of the Indo-European language family are more closely related to each other than to any of the other surviving subgroups; yet it is debated whether they form a subgroup of Indo-European descending from a uniform Balto-Slavic proto-language. While most historical linguists do operate with a Balto-Slavic subgroup and a matching proto-language, others remain sceptical.
In this contribution I focus on one of the most salient similarities between Baltic and Slavic: the paradigmatic accentual mobility found in both subgroups. Following a discussion of non-trivial shared innovations as a diagnostic tool in linguistic subgrouping, I examine the Balto-Slavic problem in the light of three different hypotheses on the origin of accentual mobility.
Keywords: Baltic, Slavic, Balto-Slavic, Indo-European, linguistic subgrouping, cladistics, prosody, accentology, accentual mobility
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The Balto-Slavic problem
  • 3.The Baltic problem
  • 4.Non-trivial shared innovations
  • 5.Genealogically shared innovations vs. contact-induced shared innovations
  • 6.Accentual mobility as a shared innovation
    • 6.1Introductory remarks
    • 6.2Pedersen’s Law, Barytonesis, Accent Retraction: Kortlandt
    • 6.3Saussure–Pedersen’s Law, Proto-Vasil’ev–Dolobko’s Law: Jasanoff
    • 6.4Mobility Law: Olander
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 18 June 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.345.17ola
References (108)
References
Andersen, Henning. 1996. Reconstructing prehistorical dialects: Initial vowels in Slavic and Baltic (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 91). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Slavic. In Paolo Ramat & Anna Giacalone Ramat (eds.), The Indo-European languages, 415–453. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2009. The satem languages of the Indo-European Northwest. First contacts? In Angela Marcantonio (ed.), The Indo-European language family: Questions about its status (Journal of Indo-European Studies, Monograph Series 55(2)), 1–31. Washington (DC): Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Arumaa, Peeter. 1964. Urslavische Grammatik. Einführung in das vergleichende Studium der slavischen Sprachen. Vol. 1. Einleitung. Lautlehre (I. Teil: Vokalismus, II. Teil: Betonung). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Babik, Zbigniew. 2012. Korespondencje akcentowe między słowiańskim i starszymi językami indoeuropejskimi (pierwotne neutra tematyczne): Przyczynki do krytyki akcentologii post- Iłłicz-Swityczowskiej. Kraków: Lexis.Google Scholar
Barbançon, François, Steven N. Evans, Luay Nakhleh, Don Ringe & Tandy Warnow. 2013. An experimental study comparing linguistic phylogenetic reconstruction methods. Diachronica 30(2). 143–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beekes, Robert S. P. 1995. Comparative Indo-European linguistics: An introduction. Translated by Paul Gabriner. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (2nd edn., revised and corrected by Michiel de Vaan, 2011.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Pre-Greek: Phonology, morphology, lexicon (Brill Introductions to Indo-European Languages 2). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouckaert, Remco, Philippe Lemey, Michael Dunn, Simon J. Greenhill, Alexander V. Alekseyenko, Alexei J. Drummond, Russell D. Gray, Marc A. Suchard & Quentin D. Atkinson. 2012. Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337. 957–960. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1897. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. 2. Bearbeitung. Vol. 1. Einleitung und Lautlehre. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
. 1904. Kurze vergleichende Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Straßburg: Trübner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulaxovs’kyj, Leonid Arsenovič. 1959. Акцентологическая проблематика вопроса о славяно-балтийском языковом единстве. In Rakstu krājums, veltījums akadēmiķim profesoram Dr. Jānim Endzelīnam viņa 85 dzīves un 65 darba gadu atcerei, 55–78. Rīga: Latvijas PSR Zinātņu akadēmijas Izdevniecība. 1980. Вибрані праці. Vol. 4, 163–179. Слов’янська акцентологія. Kиїв: Інститут мовознавства ім. О. О. Потебні.Google Scholar
Chang, Will, Chundra Cathcart, David Hall & Andrew Garrett. 2015. Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language 91(1). 194–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clackson, James. 1994. The linguistic relationship between Armenian and Greek (Publications of the Philological Society 30). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2007. Indo-European linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowgill, Warren. 1985. The personal endings of thematic verbs in Indo-European. In Bernfried Schlerath & Veronica Rittner (eds.), Grammatische Kategorien, Funktion und Geschichte. Akten der VII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Berlin, 20.–25. Februar 1983, 99–108. Wiesbaden: Reichert. (Longer version in: Jared S. Klein (ed.). 2006. The collected writings of Warren Cowgill, 535–567. Ann Arbor, MI & New York: Beech Stave.)Google Scholar
Derksen, Rick. 2004. Balto-Slavic accentuation: an update. Histoire, Épistémologie, Langage 26(2). 81–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Etymological dictionary of the Slavic inherited lexicon (Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 4). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dini, Pietro Umberto. 1997. Le lingue baltiche (Biblioteca di Cultura 223. Lingue d’Europa 5). Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Dybo, Vladimir Antonovič, Galina Igorevna Zamjatina & Sergej L’vovič Nikolaev. 1990. Основы славянской акцентологии. Москва: Наука.Google Scholar
Dyen, Isidore, Joseph B. Kruskal & Paul Black. 1992. An Indoeuropean classification: a lexicostatistical experiment. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 82. iii–iiv, 1–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Endzelīns, Jānis. 1911. Славяно-балтiйскiе этюды. Харьковъ: Зильбергергъ. (H. Bendiks et al. (eds.). 1974. Jānis Endzelīns: Darbu izlase / Янис Эндзелин: Избранные труды / Jānis Endzelīns: Ausgewählte Werke. Vol. 2, 167–354. Rīga: Zinātne.)Google Scholar
. 1931. Par prūšu valodas radniecības sakariem. Filologu Biedrības raksti 11. 189–193. (H. Bendiks, et al. (eds.). 1979. Jānis Endzelīns: Darbu izlase / Янис Эндзелин: Избранные труды / Jānis Endzelīns: Ausgewählte Werke. Vol. 3(1), 542–551. Rīga: Zinātne.)Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W., IV. 2015. Indo-European: Methods and problems. In Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds.), The Routledge handbook of historical linguistics, 645–656. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fortunatov, Filipp Fëdorovič. 1897. Разборъ сочиненія Г. К. Ульянова: Значенія глагольныхъ основъ въ литовско-славянскомъ языкѣ. I часть: Основы, обозначающія различія по залогамъ. Варшава. 1891. Стр. 4, V, 306 и V. II часть: Основы, обозначающія различія по видамъ. Варшава. 1895. Стр. IV, 341 и VIII. In Отчетъ о присужденіи Ломоносовской преміи въ 1895 году (Сборникъ Отдѣленія русскаго языка и словесности Императорской Академіи Наукъ 64(11)), 1–149. Санктпетербургъ: Императорская Академія Наукъ.Google Scholar
Fox, Anthony. 1995. Linguistic reconstruction: An introduction to theory and method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Garde, Paul. 1976. Histoire de l’accentuation slave. Paris: Institut d’Études Slaves.Google Scholar
Georgiev, Vladimir I. 1981. Introduction to the history of the Indo-European languages. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Gray, Russell D. & Quentin D. Atkinson. 2003. Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426. 435–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Eugen. 2017. Phonological evidence for a Proto-Baltic stage in the evolution of East and West Baltic. International Journal of Diachronic Linguistics and Linguistic Reconstruction 13. 205–232.Google Scholar
Hock, Wolfgang. 2000. Balto-Slavisch, Indo-Iranisch, Italo-Keltisch: Kriterien fur die Annahme von Sprachgemeinschaften in der Indogermania. In Jochen D. Range (ed.), Aspekte baltistischer Forschung (Schriften des Instituts für Baltistik der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald 1), 119–145. Essen: Die Blaue Eule.Google Scholar
. 2006. Baltoslavisch: 3. Teil: Die baltoslavische Sprachgemeinschaft, Nachträge. Kratylos 51. 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoenigswald, Henry M. 1966. Criteria for the subgrouping of languages. In Ancient Indo-European dialects. Proceedings of the conference on Indo-European linguistics held at the University of California, Los Angeles April 25–27, 1963 Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Holzer, Georg. 1995. Review of Poljakov 1995. Wiener slavistisches Jahrbuch 41. 304–310.Google Scholar
. 1996. Das Erschließen unbelegter Sprachen (Schriften über Sprachen und Texte 1). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
. 1998. Urslavisch und Baltisch. Wiener slavistisches Jahrbuch 44. 27–56.Google Scholar
. 2001. Zur Lautgeschichte des baltisch-slavischen Areals. Wiener slavistisches Jahrbuch 47. 33–50.Google Scholar
. 2009. Urslavische Prosodie. Wiener slavistisches Jahrbuch 55. 151–178.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vjačeslav Vsevolodovič & Vladimir Nikolaevič Toporov. 1958. К постановке вопроса о древнейших отношениях балтийских и славянских языков. In IV Международный съезд славистов: Доклады. Москва: Издательство АН СССР.Google Scholar
. 1961. К постановке вопроса о древнейших отношениях балтийских и славянских языков. In Nikita Il’ič Tolstoj (ed.), Исследования по славянскому языкознанию, 273–305. Москва: Издательство АН СССР.Google Scholar
Ivić, Pavle. 1958. Die serbokroatischen Dialekte: Ihre Struktur und Entwicklung. Vol. 1. Allgemeines und die štokavische Dialektgruppe (Slavistische drukken en herdrukken 18). ’s Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1938. Sur la théorie des affinités phonologiques entre les langues. In Actes du Quatrième Congrès Internationale de Linguistes, 48–59. Copenhagen: Einar Munksgaard. (Jakobson 1962/2002, 234–246.)Google Scholar
. 1962. Selected writings. Vol. 1. Phonological studies. ’s Gravenhage, The Hague & Paris: Mouton. (3rd edition, with a new introduction by Linda R. Waugh and Monique Monville-Burston, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2002.)Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay H. 2008. The accentual type *vèdō, *vedeti̍ and the origin of mobility in the Balto-Slavic verb. Baltistica 43(3). 339–379.Google Scholar
2011. Balto-Slavic mobility as an Indo-European problem. In Roman Sukač (ed.), From present to past and back: Papers on Baltic and Slavic accentology (Potsdam Linguistic Investigations 7), 52–74. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
2017. The prehistory of the Balto-Slavic accent (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages & Linguistics 17). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.. 2017. Balto-Slavic: What Meillet was thinking, or, what was Meillet thinking?! Acta Linguistica Lithuanica 76. 40–50.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. & Rex Wallace. 1987. Latin sum / Oscan súm, sim , esum . American Journal of Philology 108. 675–693. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kapović, Mate. 2015. Povijest hrvatske akcentuacije. Fonetika. Zagreb: Matica hrvatska.Google Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1977. Historical laws of Baltic accentuation. Baltistica 13(2). 319–330. (Kortlandt 2009c: 1–12.)Google Scholar
. 1979. Toward a reconstruction of the Balto-Slavic verbal system. Lingua 49. 51–70. (Kortlandt 2009c: 151–165.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Balto-Slavic accentual mobility. Baltistica 41(3). 359–369. (Kortlandt 2009c: 93–101.)Google Scholar
. 2009a. Accent retraction and tonogenesis. In Thomas Olander & Jenny Helena Larsson (eds.), Stressing the past (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 35), 75–82. Amsterdam & New York: Rodopi. (Kortlandt 2009c: 103–109.)Google Scholar
. 2009b. All’s well that ends well. Baltistica 44(1). 59–63. (Kortlandt 2010b, 337–339.)Google Scholar
. 2009c. Baltica & Balto-Slavica (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 16). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 2010a. Balto-Slavic accentuation revisited. Wiener slavistisches Jahrbuch 56. 61–81. (Kortlandt 2010b: 341–357.) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010b. Studies in Germanic, Indo-European and Indo-Uralic (Leiden Studies in Indo-European 17). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 2011. Balto-Slavic reconstruction: A clarification. Baltistica 46(1). 39–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming. Proto-Baltic?. Baltistica. DOI logo
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1958. О балто-славянском языковом единстве. Вопросы славянского языкознания 3. 15–49.Google Scholar
Lötzsch, Ronald. 1992. Können die spezifischen baltisch-slawischen Übereinstimmungen auf Zufall oder sekundärer Konvergenz beruhen? In Bernd Barschel, Maria Kozianka & Karin Weber (eds.), Indogermanisch, Slawisch und Baltisch (Slavistische Beiträge 285), 89–99. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Matasović, Ranko. 2017. The sources for Indo-European reconstruction. In Jared S. Klein, Brian D. Joseph & Matthias Fritz (eds.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 41(1)), 20–25. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1908. Les dialectes indo-européens. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
. 1908. Les dialectes indo-européens. Paris: Honoré Champion. (Nouveau tirage, avec une introduction nouvelle et des additions (Collection linguistique par la Société de Linguistique de Paris 1), Paris: Édouard Champion, 1922; reprint 1984.)Google Scholar
. 1914. Sur l’accentuation des noms en indo-européen. Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 19(2). 65–84.Google Scholar
Nakhleh, Luay et al. 2005. A comparison of phylogenetic reconstruction methods on an Indo-European dataset. Transactions of the Philological Society 103(2). 171–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakhleh, Luay, Donald A. Ringe & Tandy Warnow. 2005. Perfect phylogenetic networks: A new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81. 382–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Alan J. 1986. Head and horn in Indo-European (Untersuchungen zur indogermanischen Sprach- und Kulturwissenschaft 2). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olander, Thomas. 2006. Accentual mobility: The prehistory of the Balto-Slavic mobile accent paradigms. PhD thesis, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
. 2007. The Balto-Slavic mobile accent paradigms. In Mate Kapović & Ranko Matasović (eds.), Tones and Theories: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Balto-Slavic Accentology, Zagreb, 1–3 July 2005, 1–14. Zagreb: Institut za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje.Google Scholar
. 2009. Balto-Slavic accentual mobility (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 199). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Indo-European heritage in the Balto-Slavic accentuation system. In Götz Keydana, Paul Widmer & Thomas Olander (eds.), Indo-European accent and ablaut (Copenhagen Studies in Indo-European 5), 129–147. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum.Google Scholar
. 2015. Proto-Slavic inflectional morphology: A comparative handbook (Brill’s Studies in Indo-European Languages and Linguistics 14). Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. The dark past of Balto-Slavic prosody: On Jay Jasanoff’s book The prehistory of the Balto-Slavic accent. Lingua 207. 96–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming. Connecting the dots: The Indo-European family tree as a heuristic device. In David Goldstein, Stephanie Jamison & Brent VineProceedings of the 29th UCLA Indo-European Conference, 181–202. Bremen: Hempen.
Oslon, Mikhail. 2010. Review of Olander 2009. Вопросы языкознания 2010(2). 141–146.Google Scholar
Petit, Daniel. 2004. Les langues baltique et le question balto-slave. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 26(2). 7–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pohl, Heinz Dieter. 1980. Baltisch und Slavisch. Fiktion von der baltisch-slavischen Spracheinheit (Erster Teil). Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 6. 58–101.Google Scholar
. 1981. Baltisch und Slavisch. Fiktion von der baltisch-slavischen Spracheinheit (Zweiter Teil). Klagenfurter Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 7. 93–126.Google Scholar
Poljakov, Oleg. 1995. Das Problem der balto-slavischen Sprachgemeinschaft (Heidelberger Publikationen zur Slavistik. A. Linguistische Reihe 18). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Porzig, Walter. 1954. Die Gliederung des indogermanischen Sprachgebiets. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Pronk, Tijmen. 2014. Klaićev opis akcentuacije valpovačkoga podravskog govora. Rasprave: Časopis Instituta za hrvatski jezik i jezikoslovlje 40(2). 479–495.Google Scholar
Rexová, Kateřina, Daniel Frynta & Jan Zrzavý. 2003. Cladistic analysis of languages: Indo-European classification based on lexicostatistical data. Cladistics 19. 120–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Donald A. 2017. Indo-European dialectology. In Jared S. Klein, Brian D. Joseph & Matthias Fritz (eds.), Handbook of comparative and historical Indo-European linguistics (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 41(1)), 62–75. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Donald A. & Joseph F. Eska. 2013. Historical linguistics: Toward a twenty-first century reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Donald A., Tandy Warnow & Ann Taylor. 2002. Indo-European and computational linguistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100(1). 59–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rinkevičius, Vytautas. 2013. Žemaitian accent retraction as a typological parallel to Olander’s Mobility law. Handout and presentation, 9th International Workshop on Balto-Slavic Accentology, Juraj Dobrila University, Pula, 19–21 September 2013.Google Scholar
Salmons, Joseph C. 1992. Accentual change and language contact: Comparative survey and a case study of early northern Europe. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stang, Christian Schweigaard. 1957. Slavonic accentuation. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. (2. edn., 1965.)Google Scholar
. 1966. Vergleichende Grammatik der baltischen Sprachen. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
. 1969. La loi de Verner et la question des caractères de l’accentuation mobile en germanique. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 23. 7–12. 1970. Opuscula linguistica: Ausgewählte Aufsätze und Abhandlungen, 258–262. Oslo, Bergen & Tromsö: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Sukač, Roman. 2013. Introduction to Proto-Indo-Europan and Balto-Slavic accentology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1957. The problem of Balto-Slav unity – a critical survey. Kratylos 2. 97–123.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman. 1988. Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Toporov, Vladimir Nikolaevič. 1988. К реконструкции древнейшего состояния праслaвянского. In Nikita Il’ič Tolstoj (ed.), Славянское языкознание. Х Международный съезд славистов. София, сентябрь 1988 г. Доклады советской делегации, 264–292. Москва: Наука.Google Scholar
Vaillant, André. 1950. Grammaire comparée des langues slaves. Vol. 1. Phonétique (Collection “Les Langues du Monde”. Série Grammaire, Philologie, Littérature 6). Lyon & Paris: IAC.Google Scholar
Veenker, Wolfgang. 1967. Die Frage des finnougrischen Substrats in der russischen Sprache (Uralic and Altaic Series 82). Bloomington: Indiana University Publications.Google Scholar
Villanueva Svensson, Miguel. 2010Review of Kortlandt 2009. Baltistica 45(2). 359–379.Google Scholar
. 2014. On the relationship between West Baltic and East Baltic. In Tat’jana V. Civ’jan, Marija Zavjalova & Artūras Judžentis (eds.), Baltai ir slavai: dvasinių kulturų sankirtos, 162–176. Vilnius: Versmė.Google Scholar
. 2018. Review of Jasanoff 2017. Kratylos 63. 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1966. Italo-Celtic revisited. In Henrik Birnbaum & Jaan Puhvel (eds.), Ancient Indo-European dialects, 29–50. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
van Wijk, Nicolaas. 1923. Die baltischen und slavischen Akzent- und Intonationssysteme (Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, Afdeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, Deel 23(2)). Amsterdam: Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen. (2nd edn, ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton (Janua linguarum. Studia memoriae Nicolai van Wijk dedicata. Series minor 5), 1958.)Google Scholar
Winter, Werner. 1978. The distribution of short and long vowels in stems of the type Lith. ė́sti : vèsti : mèsti and OCS jasti : vesti : mesti in Baltic and Slavic languages. In Jacek Fisiak & Werner Winter (eds.), Recent developments in historical phonology. Vol. 4 (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 4), 431–446. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Steven R. 1994. Endzelin’s law and acute tone in Latvian. Linguistica Baltica 3. 101–108.Google Scholar
2017a. Balto-Slavic. In Mate Kapović (ed.), The Indo-European languages. Second edition, 479–485. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2017b. Baltic. In Mate Kapović (ed.), The Indo-European languages. Second edition, 486–518. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zeps, Valdis J. 1985. Is Slavic a West Baltic language? General Linguistics 24(4). 213–222.Google Scholar
Zinkevičius, Zigmas. 1966. Lietuvių dialektologija: lyginamoji tarmių fonetika ir morfologija. Vilnius: Mintis.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Rinkevičius, Vytautas
2021. The Žemaitian Accent Retraction as a Typological Parallel to Olander’s Mobility Law. Scando-Slavica 67:2 ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.