Perspectives on language structure and language change
An introduction
Article outline
- Theory of language change
- Indexicality
- Problems of reanalysis
- Actualization
- Language change and diachronic typology in Balto-Slavic
- Concluding remarks
-
References
References (15)
References
Andersen, Henning. 1972. Diphthongization. Language 48. 11–50. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Henning. 1973. Abductive and deductive change. Language 49. 765–793. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Henning. 1980. Morphological change: Towards a typology. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, 1–50. The Hague, Paris, New York: Mouton Publishers. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Henning. 1987. From auxiliary to desinence. In Martin Harris & Paolo Ramat (eds.), The historical development of auxiliaries, 21–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Henning. 2001. Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization. Linguistic change in progress, 226–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Henning. 2008. Naturalness and Markedness. In Klaas Willems & de Cuypere (eds.), Naturalness and Iconicity in Language, 101–119. Amsterdam-Philadephia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Henning. 2010. From morphologization to demorphologization. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to historical linguistics, 117–146. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Andersen, Henning. 2012. The new Russian vocative: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Scando-Slavica 51. 122–167. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baerman, Matthew. 2007. Morphological reversals. Journal of Linguistics 43. 33–61. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harder, Peter. 1996. Functional semantics: A theory of meaning, structure and tense in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koch, Harold. 1984. The category of ‘associated motion’ in Kaytej. Language in Central Australia 1. 23–34.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koch, Harold. 1995. The creation of morphological zeroes. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1994, 31–71. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langlois, Annie. 2004. Alive and kicking: Areyonga teenage Pitjantjatjara. Canberra: Australian National University![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilkins, David P. 1991. The semantics, pragmatics and diachronic development of ‘associated motion’ in Mparntwe Arrernte. Buffalo Papers in Linguistics 91. 207–257.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)