References (52)
Sources
Homer. Homeri Opera in five volumes, ed. by David B. Munro & Thomas W. Allen. 1920. Oxford: OUP. Digitalized at Berkeley, Linguistics: [URL]Google Scholar
Rigveda, Book 1: Metrically restored text, ed. by Karen Thomson & Jonathan Slocum. Austin: University of Texas, College of Liberal Arts. [URL]
References
Agrell, Sigurd. 1908. Aspektanderung und Aktionsartbildung beim polnischen Zeitworte [Aspect change and the formation of modes of action in the Polish verb]. Lund: Häkan Ohlssons Buchdruckerei (= Lunds Universitets Arsskrift, N. F. Afd. 1, Bd. 4, Nr. 2).Google Scholar
Amse-De Jong, Tine. 1974. The meaning of the finite verb forms in the Old Church Slavonic Codex Suprasliensis: A synchronic study. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning. 2003. Slavic and the Indo-European migrations. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Language Contacts in Prehistory; Studies in Stratigraphy, 45–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. On the origin of the Slavic aspects: Questions of chronology. In Vit Bubenik, John Hewson & Sarah R. Rose (eds.), Grammatical change in Indo-European languages. Papers presented at the Workshop on Indo-European linguistics at the 18th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 123–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2013. On the Origin of the Slavic Aspects: Aorist and Imperfect. Journal of the Slavic Linguistic Society 21:1. 17–43.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arkad’ev, Peter M. 2012. Aspektual’naja sistema litovskogo jazyka [Aspectual system of the Lithuanian language]. In Vladimir Plungian (ed.), Tipologija aspektual’nyx system i kategorij, 45–121. St. Petersburg: Nauka.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl. 1885. Zum heutigen Stand der Sprachwissenschaft (About the contemporary state of linguistics).Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Brunot, Ferdinand & Charles Brunot. 1949. Precis de grammaire historique de la language francaise (Outline of a historical Grammar of the French language). Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Bubenik, Vit. 1997. From Ancient to Modern Greek. In John Hewson & Vit Bubenik (eds.), Tense and Aspect in Indo-European Languages: Theory, Typology, Diachrony, 249–264. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cassidy, Lara M., Rui Martiniano, Eileen M. Murphy, Matthew D. Teasdale, James Mallory, Barrie Hartwell & Daniel Bradley. 2015. Neolithic and Bronze Age migration to Ireland and establishment of the insular Atlantic genome. PNAS open access [URL]Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein. 2008. Time, Tense and Aspect in Early Vedic Grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oslo, published also as Dahl, Eystein, 2010. Time, Tense and Aspect in Early Vedic Grammar. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
. 2012. Evidence for Evidentiality in Late Vedic. In Jared S. Klein & Kazuhiko Joshida (eds.), Indic across the Millennia, 9–21. Bremen: Hempen.Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1874. Das altindische Verbum aus den Hymnen der Rigveda seinem Baue nach dargestellt [The Old Indic verb from the hymns of the Rigveda presented according to its construction]. Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
. 1876. Altindische Tempuslehre (A study of Old Indic tenses). Halle: Verlag der Buchhandlung des Waisenhauses.Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini. 2007. Tense and Aspect in Indo-Aryan Languages: Variation and Diachrony. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. [URL]Google Scholar
Drinka, Bridget. 2011. The sacral stamp of Greek: Periphrastic constructions in New Testament translations of Latin, Gothic and Old Church Slavic. In Eirik Welo (ed.), Indo-European Syntax and Pragmatics: Contrastive Approaches, 41–74 (= Oslo Studies in Language 3.3). [URL]Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine & Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew. 2015. Aspect and prefixation in Old Church Slavic. Diachronica 32. 186–230.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gamkrelidze, Tamaz V. & Vyacheslav V. Ivanov. 1984. Indoevropekskij jazyk i indoevropejcy [Indo-European language and Indo-Europeans]. Tbilisi: Izdatel’stvo Tbilisskogo universiteta.Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, Jadranka. 2009. Celtic and Slavic and the Great Migrations. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
. 2012. Perfective and Imperfective Aspect. In Robert Binnick (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, 781–802. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2015. Evaluating prehistoric and early historic linguistic contact. In Dag T. T. Haug (ed.), Historical Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 21 International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Oslo, 5–9 August, 2013, 89–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hewson, John & Vit Bubenik. 1997. Tense and Aspect in Indo-European Languages. Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1995. A time-relational analysis of the Russian aspect. Language 71. 669–695.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederik. 1975. Slavic Accentuation: A Study in Relative Chronology. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.Google Scholar
. 2007. Italo-Celtic Origins and Prehistoric Development of the Irish Language. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 2013. Language vs. grammatical tradition in Ancient India: How real was Pāṇinian Sanskrit? Evidence from the history of late Sanskrit passives and pseudo-passives. Folia Linguistica Historica 34. 59–91.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kümmel, Martin Joachim. 2000. Das Perfekt im Indoiranischen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Leskien, August. 1919. Grammatik der altbulgarischen (altkirchenslavischen) Sprache [Grammar of the Old Bulgarian (Old Church Slavonic) Language]. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Mallory, James P. & Douglas Q. Adams. 2006. The Oxford Introduction to Proto-Indo-European and the Proto-Indo-European World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAnnallen, Julia. 2011. Predicative possession in Old Church Slavic Bible translations. In Eirik Welo (ed.), Indo-European Syntax and Pragmatics: Contrastive Approaches, 155–172 (= Oslo Studies in Language 3.3). [URL]Google Scholar
Meid, Wolfgang. 1975. Probleme der räumlichen und zeitlichen Gliederung des Indogermanischen [Problems of the spatial and temporal classification of Indo-European]. In Helmut Rix (ed.), Flexion and Wortbildung, Akten der V. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Regensburg 9.–14. Sept. 1973, 204–219. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1908a. Les dialects indo-europeens [Indo-European dialects]. Paris: Librairie Ancienne, Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
. 1908b. The Indo-European Dialects. Translated by Samuel N. Rosenberg. The University of Alabama Press 1967.Google Scholar
Menzenski, Matthew. 2015. On the Origins of Lengthened Zero-Grade Vocalism in Slavic and Baltic Derived Verbs. Paper presented at the 10th conference of the Slavic Linguistic Society, Heidelberg 4–6, September, 2015.Google Scholar
Navratil, Jan. 1856. Beitrag zum Studium des slavischen Zeitwortes aller Dialekte, insbesondere uber den Gebrauch u. die Bedeutung der Zeitformen in Vergleichung mit den classischen und modernen Sprachen (deutsch, italienisch, franzosisch und englisch) mit einer tabellarischen Ubersicht in allen obigen Sprachen, ein praktisches Handbuch beim Sprachstudium (Contribution to the study of Slavic aspect in all dialects, especially concerning the use and meaning of verb forms compared to classical and modern languages (German, Italian, French and English) with a tabular survey in all the mentioned languages, a practical manual for language studies). Wien: Mechitaristen-Congreg. Buchdruckerei.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ruijgh, Cornelis J. 1991. Les valeurs temporelles des formes verbales en grec ancien [Temporal values of verbal forms in ancient Greek]. In Jadranka Gvozdanović & Theo A.J. M. Janssen in collaboration with Östen Dahl (eds.) The Function of Tense in Texts, 197–217. Amsterdam: KNAW.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Karl H. 1996. Celtic: A Western Indo-European Language? In Wolfgang Mied (ed.), Innsbrucker Beitrage zur Sprachwissenschaft. Vortrage und Kleinere Schriften 66. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Schuyt, Rolf. 1990. The morphology of Slavic verbal aspect. A descriptive and historical study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Smotrickyj, Meletij. 1974. Hrammatiki slavenskija pravilnoe syntagma: Jevje 1619; kirchenslavische Grammatik (Erstausgabe) [The correct syntax of Slavonic grammar: Jevje 1619; a grammar of Church Slavonic (first edition)]. Olexa Horbatsch (ed.). Frankfurt a.M. – München: Kubon & Sagner (= Specimina philologiae slavicae 4).
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swart, Henriette de. 2012. Verbal Aspect. In Robert Binnick (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, 752–780. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Szemerényi, Oswald. 1987. The Origin of Aspect in the Indo-European Languages. Glotta 65:1/2. 1–18. [URL]Google Scholar
Thurneysen, Rudolf. 1946. A Grammar of Old Irish. Dublin: DIAS.Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1957. Verbs and Times. The Philosophical Review 66:2. 143–160.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2001. Lexical evidence for the parallel development of the Latvian and Livonian verb particles. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), Circum-Baltic Languages 2: Grammar and Typology, 413–441. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1962. Indo-European origins of the Celtic verb I: The sigmatic aorist. Dublin: DIAS.Google Scholar
. 1969. On the Prehistory of Celtic Verb Inflection. Eriu 21. 67–81.Google Scholar