References
Bartoli, Matteo
1925Introduzione alla Neolinguistica (Princìpi – Scopi – Metodi). Geneva: Biblioteca dell’Archivum Romanicum II: 12.Google Scholar
Boretzky, Norbert, Werner Enninger, & Thomas Stolz
(eds.) 1996Areale, Kontakte, Dialekte, Sprachen und ihre Dynamik in mehrsprachigen Situationen. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
2006Areal linguistics: A closer scrutiny. In Yaron Matras, April McMahon & Nigel Vincent (eds.). 1–31.Google Scholar
Carolus-Barré, Louis
1964Les plus anciennes chartes en langue française. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Chirikba, Viacheslav
2008The problem of the Caucasian Sprachbund. In Peter Muysken (ed.). 25–93.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Greville Corbett
(eds.) 1993The Slavonic Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
(ed.) 2000Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm
(eds.) 2001The Circum-Baltic languages: Typology and contact. 2 vols. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Viveka Velupillai
2013The Perfect. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.) (Available online at [URL]).Google Scholar
Décsy, Gyula
1973Die linguistische Struktur Europas: Vergangenheit, Gegenwart, Zukunft. Wiesbaden: Harrossowitz.Google Scholar
Drinka, Bridget
2017Language contact in Europe: The periphrastic perfect through history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin
(eds.) 2013The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. (Available online at [URL]) Google Scholar
Flobert, Pierre
1975Les verbes deponents latins des origins à Charlemagne. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor
1976Dialectal synchrony and diachronic syntax: The Macedonian perfect. In Sanford B. Steever, Carol A. Walker & Salikoko S. Mufwene (eds.), Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax, April 22, 1976. 96-104. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1994Surprise! Surprise! Arumanian has had an Admirative! Indiana Slavic Studies 7. 79–89.Google Scholar
Graves, Nina
2000Macedonian – a language with three perfects? In Östen Dahl, (ed.), 479–94.Google Scholar
Hamp, Eric
1989Yugoslavia – A Crossroads of Sprachbünde. Zeitschrift für Balkanologie 25. 44–47.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1998How young is Standard Average European? Language Sciences 20. 271–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Worfgang Raible (eds), 1492–1510.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, & Worfgang Raible
2001Language typology and change. Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien. La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1997Possession: Cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haarmann, Harald
1976Aspekte der Arealtypologie: Die Problematik der europäischen Sprachbünde. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2001Impersonals and passives in Baltic and Finnic. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.) Vol. 2. 363–389.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1931Über die Phonologischen Sprachbünde. Travaux du Circle Linguistique de Prague. 4. 234–140. Reprinted 1971 in Roman Jakobson. Selected Writings. Vol. 1. The Hague: Mouton, 137–143.Google Scholar
Joseph, Brian D.
2001Is Balkan comparative syntax possible? In María Luisa Rivero & Angela Ralli (eds.) 17–43.Google Scholar
Koptevskaja-Tamm, Maria, & Bernhard Wälchi
2001The Circum-Baltic languages: An areal-typological approach. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptevskaja-Tamm (eds.). Vol. 2. 615–761.Google Scholar
Koschmieder, Erwin & Maximilian Braun
(eds.) 1968Slavistische Studien. München: Trofenik.Google Scholar
Lindström, Liina & Ilona Tragel
2010The possessive perfect construction in Estonian. Folia Linguistica 44. 371–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathiassen, Terje
1985A discussion of the notion ‘Sprachbund’ and its application in the case of the languages in the Eastern Baltic area (Slavic, Baltic, and West Finnish). International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 31–32 (1985) 273–281.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron, April McMahon & Nigel Vincent
(eds.) 2006Linguistic areas: Convergence in historical and typological perspective. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Metslang, Helle
2001On the developments of the Estonian aspect: The verbal particle ära. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), Vol 2. 443–479.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
(ed.) 2008From linguistic areas to areal linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nau, Nicole
1996Ein Beitrag zur Arealtypologie der Ostseeanrainersprachen. In Norbert Boretzky, Werner Enninger & Thomas Stolz (eds.). Areale, Kontakte, Dialekte, Sprachen und ihre Dynamik in mehrsprachigen Situationen. 51–67. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Rivero, María Luisa & Angela Ralli
(eds.) 2001Comparative syntax of Balkan languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sandfeld, Kristian
1930Linguistique balkanique: Problèmes et résultats. Vol. 31. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas
1991Sprachbund im Baltikum?: Estnisch und Lettisch im Zentrum einer sprachlichen Konvergenzlandschaft. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2006All or nothing. In Yaron Matras, April McMahon & Nigel Vincent (eds.), 32–50.Google Scholar
Thielmann, P
1885Habere mit dem Part. Perf. Pass. Archiv für lateinische Lexicographie und Grammatik 2. 372–423; 509–549.Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf
2000On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe. In Östen Dahl (ed.), 264–305.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1976Subject properties in the North Russian passive. In Charles Li & Sandra Thompson (eds.). Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press. 547–570.Google Scholar
1993Russian. In Bernard Comrie and Greville Corbett (eds.), 827–886.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai
1928Proposition 16. Acts of the First International Congress of Linguists. 17–18.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
(ed.) 1998Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, EUROTYP 20–3) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Conclusion. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 813–836.Google Scholar
Vasilev, Christo
1968Der romanische Perfekttyp im Slavischen. In Erwin Koschmieder & Maximilian Braun (eds.), 215–230.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L.
1956Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. J. B. Carroll (ed.). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wünsch, Thomas
2008Deutsche und Slawen im Mittelalter: Beziehungen zu Tschechen, Polen, Südslawen und Russen. Munich: R. Oldenbourg. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Summary and Conclusion. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Introduction. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt, DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Concepts, Contexts, Corpora. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Semi-formulaic Phrases. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Discourse Markers. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 323 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Formulaic Language. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 365 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. The Basics of Coptic Grammar. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Verb Phrases. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. The Grammar of the Corpus (Standard and Variation). In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Adverbial Phrases. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Fendel, Victoria Beatrix Maria
2022. Corpus of Texts. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. 485 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Copyright Page. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Sigla. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. xiii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Abbreviations. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Dedication. In Coptic Interference in the Syntax of Greek Letters from Egypt,  pp. v ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.