References
Baruah, P. N. Dutta
1980An intensive course in Assamese. Mysore: CIIL.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Yogendra P. Yadav
2000A fresh look at grammatical relations in Indo-Aryan. Lingua 110. 343–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
1998Review article of ‘Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective’. Linguistic Typology 2. 381–397.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
1995Verb serialization and converbs – differences and similarities. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 137–188. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bloch, Jules
1965Indo-Aryan. From the Vedas to modern times. Paris: Librairie D’amerique Et D’orient Adrien – Maisonneuve.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam and Aditi Lahiri
2013Diachronic pertinacity of light verbs. Lingua 135: 7–29.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Robert
1875 A comparative grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian family of languages. 2nd edition, revised and enlarged. London: Trübner & Co.Google Scholar
Chālise, Bidurkumar
2006Aitihāsika abhilekhakā ādhāramā nepālī bhāṣākā vyākaraṇa tatvamā kramika vikāsako adhyayana. [A study on the stadial development in the grammar of the Nepali language based on the historical inscriptions]. Unpublished PhD thesis. Kathmandu: Tribhuvan University.Google Scholar
Chatterji, Suniti Kumar
1926. [1970] The Origin and Development of the Bengali Language. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Davison, Alice
1981Syntactic and semantic indeterminacy resolved: A mostly pragmatic analysis for the Hindi conjunctive participle. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 101–128. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
1994Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grierson George A.
1916. [2005]Linguistic Survey of India. Delhi: Low Price Publications.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1995The converb as a cross-linguistically valid category. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–56. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter Edwin
1991The emergence of perfective aspect in Indo-Aryan languages. In: Elizabeth Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 59–89. vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar
1993 Aspectogenesis and the compound verb in Indo-Aryan. In: Manindra K. Verma (ed.) Complex predicates in South Asian languages, 97–114New Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar
Hutt, Michael
1997Modern literary Nepali. An introductory reader. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Rafał.
2015IATagger. [URL]
Jha, Subhadra
1958 [1985]The Formation of the Maithili Language. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars
1992Periodische Kettensätze im Türkischen. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes. 82. 201–211.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna
1981On the syntax, semantics and pragmatics of the conjunctive participle in Hindi-Urdu. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 11:2. 35–49.Google Scholar
Kellog Samuel H.
1875 [1972]A Grammar of the Hindi Language. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.Google Scholar
Khokhlova, Ludmila V.
1992Trends in the development of ergativity in New Indo-Aryan. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 18. 71–89.Google Scholar
1995The Development of patient-oriented constructions in late Western NIA Languages. Osmania Papers in Linguistics 21, 15–51.Google Scholar
2006Sintaktičeskaja evolucija zapadnych novoindijskich jazykov v 15–20 vv. [Syntactic evolution of Western New Indo-Aryan languages in 15–20 c.]. In: Dybo et al.. (eds.), Aspekty komparativistiki [Aspects of comparative studies], 151–186. Moskva: Rosijskij Gosudarstvennyj Gumanitarnyj Universitet (Orientalia et Classica: Trudy Instituta Vostočnych Kultur i Antičnosti: Vypusk VIII).Google Scholar
Masica, Colin
1976Defining a linguistic area. South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Miltner, Vladimir
1995Old Hindi Reader. Prague: Karolinum – Charles University Press.Google Scholar
Oberlies, Thomas
2005A Historical Grammar of Hindi. Grazer Vergleichende Arbeiten, Band 19. Graz: Leykam.Google Scholar
Pokharel, Bālkr̥ṣṇa.
1964Pāñca śaya varṣa [Five hundred years]. Lalitpur: Jagadambāprakāśan.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, Gustav John
(1903): Über die Konjugation des Khalkha-Mongolischen. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Saksena, Baburam
1971 [1937] Evolution of Awadhi. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Slade, Benjamin
2013The diachrony of light and auxiliary verbs in Indo-Aryan. Diachronica 30(4): 531–578.Google Scholar
Stroński, Krzysztof
2009On the origin of the ergative postposition in Hindi. Rocznik Orientalistyczny LXII/1: 175–186.Google Scholar
2011Synchronic and diachronic aspects of ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Stroński, Krzysztof & Tokaj, Joanna
2015The diachrony of cosubordination – lessons from Indo-Aryan. Paper presented at the 31st South Asian Languages Analysis Roundtable (SALA-31), Lancaster 14–16 May 2015. Extended abstract available at: [URL].
Subbarao, Kurumuri V.
2012South Asian languages: A syntactic typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Śukla, Prabhākar.
1965Jāyasī kī bhāṣā [The language of Jayasi]. Lakhnaū: Lakhnaū Viśvavidyālay.Google Scholar
Tessitori, Luigi P.
1914–16Notes on the Grammar of the Old Western Rajasthani with Special Reference to Apabhramsa and to Gujarati and Marwari. Indian Antiquary 43:5.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, Bertil
1987The Sanskrit Gerund: A Synchronic. Diachronic and Typological Analysis, Studia Orientalia, 62, Helsinki.Google Scholar
1995Burushaski converbs in their South and Central Asian areal context. In Martin Haspelmath & Ekkehard König (eds.), Converbs in cross-linguistic perspective, 487–528. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje
2013Alignment and ergativity in the New Indo-Aryan languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verma Manindra K. and K. P. Mohanan
(eds.) 1990Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford University: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Wallace, William
1982The evolution of ergative syntax in Nepali. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 12:2. 147–211.Google Scholar

Primary sources

Bhānāvat, Narendra and Kamal, Lakshmi
(eds.) 1997–1998Rājasthānī gadya: vikās aur prakāś [Rajasthani prose: development and publicity], Āgrā: Śrīrām Mehrā end Kampanī. (R.G.)Google Scholar
Gautam Manmohan
1954Jāyasī granthavalī. Dehli: Rigal Buk Ḍipo. (J.)Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Jaworski, Rafał & Krzysztof Stroński
2020. Experiments with Automatic and Semi-automatic Detection of Sparse Word Forms in Old Braj. In Human Language Technology. Challenges for Computer Science and Linguistics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12598],  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Stroński, Krzysztof & Leonid Kulikov
2021. Typology and diachrony of converbs in Indo-Aryan. Diachronica 38:3  pp. 457 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.