References
Algeo, J.
(1995) Having a look at the expanded predicate. In B. Aarts & C. F. Meyer (Eds.), The verb in contemporary English: Theory and description (pp. 203–17). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allerton, D. J.
(2002) Stretched verb constructions in English. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Albert, R. & Barabasi, A.
(2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borin, L., M. Forsberg, & J. Roxendal
(2012) Korp – the corpus infrastructure of Språkbanken. Proceedings of LREC 2012, 474–478. Istanbul: ELRA.Google Scholar
Bowern, C.
(2008) The diachrony of complex predicates. Diachronica, 25, 161–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J. & M. Akimoto
(Eds.) (1999) Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L. J.
(2008) Where grammar and lexis meet. In E. Seoane & M. J. López-Couso (Eds.), Theoretical and empirical issues in grammaticalization (pp. 33–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, M.
(2010) The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In A. Mengistu, B. Baker, & Mark Harvey (Eds.), Complex predicates in cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 48–78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, M. & Lahiri, A.
(2013) Diachronic pertinacity of light verbs. Lingua, 135, 7–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinková, S.
(2009a) A contrastive lexical description of basic verbs. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 92: 21–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009b) Words that matter: towards a Swedish-Czech colligational dictionary of basic verbs. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Prague.Google Scholar
Claridge, C.
(2000) Multi-word verbs in early Modern English: A corpus-based study. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V.
(1995) The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delsing, L.-O.
(1998) Support verbs and the argument rule. In K. van Durme & L. Schløser (Eds.), Studies in Valency IV (pp. 63–88). Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
Dura, E.
(1997) Substantiv och stödverb. Göteborg: Institutionen för svenska språket.Google Scholar
Easley, D. & Kleinberg, J.
(2010) Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ekberg, L.
(1993) Verbet ta i metaforisk och grammatikaliserad användning. Språk och stil, 3, 105–139.Google Scholar
Elenbaas, M.
(2013) The synchronic and diachronic status of English light verbs. Linguistic Variation, 13, 48–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giry-Schneider, J.
(1987) Les prédicats nominaux en français: les phrases simples à verbe support. Geneva: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Hills, T. T., Maouene, M., Maouene, J., Sheya, A. & Smith, L.
(2009) Longitudinal analysis of early semantic networks: preferential attachment or preferential acquisition? Psychological science, 20(6), 729–739. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hiltunen, R.
(1983) The decline of the prefixes and the beginnings of the English phrasal verb: The evidence from some Old and Early Middle English texts. Vol. 160 Turku: Turun yliopisto.Google Scholar
(1999) Verbal phrases and phrasal verbs. In L. J. Brinton, & M. Akimoto (Eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English (pp. 167–206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höder, S.
(2010) Sprachausbau im Sprachkontakt: Syntaktischer Wandel im Altschwedischen. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.Google Scholar
Iglesias-Rábade, L.
(2001) Composite predicates in Middle English with the verbs nimen and taken. Studia Neophilologica, 73, 143–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O.
(1942) A modern English grammar on historical principles VI. Copenhagen: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kytö, M.
(1999) Collocational and idiomatic aspects of verbs in Early Modern English. In L. J. Brinton & M. Akimoto (Eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English (pp. 167–206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, E.
(2007) Gränsöverskridande koordination. Syntaktisk förändring i äldre svenska. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Magurran, A. E.
(2013) Measuring biological diversity. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, M.
(1999) Composite Predicates in Middle English. In L. J. Brinton & M. Akimoto (Eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English (pp. 59–96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maouene, J., Laakso, A. & Smith, L. B.
(2011) Object associations of early-learned light and heavy English verbs. First Language, 31, 109–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nickel, G.
(1978) Complex verbal structures in English. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 6, 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ninio, A.
(1999) Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity. Journal of child language, 26, 619–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pettersson, G.
(1996) Svenska språket under sjuhundra år: en historia om svenskan och dess utforskande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Pinker, S.
(1984) Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Polenz, P. von
(1987) Funktionsverben, Funktionsverbgefüge und Verwandtes. Vorschläge zur satzsemantischen Lexikographie. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik, 15, 169–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & Svartvik, J.
(1985) A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ronan, P.
(2014) Light verb constructions in the history of English. In K. Davidse, C. Gentens, L. Ghesquière & L. Vandelanotte (Eds.), Corpus interrogation and grammatical patterns (pp. 15–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.Google Scholar
Sundquist, J. D.
(2018) A diachronic analysis of light verb constructions in Old Swedish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 30(3), 260–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Theakston, A. L., Lieven, E. V., Pine, J. M. & Rowland, C. F.
(2004) Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax. Journal of child language, 31, 61–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(1999) A historical overview of complex predicate types. In L. J. Brinton and M. Akimoto (Eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English (pp. 239–260). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viberg, Å.
(1990) Svenskans lexikala profil. Svenskans beskrivning, 17, 10–1.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, A.
(1982) Why can you have a drink when you can’t *have an eat? Language, 58, 753–799. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sundquist, John D.
2020. Productivity, richness, and diversity of light verb constructions in the history of American English. Journal of Historical Linguistics 10:3  pp. 349 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.