Part of
Advances in Iranian Linguistics
Edited by Richard K. Larson, Sedigheh Moradi and Vida Samiian
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 351] 2020
► pp. 5784
Aijmer, Karin
1997 I think – an English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives, 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C. & Nadya Vinokurova
2009On agent nominalizations and why they are not like event nominalizations. Language 85. 517–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateni, Mohammad R.
2010Application of ke, dige, akhe, ha . Bukhara Arts and Culture Journal 70. 38–51. Translated by Sharareh Esmaeili.Google Scholar
Berger, Frauke & Barbara Höhle
2012Restrictions on addition: Children’s interpretation of the focus particles auch (also) and nur (only) in German. Journal of Child Language 39. 383–410. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Darzi, Ali
2008On the vP analysis of Persian finite control constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 39. 103–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
Diewald, Gabriele
2013Same same but different” – Modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization. In Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie & Paola Pietrandrea (eds.), Discourse markers and modal particles, 19–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf Noyer
2007Distributed morphology and the syntax morphology interface. In Gillian Ramchand & Kurt Rice (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces, 289–324. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erman, Britt & Ulla-Britt Kostinas
1993Pragmaticalization: The case of ba’ and you know . Studier i Modernsprakvetenskap 10. 76–93.Google Scholar
Estaji, Azam
2011 [1389]A historical study of homophonous ke in Persian. Journal of Linguistics and Dialects of Khorasan 2:3. 1–13. Translated by Sharareh Esmaeili.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana
2016Toward a typology for additive markers. Lingua 180. 69–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gawne, Lauren & Vaughan, Jill
2011I can haz language play: The construction of language and identity in LOLspeak. In Maïa Ponsonnet, Loan Dao & Margit Bowler (eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Australian Linguistic Society Conference, Canberra ACT, 2–4 December 2011, 97–122, ANU Research Repository. [URL] (12 June 2017).
van Gelderen, Elly
2004Grammaticalization as economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011The linguistic cycle. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghaniabadi, Saeed
2009The empty noun construction in Persian. Winnipeg, MB: University of Manitoba dissertation.Google Scholar
Ghomeshi, Jila
1997Non-projecting nouns and the ezafe construction in Persian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15. 729–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Control and Thematic Agreement. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 46. 9–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Plural marking, indefiniteness, and the noun phrase. Studia Linguistica 57. 47–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013The syntax of pragmaticalization. In Shan Luo (ed.), Actes du congrès annuel de l’Association canadienne de linguistique 2013. Proceedings of the 2013 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. [URL] (19 November 2013).
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth L. Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, 111–76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2004Coordinating constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard David
1987On the motivation for an evolutionary typology of sound-structural rules. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan
2000On the derivationality of some inflectional affixes in Persian. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America Conference , Chicago, January 2000.
2019Word-internal modification: The case of Persian comparative marker. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 64. 138–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karvovskaya, Lena
2013‘Also’ in Ishkashimi: Additive particle and sentence connector. In Felix Bildhauer & Mira Grubic (eds.), Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 17, 75–97.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1991The meaning of focus particles: A comparative perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin, & John Whitman
2011Afterword: Nominalizations in syntactic theory. Lingua 121. 1297–1313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazard, Gilbert
1992 [1957]A grammar of contemporary Persian. Costa Mesa, CA: Mazda Publishers. (Translated from the original 1957 version entitled Grammaire du persan contemporain by Shirley A. Lyon.)Google Scholar
1989Le persan. In Rüdiger Schmitt (ed.), Compendium Linguarum Iranicarum, 263–293. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Lichtenberk, Frantisek
1991Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language 67. 475–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, William & John Archibald
2016Contemporary linguistic analysis: An introduction, 8th edn. Toronto: Pearson Canada, Inc.Google Scholar
Oroji, Mohammad Reza & Amir Rezaei
2013Exploring ke as a focus particle in Persian from both form and function points of view. Australian Journal of Linguistics 33. 76–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perry, John R.
2007Persian morphology. In Alan S. Kaye (ed.), Morphologies of Asia and Africa, 975–1019. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou
1999A Formal Approach to ‘Grammaticalization’. Linguistics 37. 1011–1041. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütze, Carson T.
2001On Korean Case stacking: The varied functions of the particles ka and lul . Linguistic Review 18. 193–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Jae Jung
1997The so-called plural copy in Korean as a marker of distribution and focus. Journal of Pragmatics 27. 203–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stilo, Donald
2004Coordination in three Western Iranian languages: Vafsi, Persian and Gilaki. In Martin Haspelmath (ed.), Coordinating constructions (Typological Studies in Language 58), 269–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R.
2003Polysemy’s paradoxes. Language Sciences 25. 637–655. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2007Discussion article: Discourse markers, modal particles, and contrastive analysis, synchronic and diachronic. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6. 139–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2008A constructional approach to lexicalization processes in the history of English: Evidence from possessive constructions. Word Structure 1(2). 156–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie
2011‘I think’ and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49. 295–332.Google Scholar
Windfuhr, Gernot L.
1979Persian grammar: History and state of its study. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Dashti, Seyed Mohammad Sadegh, Amid Khatibi Bardsiri & Mehdi Jafari Shahbazzadeh
2024. PERCORE: A Deep Learning-Based Framework for Persian Spelling Correction with Phonetic Analysis. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 17:1 DOI logo
Okubo, Wataru & Hiroki Nomoto
2023. Chapter 9. A null stem analysis of Persian copular verbs. In Advances in Iranian Linguistics II [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 361],  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.