Chapter 9
Another look at Persian rā
A single formal analysis of a multi-functional morpheme
The morpheme -rā has typically been analyzed as an instance of differential object marking, appearing on direct objects that are definite or in some sense specific. In this chapter, we discuss several cases in which -rā may appear on DPs that are not direct objects. Building on insights from dependent case theory (Marantz 1991; Baker & Vinokurova 2010, Preminger 2011, 2014, Kornfilt & Preminger 2014), we develop an analysis of -rā, according to which it is the realization of accusative case, treated as a dependent case assigned in syntax, and a specificity feature. In addition to accounting for the facts discussed in the context of Modern Persian, we show how an extension of our analysis can account for the distribution of -rā in Classical Modern Persian.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data
- 3.Theoretical background
- 4.Analysis
- 5.Prediction
- 6.Classical Modern Persian
- 7.Concluding remarks
-
Notes
-
References
References (35)
References
Baker, Mark. 2017. Structural case: A realm of syntactic microparameters. In Simin Karimi & Massimo Piattelli-Montabelli (eds.), Parameters, what are they, where are they? Special issue of Linguistic Analysis. 41(3/4). 191–240.
Baker, Mark & Nadya Vinokurova. 2010. Two modalities of Case assignment: Case in Sakha. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28. 593–642.
Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2007. Unaccusativity and case licensing. Talk presented at McGill University.
Browne, Wayles. 1970. More on definiteness marker: Interrogatives in Persian. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 359–563.
Brunner, Christopher Joseph. 1977. A syntax of western Middle Iranian (Vol. 3). New York: Caravan Books.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Bare plural subjects and the derivation of logical representations. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 353–380.
Enç, Murvet. 1991. The semantics of specificity. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 1–25.
Freeze, Ray. 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language, 68:3. 553–595.
Ghomeshi, Jila. 1996. Projection and inflection: A study of Persian phrase structure. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.
Ghomeshi, Jila. 1997. Topics in Persian VPs. Lingua, 102(2). 133–167.
Guéron, Jacqueline. 1995. On have and be. In Proceedings-NELS 25. 191–206. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events and licensing. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts dissertation.
Holmberg, Anders & Urpo Nikanne. 2002. Expletives, subjects, and topics in Finnish. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives, and the EPP, 71–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan. 2014. Revisiting the Persian Ezafe construction: A roll-up movement analysis. Lingua 150. 1–24.
Karimi, Simin. 1989. Aspects of Persian syntax: Specificity and the theory of grammar. Seattle, WA: University of Washington dissertation.
Karimi, Simin. 1990. Obliqueness, specificity, and discourse functions. Linguistic Analysis 20(3/4). 139–191.
Karimi, Simin. 1997. Persian complex verbs: Idiomatic or compositional. Lexicology 3(2). 273–318.
Karimi, Simin. 2005. A Minimalist approach to scrambling: Evidence from Persian. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Karimi, Simin & Mike Brame. 2013. A generalization concerning the Ezafe construction in Persian. Linguistic Analysis 38(1–2). 111–144.
Kayne, Richard. 1993. Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47(1). 3–31.
Kornfilt, Jaklin & Omer Preminger. 2014. Nominative as no case at all: An argument from raising-to-Accusative in Sakha. Manuscript, Syracuse University.
Lazard, Gilbert. 1963. La langue des plus anciens monuments de la prose persane. Paris: Klincksieck.
Mahootian, Shahrzad. 1997. Persian. London: Routledge.
Marantz, Alec. 1991. Case and licensing. In German Westphal, Benjamin Ao & Hee-Rahk Chae (eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Eastern States Conference On Linguistics (ESCOL 8), 234–253. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Preminger, Omer. 2011. Agreement as a fallible operation. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Preminger, Omer. 2014. Agreement and its failures. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 68. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rāsekhi, Vahideh. 2018. Ellipsis and information structure: Evidence from Persian. Stony Brook, NY: Stony Brook University dissertation.
Samiian, Vida. 1983. Structure of phrasal categories in Persian: An X-Bar analysis. Los Angeles, CA: University of California dissertation.
Samiian, Vida. 1994. The Ezafe construction: Some implications for the theory of X-bar syntax. In Mehdi Marashi (ed.), Persian studies in North America: Studies in honor of Mohammad Ali Jazayery, 17–42. Bethesda, MD: Iranbooks.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Moezzipour, Farhad & Neda Moezzipour
Pastor, Dorian, Agnes Korn & Christian Rammer
2024.
Colloquial Persian: Towards a New Rise of Simple Verbs?1.
Transactions of the Philological Society 122:1
► pp. 21 ff.
Karimi, Simin, Narges Nematollahi, Roya Kabiri & Jian Gang Ngui
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.