Cover not available
Part of
Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond
Edited by Robert Crellin and Thomas Jügel
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 352] 2020
► pp. 49–94

Chapter 3
Celtic past tenses past and present

| Studienhaus für Keltische Sprachen und Kulturen (SKSK), Königswinter
Past tense marked for perfective aspect, resultative, or other typical features of grammatical perfect forms is clearly in evidence in all of the modern Celtic languages, although not normally listed in the standard paradigms. An overview of usages in the modern languages will be given here, the major structures being of fairly recent origin. The formal structure is periphrastic throughout, divided between an older type employing the preposition ‘after’, and a newer one which shows some resemblance to the have-perfects in many other European languages. In agreement with previous authors, these major formal types will be referred to as p1 and p2 respectively. As the question of active vs. passive is crucial here, this side of the matter will be discussed to some extent, as will be the issue of syntactically reduced structures containing traces of a perfect tense. Questions of contact-induced change will not be addressed in this descriptive overview, except on some minor points. Given the grammatical and semantic complexity of this matter, with different developments over six literary languages and a multitude of dialectal varieties, the early (pre)history will not be discussed in much detail here.
Keywords: analytic [vs. synthetic], have-perfect, simple past, recent past, passive
Article outline
  • 1.Preliminaries
    • 1.1Overview
    • 1.2Typological features of Celtic verbs
  • 2.‘After’-perfect (p1)
    • 2.1General structure
    • 2.2Earlier stages
    • 2.3Function
    • 2.4Current usage
    • 2.5Incompatibility
    • 2.6Hiberno-English
    • 2.7Scottish Gaelic
    • 2.8Manx
    • 2.9Welsh
  • 3. p2: have-perfect
    • 3.1General structure
    • 3.2Possessive character
    • 3.3Related structures
    • 3.4Definiteness, relevance and proximity
    • 3.5Options and constraints
    • 3.6Paradigmatic environment
    • 3.7Evolution/Contacts
    • 3.8Combination of p1 & p2
    • 3.9 have-perfect in Eastern Gaelic
    • 3.10 have-perfect in Breton
  • 4.Voice
    • 4.1From ‘passive’ to ‘autonomous’
    • 4.2 p2 as passive
      • 4.2.1Previous views
      • 4.2.2Agentive clause
      • 4.2.3‘Have’ again
      • 4.2.4Textual features
      • 4.2.5Verbal noun versus verbal adjective
    • 4.3Passive in p1
      • 4.3.1Irish
      • 4.3.2Scottish Gaelic
      • 4.3.4Welsh
      • 4.3.5Breton
  • 5.Derived tenses: Anteriority and Posteriority
  • 6.Non-finite perfect equivalents
    • 6.1 do/i ‘to’ as agent marker
    • 6.2Small clauses with agus
    • 6.3Obsolete iar > ar
  • 7.Phrasal verbs
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 23 September 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.352.03wig
References (49)
References
Ball, Martin J. (ed.). 1993. The Celtic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baudiš, Josef. 1913. Zum Gebrauch der Verbalnomina im Irischen. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie 9. 380–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broderick, George. 1984. A handbook of Late Spoken Manx. Vol. I: Grammar and Text. (Buchreihe der Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 3). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
. 1993. Manx. In Ball (ed.), 228–285.Google Scholar
Dillon, Myles. 1941. Modern Irish atá sé déanta agam ‘I have done it’. Language 17. 49–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doyle, Aidan. 2006. An fhaí chéasta leanúnach sa Nua-Ghaeilge. In Aidan Doyle & Siobhán Ní Laoire (eds.), Aistí ar an Nua-Ghaeilge in ómós do Bhreandán Ó Buachalla, 145–158. Dublin: Cois Life.Google Scholar
Eshel, Orit. 2015. Narrative grammar and narrative modes in Literary Modern Irish. Jerusalem: Hebrew University Jerusalem dissertation.Google Scholar
Favereau, Francis. 1997. Grammaire du breton contemporain. Yezhadur ar Brezhoneg a-vremañ. Morlaix: Skol Vreizh.Google Scholar
Fife, James. 1990. The semantics of the Welsh verb: A cognitive approach. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Filppula, Markku. 1999. The grammar of Irish English: Language in Hibernian style (Routledge Studies in Germanic Linguistics 5). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Finck, Franz Nikolaus. 1899. Die araner mundart. Marburg: Elwert.Google Scholar
Gillies, William. 1993. Scottish Gaelic. In Ball (ed.), 145–227.Google Scholar
Grant, James H. 1987. The Gaelic of Islay: phonology, lexicon and linguistic context. Aberdeen: University of Aberdeen dissertation.Google Scholar
Greene, David. 1979. Perfects and perfectives in Modern Irish. Ériu 30.122–141.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Hans. 1954. Das Passiv: Eine Studie zur Geistesgeschichte der Kelten, Italiker und Arier. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Heinecke, Johannes. 1999. Temporal deixis in Welsh and Breton (Anglistische Forschungen 272). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Henry, Patrick Leo. 1957. An Anglo-Irish dialect of North Roscommon: Phonology, accidence, syntax. Dublin: University College Dublin, English Department.Google Scholar
Jones, Bob Morris. 2010. Tense and aspect in informal Welsh (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs 223). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Hartmut. 1988. Zu den ’r-Endungen’ des indogermanischen Verbs. Historische Sprachforschung 101. 26–52. [Reprinted in: Peter-Arnold Mumm, Gerson Klumpp & Dieter Strehle (eds.). 2007. Kleine Schriften: Hartmut Katz (Münchener Forschungen zur historischen Sprachwissenschaft 5), 297–323. Bremen: Hempen.]Google Scholar
Lamb, William. 2003. Scottish Gaelic (Languages of the World, Materials 401). Munich: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Lewy, Ernst. 1942. Der Bau der europäischen Sprachen (Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 48.2). Dublin: Hodges, Figgis & Co.Google Scholar
Mac Aogáin, Parthalán. 1968. Graiméir Ghaeilge na mBráthar Mionúr. Dublin: DIAS.Google Scholar
Mac Cana, Proinsias & Dónall P. Ó Baoill. 1997. Gnéithe den Chéasta sa Nua-Ghaeilge. In Anders Ahlqvist & Věra Čapková (eds.), Dán do Oide: Essays in memory of Conn R. Ó Cléirigh, 265–280. Dublin: Institiúid Teangeolaíochta Éireann.Google Scholar
Mac Eoin, Gearóid. 1993. Irish. In Ball (ed.), 101–144.Google Scholar
Mac Gill-Fhinnein, Gordon. 1966. Gàidhlig Uidhist a Deas. Dublin: DIAS.Google Scholar
McCloskey, James. 1996. Subjects and subject positions in Irish. In Robert D. Borsley & Ian G. Roberts (eds.), The syntax of the Celtic languages: A comparative perspective, 241–283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCone, Kim, Damian McManus, Cathal Ó Háinle, Nicholas Williams & Liam Breatnach (eds.). 1994. Stair na Gaeilge: in ómós do Pádraig Ó Fiannachta. Maigh Nuad: Roinn na Sean-Ghaeilge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Nicole. 1999. Agents in Early Welsh and Early Irish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, James. 1970. Aspects of the verbal system of Irish Gaelic. Edinburgh: unpublished M.Litt. thesis.Google Scholar
Ó Cadhlaigh, Cormac. 1940. Gnás na Gaedhilge. Dublin: Oifig an tSoláthair.Google Scholar
Ó Corráin, Ailbhe. 1997. On verbal aspect in Irish with particular reference to the progressive. In Séamus MacMathúna & Ailbhe Ó Corráin (eds.), Miscellanea Celtica in memoriam Heinrich Wagner (Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Celtica Upsaliensia 2), 159–173. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Ó Curnáin, Brian. 2007. The Irish of Iorras Aithneach, County Galway. Dublin: DIAS.Google Scholar
Ó hAnluain, Liam (ed.). 1999. Graiméar Gaeilge na mBráithre Críostaí. 3rd edn. Dublin: Oifig an tSoláthair.Google Scholar
O’Rahilly, Thomas F. 1932. Irish dialects past and present. Dublin: Browne & Nolan.Google Scholar
Ó Sé, Diarmuid. 1992. The perfect in Modern Irish. Ériu 43. 39–67.Google Scholar
. 2004. The ‘after’ perfect and related constructions in Gaelic Dialects. Ériu 54. 179–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ó Siadhail, Mícheál. 1989. Modern Irish: Grammatical structure and dialectal variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Paul. 1995. An introduction to the Celtic languages. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sabban, Annette. 1982. Gälisch-Englischer Sprachkontakt: Zur Variabilität des Englischen im gälischsprachigen Gebiet Schottlands, eine empirische Studie (Sammlung Groos 11). Heidelberg: Groos.Google Scholar
Shisha-Halevy, Ariel. 1998. Structural studies in Modern Welsh syntax: Aspects of the grammar of Kate Roberts (Studien und Texte zur Keltologie 2). Münster: Nodus.Google Scholar
Stephens, Janig. 1993. Breton. In Ball (ed.), 349–409.Google Scholar
Thomas, Peter W. 1996. Gramadeg y Gymraeg. Cardiff: Gwasg Prifysgol Cymru.Google Scholar
Wagner, Heinrich. 1959. Das Verbum in den Sprachen der Britischen Inseln: Ein Beitrag zur geographischen Typologie des Verbums (Buchreihe der Zeitschrift für celtische Philologie 1). Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Watkins, T. Arwyn. 1993. Welsh. In Ball (ed.), 289–348.Google Scholar
Wehr, Barbara. 2012. Die Konstruktion habeo dictum als ‘Adressatenpassiv’ im Lateinischen und Romanischen. In Frédérique Biville, Marie-Karine Lhommé & Daniel Vallat (eds.), Latin vulgaire – Latin tardif: actes du IXe colloque international sur le latin vulgaire et tardif, Lyon, 2–6 septembre 2009 (Collection de la Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée 49, Série linguistique et philologique 8), 389–410. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient et de la Méditerranée.Google Scholar
Wigger, Arndt. 1972. Preliminaries to a generative morphology of the Modern Irish verb. Ériu 23. 162–213.Google Scholar
. 2000. Language contact, language awareness and the history of Hiberno-English. In Hildegard L. C. Tristram (ed.), The Celtic Englishes II (Anglistische Forschungen 286), 159–187. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
. 2002. Zu den sogenannten Echoformen des neuirischen Verbs. In Wolfram Bublitz, Manfred von Roncador & Heinz Vater (eds.), Philologie, Typologie und Sprachstruktur. Festschrift für Winfried Boeder zum 65. Geburtstag (Anglistische Forschungen 286), 411–431. Frankfurt: Lang.Google Scholar
Zimmer, Heinrich. 1901. Grammatische Beiträge 2. Über verbale Neubildungen im Neuirischen. Zeitschrift für Celtische Philologie 3. 61–98.Google Scholar