Cover not available
Part of
Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond
Edited by Robert Crellin and Thomas Jügel
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 352] 2020
► pp. 483–504

Chapter 14
The perfect in Medieval and Modern Greek

| University of Cambridge
The present-anterior/stative function of the ancient perfect placed it outside the core verbal system, which was organised around a binary (perfective/imperfective) aspectual opposition. By the early middle ages the increasingly marginal perfect had disappeared as a functionally discrete category, its role subsumed by the aorist (past perfective), and the notion of continuing relevance determined contextually. The rare pluperfect was also abandoned, though periphrastic replacements continued the overt, if optional, expression of relative-past meaning, a function later strengthened by contact with Romance. A perfect counterpart appeared only in modern times, however, functioning as a past perfective with a compulsory current-relevance reading, but remaining optional in that the aorist still carries present-anterior implications in appropriate contexts. Other periphrases were introduced in later antiquity specifically to express stativity. Most have continued in stative function into Modern Greek, though intense contact with Latin/Romance also encouraged present-anterior and relative-past functions locally at various times.
Keywords: anteriority, current relevance, loss and renewal, periphrases, Romance influence, stativity
Article outline
  • 1.The inheritance from antiquity
  • 2.Perfect and pluperfect in Medieval Greek
    • 2.1Perfects
    • 2.2Pluperfects
  • 3.Perfect and pluperfect in Modern Greek
  • 4.Conclusion
  • 5.Summary
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • Editions of Ancient Greek texts
  • Editions of medieval literary texts
  • Collections of medieval non-literary texts
  • Secondary bibliography
Published online: 23 September 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.352.14hor
References (30)
Editions of Ancient Greek texts
Demosthenes, De Corona: Samuel H. Butcher & William Rennie. eds. 1903. Demosthenis orationes. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon. [URL]. (October 11, 2018.)
Plutarch, Titus Flamininus: Perrin, Bernadotte. 1921. Plutarch. Plutarch’s lives: Agis and Cleomenes, and Tiberius and Caius Gracchus. Philopoemen and Flamininus (Loeb Classical Library 102). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [URL]. (October 11, 2018.)
Editions of medieval literary texts
Assizes B: Σάθας, Κωνσταντίνος Ν. 1877. Ἀσσίζαι τοῦ Βασιλείου τῶν Ἱεροσολύμων καὶ τῆς Κύπρου. In Μεσαιωνικὴ Βιβλιοθήκη, ἢ συλλογὴ ἀνεκδότων μνημείων τῆς ἑλληνικῆς ἱστορίας, vol. 6, 249–497. Venice: Maisonneuve. [15th c.]Google Scholar
Chronicle of the Morea (H): Schmitt, John. 1904. The Chronicle of Morea, Τὸ Χρονικὸν τοῦ Μορέως. A history in political verse relating the establishment of feudalism in Greece by the Franks in the thirteenth century. Edited in two parallel texts from the MSS of Copenhagen and Paris, with introduction, critical notes and indices. London: Methuen. [Reprinted 1967. Groningen: Bouma’s Boekhuis and 2003. Athens: Πελεκάνος] [14th c.]Google Scholar
Chronicle of the Turkish Sultans: Ζώρας, Γεωργιου Θ. 1958. Χρονικὸν περὶ τῶν Τούρκων σουλτάνων (κατὰ τὸν Βαρβερινὸν ἑλληνικὸν κώδικα 111). Athens: Σπουδαστήριον Βυζαντινῆς καὶ Νεοελληνικῆς Φιλολογίας τοῦ Πανεπιστημίου Ἀθηνῶν. [17th c.]Google Scholar
Constantine Porphyrogenitus, On the administration of the Empire: Moravcsik, Gyula. 1967. Constantine Porphyrogenitus. De administrando imperio, 2nd edition (Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae 1). Washington, D.C.: Dumbarton Oaks. [10th c.]Google Scholar
Digenes Akrites (E): Jeffreys, Elizabeth M. 1998. Digenis Akritis. The Grottaferrata and Escorial versions (Cambridge Medieval Classics 7). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [12th c.?]Google Scholar
Don Quixote: Κεχαγιόγλου, Γιώργος & Άννα Ταμπάκη. 2007. Μιχαήλ Τσερβάντες, ο επιτήδειος ευγενής δον Κισότης της Μάντσας. Η πρώτη γνωστή ελληνική μετάφραση. Athens: Εθνικό Ίδρυμα Ερευνών. [18th c.]Google Scholar
Kartanos, Old and New Testaments: Κακουλίδη-Πάνου, Ελένη. 2000. Ιωαννίκιος Καρτάνος. Παλαιά τε και Νέα Διαθήκη [Βενετία 1536]. Φιλολογική επιμέλεια Ελένη Κακουλίδη-Πάνου. Γλωσσικό επίμετρο Ελένη Καραντζόλα. Thessaloniki: Κέντρο Ελληνικής Γλώσσας. [16th c.]Google Scholar
Life of Aesop: Eideneier, Hans. 2011. Äsop – der frühneugriechische Roman: Einführung, Übersetzung, Kommentar, Kritische Ausgabe (Serta Graeca, Beiträge zur Erforschung griechischer Texte 28). Wiesbaden: Reichert. [D 17th c., E 15th-16th c., I 17th c., K 16th c.-17th c.]Google Scholar
Malalas, Chronicle: Thurn, Hans. 2000. Ioannis Malalae chronographia (Corpus Fontium Historiae Byzantinae. Series Berolinensis 35). Berlin: de Gruyter. [6th c.] DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tale of Alexander (rhymed version): Holton, David. 1974. Διήγησις τοῦ Ἀλεξάνδρου. The tale of Alexander. The rhymed version. Critical edition with an introduction and commentary (Βυζαντινὴ καὶ Νεοελληνικὴ Βιβλιοθήκη 1). Thessalonike: Michalopoulos. Athens. [2nd edn. 2002. Athens: Morphotiko Idryma Ethnikes Trapezes.] [16th c.]Google Scholar
Collections of medieval non-literary texts
Cataldi Palau, Annaclara. 2003. Correspondence between Manuel Provataris Scriptor Graecus in the Vatican Library (1556–1571), and some of his fellow scribes. In Charalambos Dendrinos, Jonathan Harris, Eirene Harvalia-Crook & Judith Herrin (eds.), Porphyrogenita: Essays on the history and literature of Byzantium and the Latin East in honour of Julian Chrysostomides, 461–491. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Mertzios, Kōnstantinos D./Μέρτζιος Κωνσταντίνος Δ. 1947a. «Κεφάλαιον Ζ´, ‘Ἐμπορικὴ ἀλληλογραφία ἐκ Μακεδονίας (1695–1699)’», Μνημεῖα Μακεδονικῆς Ἱστορίας (Μακεδονικὴ Βιβλιοθήκη 7), 209–264. Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Mertzios, Kōnstantinos D. /Μέρτζιος Κωνσταντίνος Δ. 1947b. «Κεφάλαιον Θ´ ‘Ἀπὸ τὸ ἀρχεῖον τοῦ ἐν Δυρραχίῳ προξενείου τῆς Βενετίας’», Μνημεῖα Μακεδονικῆς Ἱστορίας. (Μακεδονικὴ Βιβλιοθήκη 7), 266–272. Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Secondary bibliography
Aerts, Willem J. 1965. Periphrastica: An investigation into the use of εἶναι and ἔχειν as auxiliaries or pseudo-auxiliaries in Greek from Homer up to the present day (Universiteit van Amsterdam, Byzantijns-Nieuwgrieks Seminarium 2). Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Bentein, Klaas. 2016. Verbal periphrasis in Ancient Greek: Have- and be-constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chatzidakis, Geōrgiu N./Χατζιδάκις Γ. Ν. 1905–1907. Μεσαιωνικὰ καὶ Νέα Ἑλληνικά (Bibliothēkē Maraslē 286/289). Athens: Sakell. [Reprinted Athens 1997, Athens 2010].Google Scholar
Hinterberger, Martin. 2014. The synthetic perfect in Byzantine literature. In Martin Hinterberger (ed.), The Language of Byzantine learned literature (Byzantio, Studies in Byzantine History and Civilization 9), 176–204. Turnhout: Brepols. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, David, Peter Mackridge & Irene Philippaki-Warburton. 2012. Greek: A comprehensive grammar. 2nd edn. [Revised by Vassilios Spyropoulos]. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holton, David, Geoffrey C. Horrocks, Marjolijne Janssen, Tina Lendari, Io Manolessou & Notis Toufexis. 2019. The Cambridge grammar of Medieval and Early Modern Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey C. 1996. On condition …: Aspect and modality in the history of Greek. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society (The Cambridge Classical Journal) 41. 153–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Greek: A history of the language and its speakers. 2nd edn. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janssen, Marjolijne C. 2013. Perfectly absent: the emergence of the Modern Greek perfect in early Modern Greek. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 37. 245–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucas, Sandra. 2012. Polarizing the future: the development of an aspectual opposition in the Greek future tense. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen dissertation.Google Scholar
Mackridge, Peter. 1985. The Modern Greek language: A descriptive analysis of Standard Modern Greek. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Markopoulos, Theodore. 2009. The future in Greek: from Ancient to Medieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, Amalia. 1988. The history of the perfect periphrases in Greek. Cambridge: University of Cambridge dissertation.Google Scholar
Thumb, Albert. 1912. Handbook of the Modern Greek vernacular. Translated from the second improved and enlarged edition by S. Angus, MA, PhD. Edinburgh: Clark.Google Scholar
Trinchera, Francesco. 1865. Syllabus Graecarum membranarum quae partim Neapoli in maiori tabulario et primaria bibliotheca partim in Casinensi Coenobio ac Cavensi et in episcopali tabulario Neritino iamdiu delitescentes. Naples: Cataneo. [Reprinted 1978. Sala Bolognese: Forni].Google Scholar