Cover not available
Part of
All Things Morphology: Its independence and its interfaces
Edited by Sedigheh Moradi, Marcia Haag, Janie Rees-Miller and Andrija Petrovic
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 353] 2021
► pp. 57–80

Chapter 4
Signs and words

| University of Haifa
Natural sign languages both constrain and expand our understanding of the nature of words. In each modality, words can be used in isolation, have meanings or grammatical functions, and are identifiable by their prosodic form. Such shared properties constrain the universal definition of the word. The differences, such as pervasive simultaneity and iconicity in sign word structure and word formation, compared to linearity and arbitrariness typical of spoken words, expand our conception of what a word can be. Investigation of an emerging sign language reveals just how fundamental the word is to language, and shows how morphological complexity begins as an abstract pattern. Sign languages introduce a tension between constraining and expanding the definitive properties of words, offering a more nuanced understanding of this most basic unit of linguistic structure.
Keywords: sign language, words, morphology, iconicity, simultaneity, linearity, language emergence, Israeli Sign Language, Al Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sign words are similar to spoken words
    • 2.1Constraints
    • 2.2Linear morphological processes
  • 3.Sign words are different from spoken words
    • 3.1Meaningful meaningless parts
    • 3.2Iconically motivated, simultaneous morphology
      • 3.2.1Verb agreement
      • 3.2.2Temporal aspect inflections
    • 3.3Classifier constructions: Hybrids of lexical and gestural elements
    • 3.4Hybrid forms in creative performance: The Ebisu Sign Language Theatre Laboratory
  • 4.Language begins with the word
    • 4.1Words at the outset
    • 4.2Lexical variation in the community
  • 5.The birth of abstract productive morphology
  • 6.Summary and conclusion: What’s in a word?
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 25 August 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.353.04san
References (70)
References
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Morphology by itself, stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Wendy Sandler. 2003. Classifier constructions and morphology in two sign languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.). 53–84.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir, Carol Padden, & Wendy Sandler. 2008. The roots of linguistic organization in a new language. Special Issue of Interaction Studies on Holophrasis, Compositionality and Protolanguage 9(1). 133–153.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark, Irit Meir & Wendy Sandler. 2005. The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81(2). 301–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Battison, Robbin. 1978. Lexical borrowing in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, Mary. 1990. Word formation in British Sign Language. Stockholm, Sweden: University of Stockholm dissertation.Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1990. Theoretical foundations of American Sign Language phonology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago dissertation.Google Scholar
. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2019. Sign language phonology (Key topics in phonology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Sandra Smith & Martine Zwets. 2013. Framing constructed action in British Sign Language narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 55. 119–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulter, Geoffrey. 1982. On the nature of ASL as a monosyllabic language. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego, CA, December 27–30.
Crasborn, Onno. 2011. The other hand in sign language phonology. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth V. Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 223–240. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark & Kimi Akita. 2017. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53(3). 501–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark, Damián E. Blasi, Gary Lupyan, Morton H. Christiansen & Padraic Monaghan. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19(10). 603–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, Karen (ed.). 2003. Perspectives on classifiers constructions in sign languages. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nick & Steven Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–492. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernald, Theodoreu B. & Donna Jo Napoli. 2000. Exploitation of morphological possibilities in signed languages: Comparison of American Sign Language with English. Sign Language & Linguistics 3(1). 3–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susan & Qunhu Gong. 2010. Variation in East Asian sign languages. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge survey, 499–518. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles D. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203. 89–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, Assaf & Wendy Sandler. 2011. Phonological category resolution: A study of handshapes in younger and older sign languages. In Rachel Channon & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), Formational units in sign language, 177–202. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Adam C. Schembri. 1999. On defining lexeme in a signed language. Sign Language & Linguistics 2(2). 115–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kirby, Simon. 2011. Language as an adaptive system: The role of cultural evolution in the origins of structure. In Maggie Tallerman & Kathleen Gibson (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution, 589–604. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klima, Edward S. & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kouwenberg, Silvia & Darlene LaCharité. 2004. Echoes of Africa: Reduplication in Caribbean Creole and Niger-Congo languages. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 19. 285–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwok, Lily, Stephanie Berk & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2020. Person vs. locative agreement: Evidence from late learners and language emergence. Sign Language & Linguistics 23:12, Special Issue in Memory of Irit Meir, 17–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lepic, Ryan, Carl Börstell, Gal Belsitzman & Wendy Sandler. 2016. Taking meaning in hand. Sign Language & Linguistics 19(1). 37–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, Scott. K. & Robert E. Johnson. 1986. American Sign Language compound formation processes, lexicalization, and phonological remnants. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 4(4). 445–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. American Sign Language: The phonological base. Sign Language Studies 64(1). 195–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2012. Utterance reports and constructed action. In Roland Pfau, Marcus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.). 365–387. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Edward S. Klima. 1990. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research 1. 191–210.Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard P. Meier. 2011. On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3–4). 95–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandel, Mark. 1981. Phonotactics and morphophonology in American Sign Language. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Mathur, Gaurav & Christian Rathmann. 2012. Verb agreement. In Roland Pfau, Marcus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.). 136–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John. 1981. A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12(3). 373–418.Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P., Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.). 2002. Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit. 1998. Syntactic-semantic interaction in Israeli Sign Language verbs: The case of backwards verbs. Sign Language and Linguistics 1. 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. A cross-modality perspective on verb agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(2). 413–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Word classes and word formation. In Roland Pfau, Marcus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.). 77–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, Mark Aronoff, Wendy Sandler & Carol Padden. 2010. In Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds.), Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding, 301–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meir, Irit, & Wendy Sandler. 2008. Language in space: A window onto Israeli Sign Language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 2018. Gesture and sign: Cataclysmic break or dynamic relations? Frontiers in Psychology 9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newport, Elissa L. & Richard P. Meier. 1985. The acquisition of American Sign Language. In Dan Isaac Slobin (ed), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Volume 1. The data, 881–938. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Wendy Sandler. 1999. Prosodic phonology in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 42(2&3). 143–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol A. (2016. Interaction of morphology and syntax in American Sign Language. Routledge Library Editions: Syntax. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Padden, Carol, Irit Meir, Mark Aronoff & Wendy Sandler. 2010. The grammar of space in two new sign languages. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages: A Cambridge survey, 573–595. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Marcus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.). 2012. Sign Language: An international handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy. 1987. Assimilation and feature hierarchy ASL. Chicago Linguistics Society Parasession on Autosegmental Phonology, 266–278.Google Scholar
. 1989. Phonological representation of the sign: Linearity and nonlinearity in American Sign Language. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Temporal aspects in ASL phonology. Theoretical issues in sign language research. Volume 1. Linguistics, 7–36. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. Hand in hand: The roles of the nondominant hand in sign language phonology. The Linguistic Review 10. 337–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Cliticization and prosodic words in a sign language. In Tracy Alan Hall & Ursula Kleinhenz (eds.), Studies on the phonological word, 223–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The syllable in sign language: Considering the other natural modality. In Barbara Davis & Krisztina Zajdo (eds.), The syllable in speech production, 379–408. New York: Taylor Francis.Google Scholar
. 2012a. Dedicated gestures in the emergence of sign language. Gesture 12(3). 265–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. The phonological organization of sign languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(3). 162–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The challenge of sign language phonology. Annual Review of Linguistics 3. 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Mark Aronoff, Irit Meir & Carol Padden. 2011. The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29. 503–543. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Mark Aronoff, Carol Padden & Irit Meir. 2014. Language emergence: Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language. In Jack Sidnell, Paul Kockelman & Nick J. Enfield (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 250–284. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2006. Sign language and linguistic universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff. 2005. The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102(7). 2661–2665. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schembri, Adam. 2003. Rethinking ‘classifiers’ in signed languages. In Karen Emmorey (ed.). 13–44.Google Scholar
Senghas, Anne & Marie Coppola. 2001. Children creating language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science 12(4). 323–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William C. 1960. Sign language structure. Silver Spring, MD: Linstock Press.Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 1986. The classifier system in American Sign Language. Noun Classes and Categorization 7. 181–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taub, Sara. 2001. Language from the body: Iconicity and metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tkachman, Oksana & Irit Meir. 2018. Novel compounding and the emergence of structure in two young sign languages. Glossa 3(1). 136–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie. B. 1993. Syllables and segments: Hold the movement and move the holds!. In Geoffrey R. Coulter (ed.), Current issues in ASL phonology, 135–168. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, Inge. 2012. Classifiers. In Roland Pfau, Marcus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.). 158–186.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
2023. Morphology in Sign Languages. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.