Cover not available
Part of
Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018: Selected papers from 'Going Romance' 32, Utrecht
Edited by Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkoningen and Luisa Meroni
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 357] 2021
► pp. 171–190

Chapter 9
Brazilian and European Portuguese and Holmberg’s 2005 typology of null subject languages

| Universidade de Lisboa
| Universidade de São Paulo
This paper rethinks Holmberg’s (2005) characterization of partial vs. consistent null subject languages (NSL) based on data from Brazilian and European Portuguese, the former a partial, the latter a consistent NSL. The paper proposes that rather than overt morphological distinctions, what is relevant for null subject licensing is the underlying feature specification of the verbal inflection, after agreement between T and a pronominal subject values the relevant person/number/gender/Case feature. Hence, only close inspection of the pronominal and agreement systems of individual NSLs permits an adequate characterization of them, for the same language may behave as a ‘partial’, ‘consistent’, or ‘radical’ NSL depending on the morphological feature specification of its nominative pronouns and T heads.
Keywords: null subjects, consistent/partial pro-drop languages, ellipsis, verbal agreement morphology, pronominal system, feature valuation, feature prominence, person, number, gender, case
Article outline
  • 1.Consistent, partial, and radical pro-drop languages: Questions and aim of the paper
  • 2.A fine-grained investigation on verbal agreement and null subject licensing in BP and EP
  • 3.Null subjects without ‘rich agreement’: Participial clauses
  • 4.Null subjects without ϕ-agreement: Gerund clauses
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 17 December 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.357.09mar
References (37)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Elena Anagnostopoulou. 1998. Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16. 491–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barbosa, Pilar. 1995. Null subjects. Ph.D. Dissertation: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
. 2019. pro as a minimal nP: Toward a unified approach to pro-drop. Linguistic Inquiry 50. 487–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan. 2009. Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Ph.D. Dissertation: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Carvalho, Janayna. 2019. Teasing apart 3rd person null subjects in Brazilian Portuguese. In Ingo Feldhausen, Martin Elsig, Imme Kuchenbrandt & Mareike Neuhaus (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2016. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 30 Frankfurt, 237–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2008. On Phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero, and María Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, João & Sandra Pereira. 2005. Phases and autonomous features: A case of mixed agreement in European Portuguese. In Martha McGinnis & Norvin Richards (eds.), Perspectives on Phases, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49. 115–124.Google Scholar
. 2013. A gente: Pronominal status and agreement revisited. Linguistic Review 30. 161–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Maria Eugênia. 1993. Do pronome nulo ao pronome pleno: a trajetória do sujeito no português do Brasil. In Ian Roberts & Mary A. Kato (eds.), Português Brasileiro: uma viagem diacrônica, 107–128. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.Google Scholar
. 2000. The loss of the Avoid Pronoun principle in Brazilian Portuguese. In Mary A. Kato & Esmeralda Negrão (eds.), Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject parameter, 17–36. Frankfurt: Vervuert-Iberoamericana. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duguine, Maia. 2013. Null arguments and linguistic variation: A minimalist analysis of pro-drop. Ph.D. Dissertation: University of the Basque Country/University of Nantes.Google Scholar
Ferreira, Marcelo. 2000. Argumentos Nulos em Português Brasileiro. M.A. Thesis: Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
. 2009. Null subjects and finite control in Brazilian Portuguese. In Jairo Nunes (ed.), Minimalist essays on Brazilian Portuguese Syntax, 17–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galves, Charlotte. 1993. O enfraquecimento da concordância no português brasileiro. In Ian Roberts & Mary A. Kato (eds.), Português Brasileiro: uma viagem diacrônica, 387–408. Campinas: Editora da UNICAMP.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 533–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009a. Null subject parameters. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.) Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 88–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2009b. The null generic subject pronoun in Finnish: A case of incorporation. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 200–230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2016. Null subjects in Finnish and the typology of pro-drop. To appear in Anne Tamm & Anne Vainikka (eds.), Uralic syntax. [URL]
Holmberg, Anders, Aarti Nayudu & Michelle Sheehan. 2009. Three partial null-subject languages: A comparison of Brazilian Portuguese, Finnish, and Marathi. Studia Linguistica 63. 59–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kato, Mary A. 1999. Strong pronouns, weak pronominals and the null subject parameter. Probus 11. 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lobo, Maria & Ana Maria Martins. 2017. Subjects. In Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax, 27–88. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Menuzzi, Sérgio. 2000. First person plural anaphora in Brazilian Portuguese: Chains and constraint interaction in binding. In João Costa (ed.), Portuguese syntax: New comparative studies, 191–240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nunes, Jairo. 2008. Inherent Case as a licensing condition for A-movement: The case of hyper-raising constructions in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 7. 83–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Remarks on finite control and hyper-raising in Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 18(1). 4. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and surface constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Pires, Acrísio. 2006. The minimalist syntax of defective domains. Gerunds and infinitives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2010. A deletion analysis of null subjects. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 58–87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenkvist, Henrik. 2018. Null subjects and distinct Agreement in Modern Germanic. In Federica Cognola & Jan Casalicchio (eds.), Null subjects in Generative grammar, 285–306. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saab, Andrés. 2008. Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis. Ph.D. Dissertation: University of Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
. 2016. On the notion of partial (non-) pro-drop in Romance. In Mary A. Kato & Francisco Ordoñez (eds.), The morphosyntax of Spanish and Portuguese in Latin America, 49–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle. 2006. The EPP and null subjects in Romance. Ph.D. Dissertation: Newcastle University.Google Scholar
. 2016. Subjects, null subjects and expletives. In Susann Fischer & Christoph Gabriel (eds.), Manual of grammatical interfaces in Romance, 329–362. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simioni, Leonor. 2011. Concordância em construções passivas com argumentos pré- e pós- verbais e incorporação de nomes nus no Português Brasileiro. Ph.D. Dissertation: Universidade de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2014. The Merge condition: A syntactic approach to selection. In Peter Kosta, Steven Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork & Lilia Schürcks (eds.), Minimalism and beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces, 130–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar