Cover not available
Part of
English Historical Linguistics: Change in structure and meaning
Edited by Bettelou Los, Claire Cowie, Patrick Honeybone and Graeme Trousdale
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 358] 2022
► pp. 137–162

Chapter 6
The role of (the avoidance of) centre embedding in the change from OV to VO in English

ORCID logo | University of Oviedo
Authors from Colman (1988) to Ogura (2001, 2004) have discussed the role of Relative Clause Extraposition as a means to avoid centre-embedded structures in Old English, and its relevance as a factor in the change from OV to VO word order, but to date no study has addressed the full extent to which clausal embedding is allowed in Old English, the contexts for its application or its quantitative limits. Based on an extensive corpus analysis, this paper provides evidence about the factors (both language internal and external) that interact in the generation of centre-embedded structures in Old English while providing a reassessment of the role the avoidance of this kind of structures played in the change from OV to VO.
Keywords: Change OV to VO, language processing, clausal embedding, centre-embedded relative clauses, Relative Clause Extraposition, dependency length minimisation theories, Dependency Locality Theory, Early Immediate Constituents, Old English, German
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data, corpus and data retrieval
    • 2.1Database
    • 2.2Methodology
    • 2.3Corpus and data retrieval
  • 3.Analysis
    • 3.1Single centre embedding
      • 3.1.1External factors
      • 3.1.2Internal factors
    • 3.2Multiple centre embedding
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.358.06lor
References (52)
References
Bader, Marcus. Manuscript. Complex center embedded relative clauses in German. 2012. Johan Wolfgang Goethe-Universität. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Bader, Marcus & Jana Häussler. 2012. Constraints on center-embedding as revealed by corpus data. Paper presented at the Formal Linguistics and the Measurement of Grammatical Complexity Symposium, Seattle, WA, March 23–24.
Bernárdez, Enrique & Paloma Tejada. 1995. Pragmatic constraints to word order and word-order change in English. In Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), Historical pragmatics, 217–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & George A. Miller. 1963. Introduction to the formal analysis of natural languages. In R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush & Eugene Galanter (eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology, Volume 2, 269–321. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cichosz, Anna, Jerzy Gaszewski & Piotr Pęzik. 2016. Element order in Old English and Old High German translations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Cecily. 1971. The narrative mode of The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle before the Conquest. In Peter Clemoes & Kathleen Hughes (eds.), England before the conquest: Studies in primary sources presented to Dorothy Whitelock, 215–235. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cloutier, Robert A. 2009. West Germanic OV and VO. The status of exceptions. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Colman, Fran. 1988. Heavy arguments in Old English. In John M. Anderson & Norman Macleod (eds.), Edinburgh studies in the English language 1, 33–89. Edinburgh: John Donald.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Hendrik de Smet & Wim van der Wurff. 2017. A brief history of English syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frank, Stefan L., Thijs Trompenaars & Shravan Vasishth. 2015. Cross-linguistic differences in processing double-embedded relative clauses: Working-memory constraints or language statistics? Cognitive Science 40(3). 554–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuss, Eric & Carola Trips. 2001. Variation and change in Old and Middle English: On the validity of the Double Base Hypothesis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4(3). 171–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68. 1–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Alec P. Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil (eds.), Image, language, brain. Papers from the first Mind Articulation Project Symposium, 95–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Godden, Malcolm. 1992. Literary language. In Richard M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume 1: The beginnings to 1066, 490–535. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John A. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1988. Relative clauses and rebracketing in Old English. In Elmer H. Antonsen & Hans Henrich Hock (eds.), Germanic linguistics II: Papers from the Second Symposium on Germanic Linguistics, 35–55. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
. 1991. On the origin and development of relative clauses in early Germanic, with special emphasis on Beowulf. In Elmer H. Antonsen & Hans Henrich Hock (eds.), Stæfcræft: Studies in Germanic linguistics, 55–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogg, Richard & David Denison. 2006. A history of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hurst, James. 1972. Ælfric. New York: Twayne.Google Scholar
Karlsson, Fred. 2007. Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics 43. 365–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konieczny, Lars. 2000. Locality and parsing complexity. Psycholinguistic Research 29. 627–645. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korthals, Christian. 2001. Self embedded relative clauses in a corpus of German newspaper texts. In Kristina Striegnitz (ed.), 6th ESSLLI student session, August 13–14, 2001, 179–190. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lipp, Frances R. 1969. Ælfric’s Old English prose style. Studies in Philology 66. 689–718.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moerenhout, Mike & Wim van der Wurff. 2005. Object-Verb order in early sixteenth-century English prose: An exploratory study. English Language and Linguistics 9. 83–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogura, Mieko. 2001. Perceptual factors and word order change in English. Folia Linguistica Historica 22(1–2). 233–253.Google Scholar
. 2004. Evolution of word order. Folia Linguistica Historica 25(1–2). 21–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Neil, Wayne. 1976. Clause adjunction in Old English. General Linguistics 17. 199–211.Google Scholar
Otten, Kurt. 1964. König Alfreds Boethius (Studien zur englischen Philologie, n.f. 3). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1999. Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan & Ann Taylor. 2006. The loss of OV order in the history of English. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English, 249–278. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Randall, Beth. 2005–2007. CorpusSearch 2. [URL]
Reich, Peter A. 1969. The finiteness of natural language. Language 45. 831–843. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reich, Peter A. & Carson T. Schütze. 1991. Syntactic embedding: What can people really do? In Barbara Brunston & Tom Wilson (eds.), Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 11(1). 91–97.Google Scholar
Shannon, Thomas F. 1992. Towards an adequate characterization of relative clause extraposition in Modern German. In Irmengard Rauch, Gerald F. Carr & Robert L. Kyes (eds.), On Germanic linguistics: Issues and methods 253–281. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, Robert P. 1977. Motivations for exbraciation in Old English. In Charles Li (ed.), Mechanisms of syntactic change, 291–314. Austin: University of Texas Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, Robert P. & Donka Minkova. 1990. Verb phrase conjunction in Old English. In Henning Andersen & Konrad Koerner (eds.), Historical linguistics 1987, 498–515. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Subordination and word order change in the history of English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax, 367–408. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strang, Barbara. 1970. A history of English. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Struik, Tara & Ans van Kemenade. 2018. On the givenness of OV word order: A reexamination of OV/VO variation in Old English. English Language and Linguistics 24. 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strunk, Jan. 2010. Enriching a treebank to investigate relative clause extraposition in German. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis, Mike Rosner & Daniel Tapias (eds.), Proceedings of LREC 2010, 1911–1917. Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Frank Beths. 2003. York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. Electronic texts and manuals available from the Oxford Text Archive.Google Scholar
Tily, Harry. 2010. The role of processing complexity in word order variation and change. Stanford: Stanford University PhD dissertation.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1992. Syntax. In Ricahrd M. Hogg (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language. Volume 1, The beginnings to 1066, 168–289 Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trotzke, Andreas & Marcus Bader. 2013. Against usage-based approaches to recursion: The grammar-performance distinction in a biolinguistic perspective. Paper presented at the 36 GLOW conference, Lund, April 2–6.
Trotzke, Andreas, Marcus Bader & Lyn Frazier. 2013. Third factors and the performance interface in language design. Biolinguistics 7. 1–34.Google Scholar
Uszkoreit, Hans, Thorsten Brants, Denys Duchier, Brigitte Krenn, Lars Konieczny, Stephan Oepen & Wojciech Skut. 1998. Studien zur performanz-orientierten Linguistik: Aspekte der Relativsatz-extraposition im Deutschen. Kognitionwissenschaft 7. 129–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasishth, Shravan & Richard L. Lewis. 2006. Argument-head distance and processing complexity: Explaining both locality and antilocality effects. Language 82. 767–794. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vasishth, Shravan, Katja Suckow, Richard L. Lewis & Sabine Kern. 2010. Short-term forgetting in sentence comprehension: Crosslinguistic evidence from verb-final structures. Language and Cognitive Processes 25. 533–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waterhouse, Ruth. 1983. The triangular clause relationship in Ælfric’s Lives of Saints and in other works. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Yngve, Victor H. 1960. A model and an hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 104. 444–466.Google Scholar