Part of
English Historical Linguistics: Historical English in contact
Edited by Bettelou Los, Chris Cummins, Lisa Gotthard, Alpo Honkapohja and Benjamin Molineaux
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 359] 2022
► pp. 119142


CD = Collins Dictionary
2012–Collins. Online. Available at: [URL] (4 May, 2019.)
COHA = Davies, Mark
2010–The Corpus of Historical American English (COHA): 400 Million Words, 1810–2009. Available at: [URL] (4 May, 2019.)
LDOCE = Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
2015–Pearson. Online. Available at: [URL] (4 December, 2019.)
2019Oxford University Press. Online. Available at: [URL] (12 October, 2019.)
OED = Oxford English Dictionary (3rd edn.)
2000– Oxford University Press. Online. Available at: [URL] (4 May, 2019.)
Baker, Paul
2017American and British English: Divided by a common language? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1977Meaning and form (English Language Series II). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav, Tony McEnery & Stephen Wattam
2015Collocations in context. A new perspective on collocation networks. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20(2). 139–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Church, Kenneth. W. & Patrick Hanks
1990Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. Computational Linguistics 16(1). 76–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2000Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik, Frauke D’hoedt, Lauren Fonteyn & Kristel Van Goethem
2018The changing functions of competing forms: Attraction and differentiation. Cognitive Linguistics 29(2). 197–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar
2010Structuring the lexicon: A clustered model for near-synonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar & Stefan Th. Gries
2006Ways of trying in Russian: Clustering behavioral profiles. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(1). 23–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Firth, John R.
1957A synopsis of linguistic theory 1930–1955. In John R. Firth (ed.), Studies in Linguistic Analysis, 1–32. Oxford: Philological Society.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
1986On necessary and sufficient conditions. Journal of Semantics 5(4). 275–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th
2003Testing the sub-test: An analysis of -ic and -ical adjectives. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(1). 31–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Howard
1988Words and their meanings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia
2015How to do linguistics with R. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Dilin
2013Salience and construal in the use of synonymy: A study of two sets of near-synonymous nouns. Cognitive Linguistics 24(1). 67–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Dilin & Maggie Espino
Murphy, M. Lynne
2003Semantic relations and the lexicon: Antonymy, synonymy, and other paradigms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, Jan & Pieter Byloo
2015Competing modals: Beyond (inter)subjectification. Diachronica 32(1). 34–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirsman, Yves, Kris Heylen & Dirk Geeraerts
2008Size matters. Tight and loose context definitions in English word space models. In Marco Baroni, Stefan Evert & Alessandro Lenci (eds.), Proceedings of the ESSLLI workshop on distributional lexical semantics: Bridging the gap between semantic theory and computational linguistics, 34–41. Hamburg. [URL] (20 July, 2021)
Pettersson-Traba, Daniela
2021A diachronic perspective on near-synonymy: The concept of sweet-smelling in American English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17(2), 319–349. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Primahadi-Wijaya-R, Gede & I Made Rajeg
2014Visualising diachronic change in the collocational profiles of lexical near-synonyms. In I Nengah Sudipa & Gede Primahadi-Wijaya-R (eds.), Cahaya bahasa: A Festschrift in honour of Prof. I Gusti Made Sutjaja, 247–258. Denpasar: Swasta Nulus.Google Scholar
Sahlgren, Magnus
2006The word-space model: Using distributional analysis to represent syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations between words in high-dimensional vector spaces. Stockholm: Stockholm University Ph.D. thesis.
Samuels, Michael L.
1972Linguistic evolution with special reference to English. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2008Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In Anatol Stefanowitsch & Stefan Th. Gries (eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy, 63–105. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & R. Harald Baayen
2012Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2). 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R.
2003Near synonyms as co-extensive categories: ‘high’ and ‘tall’ revisited. Language Sciences 25(3). 263–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turkkila, Kaisa
2014Do near-synonyms occur with the same metaphors: A comparison of anger terms in American English. Metaphorik 25. 129–154.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar