Chapter 2
A child’s view of Romance modification
Languages vary as to what kind of phrasal categories allow recursive iteration of self-same embedding. Children first learn an embedding rule, then must learn whether the rule can apply recursively or not. However, direct experience of recursive embedding is rare in the input. A study of recursive nominal modification in Spanish show children acquire different types of modification (possession, part-whole relations) at different times even if these are expressed with the same preposition de. This suggest that the domain of rule formulation is narrower than syntactic category (PPs) or even lexical particle (de). Bilingual children show delays in acquiring a first level of embedding rule but not in allowing the rule to be recursive. This suggests that learning recursive modification is not sensitive to the concomitant reductions in input in bilingual contexts. I argue that children learn that embedding rules are recursive by inference from the productivity of simple embedding rules. The evidence on the acquisition of recursive nominal modification points to the limitations of the parameter setting model of syntactic development.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.UG then and now: How generative approaches neglected grammatical learning
- 3.Recursion as a learning problem
- 4.Acquiring recursive NP modification in Spanish
- 4.1Recursion in child language
- 4.2NP internal modifiers in Spanish
- 4.3The complexity and recursion project
- 4.4The Colombia study
- 4.5The bilingual study
- 5.Discussion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Note
-
References
References (75)
References
Antonsen, Karoline & Romina Farhang. 2018. The effect of PP type on recursive modification. Poster presented at the meeting of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada, May 30-June 1.
Berko, Jean. 1958. The child’s learning of English morphology. WORD 14(2–3). 150–177. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brooks, Patricia J. & Michael Tomasello. 1999. How children constrain their argument structure constructions. Language 75(4). 720–38. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Roger & Jean Berko. 1960. Word association and the acquisition of grammar. Child Development 31(1). 1–14. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6. 339–405. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. ISBN: 3-11-017279-8. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1959. A Review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language 35(1). 26–58. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Holland: Foris Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Westport, CT: Praeger.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life inlLanguage, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Eve. 1995. The lexicon in acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eisenberg, Sarita, Teresa Ukrainetz, Jennifer Hsu, Joan Kaderavek, Laura Justice, & Ronald Gillam. 2008. Noun phrase elaboration in children’s spoken stories. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 39. 145–157. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Nicholas & Stephen C. Levinson. 2009. The myth of language universals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32. 429–492. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Everett, Daniel L. 2005. Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Current Anthropology 46. 621–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fitch, W. Tecumseh. 2010. The evolution of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fodor, Janet. 1998. Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 1–36. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Futrell, Richard, Laura Stearns, Daniel L. Everett, Steven T. Piantadosi & Edward Gibson. 2016. A corpus investigation of syntactic embedding in Pirahã. PLOS ONE 11. e0145289. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gleitman, Lila R. 1990. The structural sources of verb meaning. Language Acquisition 1 (1). 3–55. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gleitman, Lila R., Kimberly Cassidy, Rebbeca Nappa, Anna Papafragou & John C. Trueswell. 2005. Hard words. Language learning and development 1(1). 23–64. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldin-Meadow, Susan. 1982. The resilience of recursion. In Eric Wanner & Lila R. Gleitman (eds.), Language acquisition: The state of the art, 51–77. New York: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guasti, Maria Teresa, Anna Gavarró, Joke de Lange & Claudia Caprin. 2008. Article omission across child languages. Language Acquisition 15(2). 89–119. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Han, Chung-hye, Jeffrey Lidz & Julien Musolino. 2016. Endogenous sources of variation in language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(4). 942–947. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hauser, Marc D., Noam Chomsky & W. Tecumseh Fitch. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298. 1569–1579. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heim, Irene. 1991. Artikel und Definitheit [Articles and definiteness]. In Armin von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, 487–535. Berlin: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hunsicker, Dea & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2012. Hierarchical structure in a self-created communication system. Language 88. 732–63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leguin, Ursula. 2017. No time to spare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lidz, Jeff, Susan Waxman & Jennifer Freedman. 2003. What infants know about syntax but couldn’t have learned. Cognition 89(3). B65–B73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David. 1991. How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Limbach, Maxi & Dani Adone. 2010. Language acquisition of recursive possessives in English. Proceedings of the Boston University Conference on Language Development 34. 281–90.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2018. Principles, parameters, and schemata: A radically underspecified UG. Linguistic Analysis 41 (3). 517–557.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marcus, Gary F., Sugumaran Vijayan, S. Bandi Rao & Peter M. Vishton. 1999. Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science 283(5398). 77–80. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markman, Ellen M. & Gwin F. Wachtel. 1988. Children’s use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology 20. 121–157. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moreira-Rodríguez, Antonia. 2006. ‘The book on the table’, ‘The nan in the moon’: Post-modification of nouns by preposition + noun in English and Castilian. Bulletin of Spanish Studies 83(1). 53–72. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevins, Andrew, David Pesetsky & Cilene Rodrigues. 2009. Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85. 355–404. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ninio, Anat. 2011. Syntactic development, its input and output. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pannemann, Maren. 2007. DP acquisition as structure unravelling. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam dissertation.
Paradis, Johanne & Fred Genesee. 1996. Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18 (1). 1–25. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pearl, Lisa & Jeff Lidz. 2013. Parameters in language acquisition. In Cedruc Boeckx & Kleanthes K. Grohmann (eds.), Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics, 129–159. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pearson, Barbara Zurer, Sylvia C. Fernandez, & D. Kimbrough Oller. 1993. Lexical development in bilingual infants and toddlers. Language Learning 43 (1). 93–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., & Anny P. Castilla-Earls. 2016. Adquisición del español como lengua materna. In Javier Gutierrez-Rexach (ed.), Enciclopedia de lingüística hispánica, 213–230. New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Anny Castilla-Earls, Susana Béjar & Diane Massam. 2012. Elmo’s sister’s ball: The problem of acquiring nominal recursion. Language Acquisition 19. 301–11. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Tyler Peterson, Anny Castilla-Earls, Susana Béjar, Diane Massam & Yves Roberge. 2018. The acquisition of recursive modification in NPs. Language 94. 332–359. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Erin Pettibone & Anny Castilla-Earls. 2017. Down two steps: Are bilinguals delayed in the acquisition of recursively embedded PPs? Matraga (Aquisição da Linguagem) 24(41). 393–416. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T. & Yves Roberge. 2014. Development of noun phrase complexity in children. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Insight Grant Program. SSHRC: 435-2014-2000.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Yves Roberge, Alex Lowles, & Petra Schulz. 2021. Structural diversity does not affect the acquisition of recursive embedding: The case of possession in German. Language Acquisition. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T., Castilla-Earls, María Fernanda Lara Díaz, & Erin Pettibone. In preparation. La adquisición de estructuras nominales complejas. University of Toronto.
Pesetsky, David. 2009. Against taking linguistic diversity at face value. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5). 462–465. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pettibone, Erin. In preparation. The acquisition of (non)restrictive adjectives. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto dissertation.
Picallo, Carme. 2012. Structure of the noun phrase. In Jose Ignacio Hualde, Antxon Olarrea & Erin O’Rourke (eds), The handbook of Hispanic linguistics, 263–284. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pine, Julien M. & Elena V. M. Lieven. 1997. Slot and frame patterns and the development of the determiner category. Applied Psycholinguistics 18. 123–138. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pirvulescu, Mihaela, Yves Roberge, Danielle Thomas, Ana T. Pérez- Leroux, & Nelleke Strik. 2014. Bilingual effects: Exploring object omission in pronominal languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17(3). 495–510. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, Stephen. 1984. Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez-Leroux, Ana T. & Yves Roberge. 2018. A way into recursion. In Hollebrandse, Bart, Jaieun Kim, Ana T. Pérez-Leroux, & Petra Schulz (Eds.), UMOP 41: Thoughts on Mind and Grammar (T.O.M. and grammar): A Festschrift in Honor of Tom Roeper, 109–122. Amherst, MA: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberge, Yves, Pérez-Leroux, Ana T. & Anna Frolova. 2018. On recursive modification in L1 French. Languages 3 (6). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roeper, Tom. 2011. The acquisition of recursion: How formalism articulates the child’s path. Biolinguistics 5. 57–86![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roeper, Tom & Jill G. de Villiers. 2011. The acquisition path for wh-questions. In Jill G. de Villiers & Tom Roeper (eds.), Handbook of generative approaches to language acquisition, 189–246. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saffran, Jenny R., Richard N. Aslin & Elissa L. Newport. 1996. Statistical learning by 8-month old infants. Science 274. 1926–1928. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sauerland, Uli. 2006. On the semantic markedness of phi features. In Daniel Habour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds.), Phi-theory: Phi features across modules and interfaces, 57–82. Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sauerland, Uli & Hans-Martin Gärtner. 2007. Interfaces + recursion = language? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Ed. Payot.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sneed German, Elisa. 2008. Input in the acquisition of genericity. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University dissertation.
Snyder, William. 2007. Child language: The parametric approach. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snyder, William, Ann Senghas & Kelly Ihnman. 2001. Agreement morphology and the acquisition of noun-drop in Spanish. Language Acquisition 9(2).157–173. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Syrett, Kristen & Jeff Lidz. 2009. QR in child grammar: Evidence from antecedent-contained deletion. Language Acquisition 16. 67–81. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael. 2000. Do young children have adult syntactic competence? Cognition 74. 209–253. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valian, Virginia, Stephanie Solt & John Stewart. 2009. Abstract categories or limited-scope formulae: The case of children’s determiners. Journal of Child Language 36(4). 743–778. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Widmer, Manuel, Sandra Auderset, Johanna Nichols, Paul Widmer & Balthasar Bickel. 2017. NP recursion over time: Evidence from Indo-European. Language 93. 799–826. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Charles. 2002. Knowledge and learning in natural language. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Charles. 2004. Universal Grammar, statistics, or both. Trends in Cognitive Science 8(10). 449–454. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Charles. 2015. For and against frequencies. Journal of Child Language 42(2). 287–293. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Charles. 2016. The price of linguistic productivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)