Cover not available
Part of
Nominal Classification in Asia and Oceania: Functional and diachronic perspectives
Edited by Marc Allassonnière-Tang and Marcin Kilarski
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 362] 2023
► pp. 200–225

Chapter 7
Gender, classifiers, and diachrony in Khasian

| NTUSingapore |
The Khasian family is striking in exhibiting both grammatical gender and numeral classifier systems, as well as the additional feature of grammatical plural marking within numeral classifier phrases (Rabel 1961; Nagaraja 1985; Ring 2015). Located in the Northeast Indian state of Meghalaya in an area well known as a contact zone for cultures and language groups (Chelliah & Lester 2016), this group of lects belongs to the Austroasiatic phylum, but remains separated from their closest relatives by Indo-Aryan and Tibeto-Burman languages. As gender marking in particular is unusual for Austroasiatic languages, it is currently an open question how this system arose. This paper provides a description of the gender and classifier systems in Khasian varieties as well as an initial hypothesis for how gender developed, based on an ongoing research project among the Khasian group.
Keywords: gender, numeral classifiers, plural, grammaticalization, Austroasiatic, Khasian
Article outline
  • 1.Overview of Khasian varieties
    • 1.1Linguistic context
    • 1.2Outline of this paper
  • 2.Khasian gender
    • 2.1Description of Khasian gender
    • 2.2Gender agreement
      • 2.2.1Khasi gender agreement
      • 2.2.2Pnar gender agreement
      • 2.2.3War gender agreement
      • 2.2.4Khasi subject agreement?
  • 3.Khasian numeral classifiers
    • 3.1Description of Khasian numeral classifiers
    • 3.2Realization of classifier phrases
    • 3.3Plural marking in classifier phrases
    • 3.4Pnar plural marking on the numeral?
  • 4.Gender grammaticalization in Khasian
    • 4.1Time depth of the Proto-Khasian people
    • 4.2Gender variation in Khasian varieties
    • 4.3Classifier variation in Khasian varieties
    • 4.4Sources of gender in Khasian varieties
  • 5.Conclusion
  • ?ack?
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.362.07rin
References (73)
References
Adams, Karen Lee. 1989. Systems of numeral classification in the Mon-Khmer, Nicobarese and Aslian subfamilies of Austroasiatic. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Adams, Karen L. 1991. The influence of non-Austroasiatic languages on numeral classification in Austroasiatic. Journal of the American Oriental Society 111(1). 62–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. A comparison of the numeral classification of humans in Mon-Khmer. Mon-Khmer Studies 21. 107–129.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allassonnière-Tang, Marc & Hiram Ring. 2020. Sociocultural gender in nominal classification: A study of grammatical gender. Indian Linguistics 81(1/2). 43–62.Google Scholar
Bagchi, Prabodh C. 1929. Introduction. In Prabodh C. Bagchi (ed.), Pre-Aryan and pre-Dravidian in India, i-xviii, Senate House, Calcutta: Calcutta University Press.Google Scholar
Baishya, Ajit Kumar & Bashisha Shabong. 2012. Indo-Aryan loan words in Khasi: An introductory note. Global Media Journal – Indian Edition 3(2). 1–11.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 2003. The language of the Modhupur Mandi (Garo). Vol. 1: Grammar. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chelliah, Shobhana & Nicholas Lester. 2016. Contact and convergence in the Northeast. In Hans Henrich Hock & Elena Bashir (eds.), The languages and linguistics of South Asia: A comprehensive guide, 300–309. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contini-Morava, Ellen & Marcin Kilarski. 2013. Functions of nominal classification. Language Sciences 40. 263–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cracroft, William. 1832. Smelting of iron in the Kasya hills. Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 1. 150–151.Google Scholar
Daladier, Anne. 2002. Definiteness in Amwi: Grammaticalization and syntax. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 31. 61–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. A multi-purpose project for the preservation of War oral literature. North East Indian Linguistics 4. 166–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daladier, Anne & Jérôme Picard. 2014. Pnar, Khasi, War and Lyngam (map 1). ([URL]). Accessed: 6 November 2019.
Dasgupta, Probal. 2003. Bangla. In George Cardona & Dhanesh Jain (eds.), The Indo-Aryan languages, 351–390. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Di Garbo, Francesca. 2014. Gender and its interaction with number and evaluative morphology: An intra- and intergenealogical typological survey of Africa. Ph.D. dissertation, Stockholm University.
Diffloth, Gérard. 2005. The contribution of linguistic palaeontology to the homeland of Austroasiatic. In Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 79–82. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dikshit, K[amal] R. & Jutta K. Dikshit. 2014. North-East India: Land, people and economy. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Pamela A. 1996. Numeral classifier systems: The case of Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elwin, Verrier. 1942. The Agaria. London: Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1972. Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers in Language Universals 9. 1–39.Google Scholar
1978. How does a language acquire gender markers?. In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 3: Word structure, 47–82. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Grierson, George A. 1904. Linguistic survey of India. Vol. 2: Mōn-Khmēr and Siamese-Chinese families (including Khassi and Tai). Calcutta: Office of the Superintendent of Government Printing, India.Google Scholar
Grignard, André, S. J. 1924. A grammar of the Oraon language. Calcutta: Catholic Orphan Press.Google Scholar
Gruzdeva, Ekaterina. 2004. Numeral classifiers in Nivkh. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 57(2/3). 300–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gurdon, Philip R. T. 1914. The Khasis. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Haokip, Pauthang. 2009. Noun morphology in Kuki-Chin languages. Language in India 9(11). 110–129.Google Scholar
Hazarika, Manjil. 2006. Neolithic culture of Northeast India: A recent perspective on the origins of pottery and agriculture. Ancient Asia 1. 25–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Prehistoric cultural affinities between Southeast Asia, East Asia and Northeast India: An exploration. In Marijke J. Klokke & Veronique Degroot (eds.), Unearthing Southeast Asia’s past: Selected papers from the 12th International Conference of the European Association of Southeast Asian Archaeologists, 16–25. Singapore: National University of Singapore Press. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd. 2000. Grammaticalization chains across languages: An example from Khoisan. In Spike Gildea (ed.), Reconstructing grammar: Comparative linguistics and grammaticalization, 177–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, E[dward] W. 1934. The Lawa in Northern Siam. Journal of the Siam Society 27. 153–182.Google Scholar
Kakati, Banikanta. 1941. Assamese, its formation and development. Gauhati, Assam: Government of Assam, Department of Historical and Antiquarian Studies.Google Scholar
Kilarski, Marcin. 2013. Nominal classification: A history of its study from the classical period to the present. (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 121.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Konnerth, Linda A. 2014. A grammar of Karbi. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
Kruspe, Nicole. 2015. Semaq Beri. In Mathias Jenny & Paul Sidwell (eds.), The handbook of Austroasiatic languages, vol. 2, 475–516. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, Ernst. 1883. Ueber Herkunft und Sprache der transgangetischen Völker: Festrede zur Vorfeier des Allerhöchsten Geburts- und Namensfestes Seiner Majestät des Königs Ludwig II. gehalten in der öffentlichen Sitzung der k. Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München am 25. Juli 1881. Munich: Verlag der Königlichen Bayerischen Akademie.Google Scholar
Langstieh, B[anrida] T. & B[attini] M. Reddy. 2004. Ethno-historic and linguistic background of Lyngngams and their demographic structure. The NEHU Journal 2(1). 15–42.Google Scholar
Lewis, Emily D. 2008. Grammatical studies of Man Noi Plang. Master’s thesis, Payap University, Chiang Mai.
Luraghi, Silvia. 2011. The origin of the Proto-Indo-European gender system: Typological considerations. Folia Linguistica 45(2). 435–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagaraja, K[eralapura] S. 1985. Khasi, a descriptive analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, Deccan College, Pune.
Nagaraja, K. S. 1993. Khasi dialects, a typological consideration. Mon-Khmer Studies 23. 1–10.Google Scholar
1996. The status of Lyngngam. Mon-Khmer Studies 26. 37–50.Google Scholar
Nagaraja, K. S., Paul Sidwell & Simon Greenhill. 2013. A lexicostatistical study of the Khasian languages: Khasi, Pnar, Lyngngam, and War. Mon-Khmer Studies 42. 1–11.Google Scholar
Olsen, Neil H. 2015. Koho-Sre. In Mathias Jenny & Paul Sidwell (eds.), The handbook of Austroasiatic languages, vol. 2, 746–788. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prakash, Bhanu. 1991. Metallurgy of iron and steel making and blacksmithy in Ancient India. Indian Journal of History of Science 26(4). 351–371.Google Scholar
. 2011. Ancient Indian iron and steel: An archaeometallurgical study. Indian Journal of History of Science 46(3). 381–410.Google Scholar
Prokop, Pawel & Ireneusz Suliga. 2013. Two thousand years of iron smelting in the Khasi Hills, Meghalaya, North East India. Current Science 104(6). 761–768.Google Scholar
Rabel, Lili. 1961. Khasi, a language of Assam. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Rabel-Heymann, Lili. 1976. Analysis of loanwords in Khasi. In Philip N. Jenner, Laurence C. Thompson & Stanley Starosta (eds.), Austroasiatic studies part II, 971–1034. (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 13.) Honolulu: HI: University of Hawaiʻi Press.Google Scholar
. 1977. Gender in Khasi nouns. Mon-Khmer Studies 6. 247–272.Google Scholar
Ring, Hiram. 2014. Nominalization in Pnar. Mon-Khmer Studies 43. 16–23.Google Scholar
. 2015. A grammar of Pnar. Ph.D. dissertation, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. DOI logo
. 2017. Replication data for: A grammar of Pnar. DR-NTU (Data). Accessed: 6 November 2019. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Maps of the Khasian varieties. ([URL]). Accessed: 6 November 2019.
Sanches, Mary & Linda Slobin. 1973. Numeral classifiers and plural marking: An implicational universal. Working Papers in Language Universals 11. 1–22.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. W[ilhelm]. 1901. Die Sprachen der Sakei und Semang auf Malacca und ihr Verhältnis zu den Mon-Khmēr-Sprachen. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde van Nederlandsch-Indië 52(3/4). 399–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Senkuttuvan, Raman. 2010. Speech of Lyngngam. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Shorto, Harry L. 2006. A Mon-Khmer comparative dictionary. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul. 2011. Proto-Khasian and Khasi-Palaungic. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 4(2). 144–168.Google Scholar
. 2018. The Khasian languages: Classification, reconstruction, and comparative lexicon. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Sidwell, Paul & Felix Rau. 2015. Austroasiatic comparative-historical reconstruction: An overview. In Mathias Jenny & Paul Sidwell (eds.), The handbook of Austroasiatic languages, vol. 1, 221–363. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simon, Ivan M. 1989. Loan-words in Khasi: Their pronunciation and orthography. In David Bradley, Eugénie J. A. Henderson & Martine Mazaudon (eds.), Prosodic analysis and Asian linguistics: To honour R.K. Sprigg, 271–282. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Stonor, Charles. 1975. The blacksmith and his forge in the mountains of North-East India. Anthropos 70(5/6). 833–838. [URL]Google Scholar
Suchitta, Pomchai. 1983. The history and development of iron smelting technology in Thailand. Ph.D. dissertation, Brown University, Providence, RI.
Svantesson, Jan-Olof & Arthur Holmer. 2015. Kammu. In Mathias Jenny & Paul Sidwell (eds.), The handbook of Austroasiatic languages, vol. 2, 955–1002. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Douglas. 1976. The nominal plural in Arawak. International Journal of American Linguistics 42(2). 371–374. [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, Vibha. 2008. History of iron technology in India. New Delhi: Rupa.Google Scholar
van Breugel, Seino. 2014. A grammar of Atong. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Driem, George. 1998. Neolithic correlates of ancient Tibeto-Burman migrations. In Roger Blench & Matthew Spriggs (eds.), Archaeology and language II: Archaeological data and linguistic hypotheses, 67–102. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watters, John R. 1981. A phonology and morphology of Ejagham. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, Los Angeles.
Weidert, Alfons K. 1975. I Tkong Amwi: Deskriptive Analyse eines Wardialekts des Khasi. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Zubin, David A. & Klaus-Michael Köpcke. 1981. Gender: A less than arbitrary grammatical category. In Roberta A. Hendrick, Carrie S. Masek & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, April 30 – May 1, 1981, 439–449. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar