Cover not available
Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 11:2 (2020) ► pp.306–334

Managing a suspended course of action

A multimodal study of suoyi ‘so’-prefaced utterances in Mandarin conversation

| University of Alberta

This study explores interactional functions of the connective suoyi ‘so’ and its particular role in organizing talk and activity in Mandarin conversation. Adopting the methodologies of conversation analysis, multimodal analysis, and interactional linguistics, this study examines 14 hours of naturalistic face-to-face Mandarin conversation. An examination of the data shows that in addition to marking results and conclusions, suoyi is also used to preface an utterance as a tying device to manage suspensions, where progressivity of a course of action is halted. Specifically, suoyi-prefaced utterances can be used to return to a pre-prior course of action at the possible completion of a side sequence or frame. When performing the function of return, suoyi-prefaced utterances facilitate the development of the main course of action. This study contributes to our understanding of the interactional uses of linking adverbials from a cross-linguistic perspective.

Keywords: return, connective, interactional linguistics, multimodal analysis
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Suoyi and suoyi-clauses in Mandarin conversation
  • 3.Methodology and data
    • 3.1Methodology
    • 3.2Data
  • 4.Analysis
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 November 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.20011.wan
References

References

Biq, Yung-O.
1995 “Chinese Causal Sequencing and Yinwei in Conversation and Press Reportage.” Berkeley Linguistic Society 211: 47–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina
2006 “Little Words that Matter: Discourse Markers “So” and “Oh” and the Doing of Other-Attentiveness in Social Interaction.” Journal of Communication 56 (4): 661–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Implementing Incipient Actions: The Discourse Marker ‘so’ in English Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5): 974–998. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth, and Margret Selting
2001 “Introducing Interactional Linguistics.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, edited by Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 1–22. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Interactional Linguistics: Studying Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dong, Weiguang
1999 “句势在复句分类中的地位 [The Statuses of Sentence Structures in the Categories of Complex Sentences].” 语言研究 [Studies in Language and Linguistics] 21: 37–40.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Holt
1998 “Figures of Speech: Figurative Expressions and the Management of Topic Transition in Conversation.” Language in Society 27 (4): 495–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fang, Mei
2000 “自然后语中弱化连词的话语标记功能 [Reduced Conjunctions as Discourse Markers].” 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 51: 459–470.Google Scholar
2012 “会话结构与连词的浮现义 [Discourse Structure and Emergent Meaning of Conjunctions].” 中国语文 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 61: 575–585.Google Scholar
Gao, Hua
2019 “Devices of alignment: Suoyi- and Danshi-prefaced questions in Mandarin Chinese TV news interviews.” Chinese Language and Discourse. 101. 36–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Rod
2001 When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Pragmatics & Beyond. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1980 “Restarts, Pauses, and the Achievement of a State of Mutual Gaze at Turn-Beginning.” Sociological Inquiry 50 (3–4): 272–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. Academic Press: London.Google Scholar
1986 “Gestures as a Resource for the Organization of Mutual Orientation.” Semiotica 621: 29–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 Co-Operative Action. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and John Heritage
1990 “Conversation Analysis.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19 (1): 283–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Goodwin
1992 “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, edited by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin. 147–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heath, Christian
1986 Body Movement and Speech in Medical Interaction. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, and Tania Kuteva
2016 “On insubordination and cooptation.” In Insubordination, edited by Nicholas Evans and Honoré Watanabe. 39–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinemann, Trine
2017 “Transitioning between Activities with the Danish Change-of-State Token Nå.” Journal of Pragmatics 1181: 1–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage. 299–345: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen
1994 “Constituting and Maintaining Activities Across Sequences: And-Prefacing as a Feature of Question Design.” Language in Society 23 (1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoey, Elliott
2015 “Lapses: How People Arrive at, and Deal with, Discontinuities in Talk.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48 (4): 430–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth
2010 “The Last Laugh: Shared Laughter and Topic Termination.” Journal of Pragmatics 42 (6): 1513–1525. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth, and Paul Drew
2005 “Figurative Pivots: The use of Figurative Expressions in Pivotal Topic Transitions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 38 (1): 35–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop, Hanneke, and Harrie Mazeland
1985 “Turns and Discourse Units in Everyday Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 9, no. 5, 595–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howe, Mary Locke
1991 Topic Change in Conversation. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
1972 “Side Sequences.” In Studies in Social Interaction, edited by David Sudnow. 294–338. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1984 “On Stepwise Transition from Talk about A Trouble to Inappropriately Next-Positioned Matters.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, edited by Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage. 191–222. Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Alison
2002 “So…?: Pragmatic Implications of So-prefaced Questions in Formal Police Interviews.” In Language in the Legal Process, edited by Janet Cotterill. 91–110. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kendon, Adam
2004 Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, Celia
2013 “Repair.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers. 229–256. Oxford University Press, U.K: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Li, Charles, and Sandra Thompson
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoting
2013 “Language and the Body in the Construction of Units in Mandarin Face-to-Face Interaction.” In Units of Talk – Units of Action, edited by Beatrice Szczepek Reed and Geoffrey Raymond. 343–375. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 “Some Discourse-Interactional Uses of Yinwei ‘because’ and its Multimodal Production in Mandarin Conversation.” Language Sciences 581: 51–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019 “Researching Multimodal Chinese Interaction: A Methodological Account.” In Multimodality in Chinese Interaction, edited by Xiaoting Li and Tsuyoshi Ono. 181–212. Berlin: Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liao, Qiuzhong
1986 “现代汉语篇章中的连接成分 [the Connective Elements in Modern Chinese Discourse].” 中国语文 [Studies of Chinese Language] 61: 413–427.Google Scholar
Local, John
2004 “Getting Back to Prior Talk: And-Uh(M) as a Back-Connecting Device in British and American English.” In Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-Linguistic Studies from Conversation, edited by Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Cecilia Ford. 377–400. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Local, John, and Gareth Walker
2005 “Methodological imperatives for investigating the phonetic organisation and phonological structures of spontaneous speech.” Phonetica 621: 120–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 “Abrupt-Joins as a Resource for the Production of Multi-Unit, Multi-Action Turns.” Journal of Pragmatics 36 (8): 1375–1403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang
1980 现代汉语八百词 [800 Words in Modern Chinese]. 商务印书馆 [Beijing: Commercial press].Google Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie
2007 “Parenthetical Sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 39, no. 10, 1816–1869. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, Harrie, and Mike Huiskes
2001 “Dutch ‘but’ as a Sequential Conjunction: Its use as a Resumption Marker.” In Studies in Interactional Linguistics, edited by Margret Selting and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 141–169. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
2004 “Prompting Action: The Stand-Alone “So” in Ordinary Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 37 (2): 185–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey
2013 “Overall Structural Organization.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers. 257–280. Oxford, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rossano, Federico
2013 “Gaze in Conversation.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, edited by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers. 308–329. Oxford, U.K., Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1992 Lectures on Conversation. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974 “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50, no. 4: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scheflen, Albert
1964 “The Significance of Posture in Communication Systems.” Psychiatry 27 (4): 316–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1982 “Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of ‘Uh Huh’ and Other Things that Come between Sentences.” In Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, edited by Deborah Tannen. 71–93. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1996 “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, edited by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel Schegloff, and Sandra Thompson. 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “Accounts of Conduct in Interaction: Interruption, Overlap and Turn-Taking.” In Handbook of Sociological Theory, edited by Jonathan Turner. 287–321. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg R. Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, et al.
2009 “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 101: 353–402.Google Scholar
Seuren, Lucas, Mike Huiskes, and Tom Koole
2016 “Remembering and Understanding with Oh-Prefaced Yes/no Declaratives in Dutch.” Journal of Pragmatics 1041: 180–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Song, Zuoyan, and Hongyin Tao
2009 “A Unified Account of Causal Clause Sequences in Mandarin Chinese and its Implications.” Studies in Language, 33(1), 69–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jack Sidnell
2005 “Introduction: Multimodal Interaction.” Semiotica (1561): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Su, Danjie
2016 “Grammar Emerges through Reuse and Modification of Prior Utterances.” Discourse Studies, 18(3). 330–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Wei
2016 “Prosody and Discourse Functions of Ranhou: With Implications for Teaching Mandarin Conjunctions at the Discourse Level.” In Integrating Chinese Linguistic Research and Language Teaching and Learning, edited by Hongyin Tao. 145–168. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xing, Fuyi
2003 现代汉语 [Standard Chinese]. 华中师范大学出版社 [Huazhong Normal University Publishing House].Google Scholar
Yao, Shuangyun
2009 “口语中“所以”的语义弱化与功能拓展 [Semantic Reduction and Function Expansion of “suoyi” in Spoken Chinese].” 汉语学报 [Chinese Linguistics] (31): 16–23.Google Scholar
2015 “连词与口语语篇的互动性 [Conjunctions and Interactivity of Spoken Discourses].” 中国语文 [Studies of Chinese Language] (41): 329–340.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi
1982 语法讲义 [Lectures on Grammar]. 商务印书馆 [Beijing: Commercial Press].Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Rautiainen, Iira, Pentti Haddington & Antti Kamunen
2023. Nudging Questions as Devices for Prompting Courses of Action and Negotiating Deontic (A)symmetry in UN Military Observer Training. In Complexity of Interaction, ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.