Cover not available
Article published In:
Lexical semantics towards the big-data era
Edited by Meichun Liu and Chunyu Kit
[Chinese Language and Discourse 14:1] 2023
► pp. 18–49

The Multifunctionality of Mandarin Diào 掉

A cross-linguistic perspective

| Zhejiang International Studies University
| City University of Hong Kong
This paper explores the various functions of diào in Mandarin Chinese as it changes from a verb to a phase marker. As a phase marker, diào provides a natural endpoint to a co-occurring event and indicates completion, which is a distinct function from the perfect marker le. In this shift, the meaning of diào also expands, including ‘falling down’, ‘throwing down’, ‘disappearing’, ‘removal’, ‘completion’ and ‘change of state’. The multifunctionality of diào is the result of grammaticalization along with semantic change and extension. Cognitive mechanisms such as metonymic and metaphoric extensions, pragmatic inferencing, analogy on Verb-Complement structures, and semantic generalization all contribute to the grammaticalization of diào, with further influence from contact with southern Chinese dialects. This paper further argues that the grammaticalization and semantic extension of diào is in accordance with the development of aspectual markers cross-linguistically, reflecting the commonality in human cognition.
Keywords: The Mandarin diào , multifunctionality, semantic evolution, grammaticalization, completive
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Multifunctionality of Diào in Mandarin Chinese
    • 2.1Fall/Drop
    • 2.2Lost/Disappear
    • 2.3Detached/Removed
    • 2.4Completion
    • 2.5Change of State
  • 3.The Nature of Diào in the V Diào Structure
    • 3.1Grammatical Functions
    • 3.2Verb Selection
      • 3.2.1Situation types
      • 3.2.2Semantics
    • 3.3Negative Form
    • 3.4Sentence Completion
  • 4.The Grammaticalization of Diào
    • 4.1The Grammaticalization Process
      • 4.1.1Stage 1
      • 4.1.2Stage 2
      • 4.1.3Stage 3
      • 4.1.4Stage 4
    • 4.2Discourse-Cognitive Mechanisms for Grammaticalization
      • 4.2.1Metonymic and metaphoric extensions
      • 4.2.2Pragmatic inferencing
      • 4.2.3Analogy on VC: Semantic and morphological correlation
      • 4.2.4Semantic generalization of diào over event types
    • 4.3Dialect Contact: The Influence of Southern Chinese Varieties
  • 5.From Motion to Completion: Cross-Linguistic Evidence
    • 5.1 Phie35 and Ka45 in Southern Chinese Dialects
    • 5.2Lexical Semantic Similarities in Other Languages
      • 5.2.1Functional ranges of Korean pelita and Japanese shimau
      • 5.2.2Semantic preference and collocational restriction
      • 5.2.3Generalization and subjectification: Further development of pelita and shimau
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 9 June 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.21016.jin
References (45)
References
Abe, Sayaka. 2007. “Space, time, subjectivity and beyond: the cognitive semantic development of the Japanese marker -te-shimau.” PhD diss., State University of New York at Buffalo.
Austin, Peter K. 2013. A Grammar of Diyari, South Australia (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baik, Junghye. 2016. “On Grammatical Evolution of Korean Displacement Verb Pelita ‘Throw Away’ From a Grammaticalization Perspective.” International Journal of language and linguistics, 11:49–56.Google Scholar
Barcelona, Antonio. 2003. “Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within cognitive linguistics: An update.” In Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, eds. by René Dirven and Ralf Pörings, 207–278. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, and Östen Dahl. 1989. “The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world.” Studies in Language, 131:51–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cao, Jin. 2009. “‘V Diao’ De Yufahua [the Grammaticalization of “V Diao”].” Qiannan Minzu Shifan Xueyuan Xuebao [Journal of Qiannan Normal University for Nationalities], 21:6-21+67.Google Scholar
Chen, Shuhuan. 2010. “Huizhou Fangyan de Wanchengti Zhuci Pao he [ei55 ] [Auxiliaries of Perfect Aspect Pao and [ei55] in Huizhou Dialect].” Huizhou Xueyuan Xuebao [Journal of Huizhou University], 41:8–14.Google Scholar
Chu, Chengxi. 2016. “‘Wancheng’ ‘Youjie’ he ‘Le1’ de Yinxian: Yuyi Jufa yu Pianzhang de Fen’gong Hezuo [A study of ‘Perfectivity’ ‘Boundedness’ and ‘the Looming of Le1’ from the Interface of Semantics, Syntax and Discourse].” In Xiandai Hanyu Yuyanxue zhi Fu: Zhao Yuanren Xiansheng Jinian Lunwenji [Commemorative Essays for YuenRen Chao, Father of Modern Chinese Linguistics], eds. by Chi-on Chin, Bit-chee Kwok, and Benjamin Tsou, 162–172. Taipei: Crane Publishing.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: the Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dai, Yaojing. 1996. “Ganyu Taihe fangyan de wanchengti [Perfects in the Gan dialects at Taihe country].” In Dongci de Ti [Aspects of verbs], ed. by Shuangqing Zhang, 97–113. Hong Kong: T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre, Institute of Chinese Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Gan, Yu’en, and Fang Wu. 2005. “Guangdong Siyi fangyan de ‘jian’ zi ju [‘Jian’ sentences in the dialect of Siyi in Guangdong Province].” Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 21:158–159.Google Scholar
Genetti, Carol. 1986. “The grammaticalization of the Newari verb tol.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 91: 53–69.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth C. Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hu, Zhenhua. 1986. Keerkezi yu Jianzhi [A brief introduction to Kirgiz]. Beijing: Minzu Chubanshe [The Ethnic Publishing House].Google Scholar
Jiang, Shaoyu. 2000. “Hanyu Dongjieshi Chansheng de Shidai [the Times when Chinese Verb-Resultative Complement Emerged].” In Hanyu Cihui Yufa Shi Lunwenji [Collection of papers on the History of Chinese Vocabulary and Grammar], ed. by Shaoyu Jiang, 240–262. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [the Commercial Press].Google Scholar
Jing, Gaowa, and Liping Xia. 2020. “Hanyu Fangyan Quchuyi Biaoji de Duogongnengxing yanjiu [A Study of the Multifunctionality of Removal Markers in Chinese Dialect].” Yuyan Yanjiu [Studies in Language and Linguistics], 31: 46–54.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán, and Günter Radden. 1998. “Metonymy: Developing a cognitive linguistic view.” Cognitive Linguistics, 11: 37–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog, and Seongha Rhee. 2019. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization (second edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Keedong. 1993. A Korean grammar on semantic-pragmatic principles. Seoul: Hangkuk Moon Hwa-sa.Google Scholar
Li, Fei, and Changyan Wen. 2013. “Dabu kejiahua biao wancheng de 撇(phɛt3)” [Completive mark ‘撇(phɛt3)’in Dabu Hakka dialect].” Jiayingxueyuan Xuebao [Journal of Jiaying University], 91:19–24.Google Scholar
Li, Rulong. 1996. “Quanzhou fangyan de ti [Aspects in Quanzhou dialect].” In Dongci de Ti [Aspects of verbs], ed. by Shuangqing Zhang, 195–224. Hong Kong: T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre, Institute of Chinese Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Liu, Meichun. 2015. “Tense and Aspect in Mandarin Chinese.” In The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, eds. by William S-Y. Wang and Chaofen Sun, 274–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Yan. 2007. “‘V diao’ de yuyi leixing yu ‘diao’ de xuhua [Semantic Categories of V Diao and Grammaticalization of Diao].” Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 21: 133-143+191-192Google Scholar
Nayar, Devi. 1983. “Verb Sequences in Malayalam.” PhD diss., New Delhi: Jawaharlal Nehru University.
Ono, Tsuyoshi, and Ryoko Suzuki. 1992. “The development of a marker of speakers attitude: the pragmatic use of the Japanese grammaticized verb shimau in conversation.” In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 181: 204–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi. 1992. “The Grammaticalization of the Japanese Verbs Oku and Shimau.” Cognitive Linguistics, 41: 367–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhee, Seongha. 1996. “Pragmatic inferences and grammaticalization of serial verbs of displacement in Korean.” In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, eds. by Jan Johnson, Matthew L. Juge, and Jeri L. Moxley, 328–339. February 16–19, University of California, Berkeley. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1991. The Parameter of Aspect. Boston: Kluwer Acadamic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Carlotta S. 1994. “Aspectual Viewpoint and Situation Type in Mandarin Chinese.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 31: 107–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Susan. 2003. “Completive aspect, emotion, and the dynamic eventive: the case of Korean V-a/e pelita, Japanese V-te shimau, and Spanish se.” Linguistics, 411:653–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science, 121:49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Richard Dasher. 2001. Regularity of Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2003. “From subjectification to intersubjectification.” In Motives for Language Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 124–139. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. “(Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: a reassessment.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, eds. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte and Hubert Cuyckens, 29–74. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Danrong. 2014. “Lun dongci, Xingrongci hou ‘diao’ de yiyi xuhua [On the semantic bleaching of diao after verbs and adjectives].” Hubei Minzu Xueyuan Xuebao [Journal of Hubei Minzu University], 51:164–168.Google Scholar
Wang, Li. 1958. Hanyushi Gao [the History of Chinese]. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Nan. 2016. “Danyinjie dongci feizizhu yongfa yu xiaoji jieguoyi [Non-volitional use of monosyllabic verbs and its negative-result meaning].” Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 21:228–256.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Kazuha. 2000. “The Grammaticalization of Aspect in Japanese.” Ms. Department of Linguisitcs, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Xia, Liping. 2020. Xiangyu yiyang (Nijiangkou) fangyan cankao yufa [Reference Grammar of Yiyang (Nijiangkou) in Xiang dialect]. Beijing: Shangwu Yinshuguan [The Commercial Press].Google Scholar
Xiang, Mengbing. 1996. “Liancheng (Xinquan) fangyan de ti [Aspects in Liancheng (Xinquan) dialect].” In Dongci de Ti [Aspects of verbs], ed. by Shuangqing Zhang, 48–78. Hong Kong: T.T. Ng Chinese Language Research Centre, Institute of Chinese Studies, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qiyun. 2005. “Yangzhou fangyan ‘xiaojixing’ wanchengti biaoji ‘de’ [Negative perfective aspect marker de in the Yangzhou dialect].” Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese Language], 51:468–473.Google Scholar