Cover not available
Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 5:2 (2014) ► pp.252–280

The inter-sentential function of Mandarin bei passives

 | The Chinese University of Hong Kong
 | Beijing Language and Culture University
Although the intra-sentential functions of the Mandarin bei passive construction have been well studied, its inter-sentential function has not been well understood yet. In this paper, from a Centering Theory perspective, we demonstrate that the bei passive also bears inter-sentential weights. Specifically, the function of the pre-bei semantic entity is to preserve the Cb from its preceding utterance; whereas that of the bei-object is either to introduce a new Cb or to retain the original Cb so as to step aside for a new one at the pre-bei position. This study also compares the Centering Theory approach with the Givón tradition in discourse analysis and claims that Centering Theory is a more suitable analytical tool of calculating the degree of discourse coherence and portraying the fluency of information flow, whereas the Givón tradition is better treated as a measurement for discourse relatedness.
Keywords: Centering Theory, center transition, bei passive, inter-sentential function, discourse coherence
Published online: 28 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.5.2.06wuy
References (22)
Givón, Talmy, (ed.). 1983. Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guo, Shenglin (郭聖林). 2006. “Beiziju de yupian kaocha 被字句的語篇考察 [A Textual Study of “Bei” Construction].” Hanyu Xuexi 漢語學習 [ Chinese Language Learning ] 61:25–29.Google Scholar
Grosz, Barbara J., Aravind K. Joshi, and Scott Weinstein. 1983. “Providing a Unified Account of Definite Noun Phrases in Discourse.” In The Proceedings for the 21st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 40–50. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
. 1995. “Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse.” Computational Linguistics 21 (2): 203–25.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Amherst: University of Massachusetts dissertation. Published in 1989, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Huang, J. 1999. “Chinese Passives in Comparative Perspective.” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 29 (1): 423–509.Google Scholar
Joshi, A., and Scott Weinstein. 1981. “Control of Inference: Role of Some Aspects of Discourse Structure—Centering.” In The Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 385–387. Vancouver, Canada.
Kameyama, M. 1998. “Intrasentential Centering: A Case Study.” In Centering Theory in Discourse, ed by M. Walker, A. Joshi, and E. Prince, 89–112. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Li, Shan (李珊). 1994. Xiandai hanyu beiziju yanjiu 現代漢語被字句研究 [A Study on the Bei Passive in Modern Chinese]. Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Feng-hsi. 2011. “The Bei Passive and Its Discourse Motivations.” Chinese Language and Discourse 2(2): 198–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang (ed.). (呂叔湘編). 1980. Xiandai hanyu babai ci 現代漢語八百詞. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Myhill, John, and Zhiqun Xing. 1994. “A Comparison of the Function of Voice in Biblical Hebrew, Chinese and English.” Language Sciences 16(2): 253–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, Barbara H. 1989. “Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts.” Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 251:342–365. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Smith, C.S. 2003. Modes of Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Sze-wing (鄧思穎). 2004. “Zuogehua he hanyu beidongju 作格化和漢語被動句 [Ergativization and Chinese passives].” Zhongguo Yuwen 中國語文[Studies of the Chinese Language] 2004 (4):291–301.Google Scholar
(鄧思穎). 2008. “Hanyu beidongju jufa fenxi de chongxin sikao 漢語被動句句法分析的重新思考 [Syntactic Analysis of Chinese Passives].” Dangdai Yuyanxue 當代語言學 [Contemporary Linguistics] 2008 (4):308–319.Google Scholar
Ting, Jen. 1995. A Non-Uniform Analysis of the Passive Construction in Mandarin Chinese. Ph. D. thesis, Rochester: University of Rochester, USA.
. 1998. “Deriving the bei-Construction in Mandarin Chinese.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7(4): 319–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra. A. 1987. “The Passive in English: A Discourse Perspective.” In Honor of Ilse Lehiste, ed by Robert Channon, and Linda Shockey, 497–511. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Walker, M.A., A.K. Joshi, and E.F. Prince (eds). 1998. Centering Theory in Discourse. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Xing, Z. 1990. Discourse Function in Mandarin: A Quantitative Study of Five Major Constructions. University of Michigan MA thesis.
Xiong, Zhongru (熊仲儒). 2003. “Hanyu beidongju jufa jiegou fenxi 漢語被動句句法結構分析 [The syntactic structure of passive sentences in Mandarin Chinese].” Dangdai Yuyanxue 當代語言學 [Contemporary Linguistics], 2003(4): 308–319.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Wuyun, Saina & Haihua Pan
2021. 漢語語篇中語義實體的篇章可及性. Language and Linguistics. 語言暨語言學 22:3 ► pp. 440 ff. DOI logo
Hu, Xiaoshi
2020. Syntax of causative-passive correlation from a cross-linguistic perspective. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Wuyun, Saina
2016. The influence of tense interpretation on discourse coherence—A comparison between Mandarin narrative and report discourse. Lingua 179 ► pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
Wuyun, Saina
2020. A Centering Analysis of Discourse with Chinese Bei Passive. In Where Centering Meets Chinese Discourse, ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.