Article published In:
Chinese Language and Discourse
Vol. 6:1 (2015) ► pp.227
Brinton, Laurel J
2000The Structure of Modern English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, Williams, and D. Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan
2005 “The Meaning of Time: Polysemy, the Lexicon and Conceptual Structure.” Journal of Linguistics 41 (1): 33–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green
2006Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1979 “From Discourse to Syntax: Grammar as a Processing Strategy.” In Syntax and Semantics, vol.121, ed. by Talmy Givón, 81–112. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E., and Ray Jackendoff
2004 “The English Resultative as a Family of Constructions.” Language 80 (3): 532–568. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, Chu-Ren, and Shen-Min Chang
1996 “Metaphor, Metaphorical Extension, and Grammaticalization: A Study of Mandarin Chinese –qilai .” In Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, ed. by Adele Goldberg, 201–216. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Huang, Su-miao, and Ching-yu Hsieh
2008 “Grammaticalization of Directional Complements in Mandarin Chinese.” Language and Linguistics 9 (1): 49–68.Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark
1987The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol.11. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson
1981Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Liu, Mei-chun
1997 “Conceptual Basis and Categorial Structure: A Study of Mandarin V-R Compounds as a Radial Category.” In Chinese Languages and Linguistics IV: Typological Studies of Languages in China, ed. by Chiu-yu Tseng, 462–473. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Liu, Yuehua, Wenyu Pan, and Hua Gu
2004Shiyong xiandai hanyu yufa [Practical Modern Chinese Grammar] (Revised and enlarged edition). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lü, Louis Wei-lun
2001 “Metaphorical Transfer and Pragmatic Strengthening: On the Development of V-diao in Mandarin.” Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing 6 (2): 1–10.Google Scholar
Packard, Jerome L
2000The Morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Martha
2000 “Consistent Criteria for Sense Distinctions.” Computers and the Humanities 341: 217–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peña, Sandra Cervel
1999 “Subsidiarity Relationships Between Image-schemas: An Approach to the Force Schema.” Journal of English Studies 11: 187–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, Claudia
1990 “Resultative Verb Compounds.” Journal of the Chinese Language Teacher’s Association 25 (3): 61–83.Google Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek
1998 “What Linguists Can and Can’t Tell you about the Human Mind: A Reply to Croft.” Cognitive Linguistics 9 (4): 361–378. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantics Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, John R
2003Linguistic Categorization (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teng, Shou-hsin
1977 “A Grammar of Verb-particle in Chinese.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics 51: 1–25.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A
1973 “Resultative Verb Compounds in Mandarin Chinese: A Case for Lexical Rules.” Language 49 (2): 361–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C
1989 “On the Rise of Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change.” Language 65 (1): 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Andrea, and Vyvyan Evans
2001 “Reconsidering Prepositional Polysemy Networks: The Case of over .” Language 77 (4): 724–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Ben Pin-Yun
2012 “Usage Effects on the Cognitive Routinization of Chinese Resultative Verbs.” Research in Language 10 (4): 405–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Kermer, Franka
2021. Semantic network of the German preposition hinter . Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2  pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Wei-lun
2015. Conceptual autonomy and dependence in Chinese lexical semantic analysis. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 6:2  pp. 162 ff. DOI logo
Lu, Wei-lun
2022. A Conceptual Exploration of Polysemy: A Case Study of [V] – [UP] and [V] – [SHANG], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.