Conceptualizing shame in Old Romanian
A cultural and historical-semantic analysis
The chapter deals with the conceptualization of a
social-moral emotion, ruşine
[shame], in Old Romanian (16th–18th centuries).
Within an integrative theoretical and methodological framework
(combining elements of Cultural Linguistics, Textual and Cognitive
Lexical Semantics, Cultural Anthropology, Psychology and Sociology
of Emotions), I tackle the patterns of conceptualizing
shame, delineating the prototypical feature
profile, together with its contextual variation, as highlighted by
the counterpart lexicalization. The corpus data bring forward a
complex componential grid. Certain types of shame
can be outlined: (a) dysphoric prototypical shame;
(b) contiguous shame, contextually intersecting
with disrespect, dishonor or
fear; (c) religious shame,
hedonically hybrid, both euphoric and dysphoric, overlapping with
respect and fear; (d)
positive shame, socially validated and decoded
as shyness, modesty, or, in a
romantic love context, as pudor.
Article outline
- 1.Preliminaries
- 2.Theoretical framework
- 3.Shame – definition, description, and
typology
- 3.1Psychological, anthropological, and sociological
perspective
- 3.2Linguistic perspective
- 4.Conceptualization and lexicalization of shame in
Old Romanian
- 4.1Prototypical shame
- a.Violation of norms of physical and moral
integrity
- b.Violation of norms of social integrity
- 4.2Contiguous / hybrid shame
- a.Violation / Loss of laic authority
- b.Violation of religious authority: Religious shame
- 4.3Positive (honorable) shame – shyness/modesty/pudor
- 5.Final remarks
-
Notes
-
Corpus (16th–18th centuries)
-
References