Claiborne, R
(2001) Loose cannons, red herrings, and other lost metaphors. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Deutscher, G
(2002) On the misuse of the notion of `abduction' in linguistics. Journal of Linguistics 38: 469–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, M.S
(2006) Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In F.K. Ameka, A.C. Dench, & N. Evans (Eds.), Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing (pp. 207–234). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, E.H
(1985) Amo, Amas, Amat, and more: How to use Latin to your own advantage and to the astonishment of others. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Enfield, N.J
(2002) Ethnosyntax: Explorations in grammar and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T
(1989) Mind, code, and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Green, G.M
(1996) Pragmatics and natural language understanding, Second Edition (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Grice, H.P
(1957) Meaning. The Philosophical Review, 66(3), 377–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J.L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Volume 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1978) Further notes on logic and conversation. In P. Cole (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 113–128). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
(1989) Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J.J
(1977) Sociocultural knowledge in conversational inference. In M. Saville-Troike (Ed.), Linguistics and Anthropology, Georgetown university round table on languages and linguistics 1977 (pp. 191–211). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
(1982) Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) Contextualization cues and metapragmatics: The retrieval of cultural knowledge. In C. Wiltshire, B. Music, & R. Graczyk (Eds.), Chicago linguistic society 25: Papers from the Parasession on language in context. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
(1992a) Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(1992b) Contextualization revisited. In P. Auer & A. di Luzio (Eds.), The contextualization of language (pp. 39–53). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harman, G.H
(1965) The inference to the best explanation. The Philosophical Review, 74(1), 88–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P
(1987) Emergent Grammar. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 139–157.Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J
(1991) On some principles of grammaticization. In E.C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Volume 1 (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P
(2011) Emergent Grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In P. Auer & S. Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent, (pp. 22–44). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Emergent grammar. In J.P. Gee & M. Handford (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 301–314). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Josephson, J., & Josephson, S
(1996) Abductive inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keller, R
(1994) On language change: The invisible hand in language. (B. Nerlich, Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things. What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
LaPolla, R.J
(2003) Why languages differ: Variation in the conventionalization of constraints on inference. In D. Bradley, R.J. LaPolla, B. Michailovsky, & G. Thurgood (Eds.), Language variation: Papers on Variation and Change in the Sinosphere and in the Indosphere in Honour of James A. Matisoff (pp. 113–144). Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
(2009) Causes and effects of substratum, superstratum and adstratum influence, with reference to Tibeto-Burman languages. In Yasuhiko Nagano (ed.), Issues in Tibeto-Burman historical linguistics ( Senri Ethnological Studies 75 ), (pp. 227–237). Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C
(1995) Interactional biases in human thinking. In E.N. Goody (Ed.), Social intelligence and interaction (pp. 221–260). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipton, Peter
(1993) Inference to the Best Explanation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D.B.M., & Levinson, S.C
(2004) Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 108–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C.S
(1940) Abduction and induction. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 150–156). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D
(1996) Relevance: Communication and cognition, Second Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whorf, B.L
(1956) Linguistics as an exact science. In J.B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Xu, J., Gannon, P.J., Emmorey, K., Smith, J.F., & Braun, A.R
(2009) Symbolic gestures and spoken language are processed by a common neural system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(49), 20664–20669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Bernárdez, Enrique
2016. From butchers and surgeons to the linguistic method. In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Social and Cognitive Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 262],  pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Bernárdez, Enrique
2017. Evidentiality—A Cultural Interpretation. In Advances in Cultural Linguistics [Cultural Linguistics, ],  pp. 433 ff. DOI logo
Feltgen, Q., B. Fagard & J.-P. Nadal
2017. Frequency patterns of semantic change: corpus-based evidence of a near-critical dynamics in language change. Royal Society Open Science 4:11  pp. 170830 ff. DOI logo
Kolodny, Oren & Shimon Edelman
2018. The evolution of the capacity for language: the ecological context and adaptive value of a process of cognitive hijacking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 373:1743  pp. 20170052 ff. DOI logo
LaPolla, Randy J.
2016. Review of Evans (2014): The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. Studies in Language 40:1  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
LaPolla, Randy J.
2017. Noun-modifying clause constructions in Sino-Tibetan languages. In Noun-Modifying Clause Constructions in Languages of Eurasia [Typological Studies in Language, 116],  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
LaPolla, Randy J.
2020. Forward to the past. Asian Languages and Linguistics 1:1  pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Muru, Cristina
2023. Grammatical category versus comparative concept in missionary grammars of Tamil (16th-18th centuries): the description of the relative clause. Language & History 66:2  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.