Cover not available
Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 4:2 (2017) ► pp.330–354

English transitive particle verbs

Particle placement and idiomaticity

 | Lafayette College (USA)
Adopting the Cognitive Linguistic (CL) framework, this study focuses on the particle placement phenomenon of English transitive particle verbs and its relationship with idiomaticity. Construal is argued to play a key role in determining which order a transitive particle verb should take. When a caused motion event or state change event is construed sequentially, the discontinuous order is taken to emphasize the final resultant state of the object. When the holistic construal is taken to view the same situation, the continuous order is adopted to profile the object or the interaction between the subject and the object. The holistic construal requires two conditions. First, the particle has a dynamic sense. It can designate both the process and the endpoint of motion. Second, the final state denoted by the particle is directly caused by the action denoted by the verb. In contrast, the sequential construal is allowed as long as a causal link can be established between the two participants under discussion or between the verb and the state change of one participant. In addition, the present study argues that the particle placement of idiomatic particle verbs depends on the processes in which the particle verb has developed its idiomaticity. If the idiomatic meaning develops from the inference associated with the sequential construal, the discontinuous order is preferred. On the other hand, if the idiomatic meaning is based on the holistic construal, the continuous order is then preferred. Moreover, item-by-item analyses of particle verbs that only allow one order listed in the Collins COBUILD Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs provide corpus-based support to the CL view of the relationship between construal, particle placement, and idiomaticity proposed in this study.
Keywords: particle verbs, particle placement, idiomaticity, construal, cognitive linguistics
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Factors identified by functionalists
    • 2.2 Gries’ (1999) Study
    • 2.3 Dirven’s (2001) Study
  • 3.Particle placement and construal
    • 3.1Sequential construal and holistic construal
    • 3.2Constraints on the holistic construal
  • 4.Idiomaticity and particle placement
  • 5.Corpus-based evidence
    • 5.1Particle verbs that require the discontinuous order
    • 5.2Particle verbs that require the continuous order
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 16 March 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00008.luo
References (29)
References
Bolinger, D. (1971). The phrasal verb in English. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, P. (1986). Discourse and particle movement in English. Studies in Language, 101, 79–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. M., & Gray, L. S. (1999). Going after the particle verbs: An alternative approach to classification. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 65–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dehé, N. (Ed.). (2002). Particle verbs in English: Syntax, information structure and intonation. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamnins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, M. (1995). Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dewell, R. (2011). The meaning of particle/ prefix constructions in German. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, R. (2001). English particle verbs: Theory and didactic application. In M. Pütz & S. Niemeier (Eds.). Applied Cognitive Linguistics II: Language Pedagogy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, V., & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, B. (1976). The verb-particle combination in English. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2007). Pointing out frequent phrasal verbs: A corpus-based analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 339–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. (1990). Psycholinguistic studies on the conceptual basis of idiomaticity. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(4), 417–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2016). Tuning in to the verb-particle construction in English. In L. Nash & P. Samvelian (Eds.), Approaches to complex predicates (pp. 110–141). Boston: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T. (1999). Particle movement: A cognitive and functional approach Cognitive Linguistics, 10 (2), 105–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). The influence of processing on syntactic variation: particle placement in English. In N. Dehe, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, & S. Urban (Eds.), Verb particle explorations (pp. 269–288). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Multifactorial analysis in corpus linguistics: A study of particle placement. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax. In N. Dehe, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, & S. Urban (Eds.), Verb particle explorations (pp. 67–94). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, volume 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1990). Concept, image and symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morgan, P. S. (1997). Figuring out figure out: Metaphor and the semantics of the English verb-particle construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (4), 327–357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S. (1996). Partikelverben im Deautsch-Englischen Vergleich. In E. Lang & G. Zifonun (Eds.). Deutsch-typologisch (pp. 261–288). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J., Moon, R., et al. (1989). Collins COBUID dictionary of particle verbs. London: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar
Svenonius, P. (1996). The optionality of particle shift. Working papers in Scandinavian syntax, 571, 47–75.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, volumes II. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thim, S. (2012). Phrasal verbs: the English verb-particle construction and its history. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dongen, V. A. Sr. (1919). He puts on his hat and he puts his hat on. Neophililogus, 41, 322–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Luo, Han
2019. Particle Placement. In Particle Verbs in English, ► pp. 95 ff. DOI logo
Luo, Han
2019. Conclusion and Outlook. In Particle Verbs in English, ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Luo, Han
2019. Theoretical Framework. In Particle Verbs in English, ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Berg, Thomas
2018. Towards an explanation of the syntax of West Germanic particle verbs: A cognitive-pragmatic view. Cognitive Linguistics 29:4 ► pp. 703 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.