Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Aspects of Information Structure and Flow
Edited by Wei-lun Lu and Jirí Lukl
[Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:2] 2020
► pp. 284306
References (28)
References
Bolinger, D. L. (1952). Linear modification. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 671, 1117–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chamonikolasová, J. (2009). Word order and linear modification in English. Brno Studies in English 35(2), 17–28.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (1987). The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 641, 805–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, G. (1989). Word frequency and word order in freezes. Linguistics 271, 517–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2001). Familiarity, information flow, and linguistic form. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 431–448). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fenk-Oczlon, G. & Fenk, A. (2002). Zipf’s tool analogy and word order. Glottometrics 51, 22–28.Google Scholar
Firbas, J. (1992). Functional sentence perspective in written and spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73–113). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1980). The iconicity of grammar: isomorphism and motivation. Language 56(3), 515–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2006). Redundancy and syntactic reduction in spontaneous speech. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
(2010). Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 611, 23–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., & Raymond, W. D. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 229–254). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 11. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008). Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longacre, R. E. (1983). The grammar of discourse. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Mathesius, V. (1975). A functional analysis of present-day English on a general linguistic basis (Ed. J. Vachek). Prague: Academia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M. (1992). Is basic word order universal? In D. Payne (Ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility (pp. 15–61). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norrick, N. R. (2000). Conversational narratives: Story telling in everyday life. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, D. (1992). Nonidentifiable information and pragmatic order rules in ’O’odham. In D. Payne (Ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility (pp. 137–166). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, H. (1920). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschicte. Halle an der Saale: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. A. (1978). Modern English from a typological point of view: Some implications of the function of word order. Linguistische Berichte 541, 19–35.Google Scholar
Tomlin, R. & Rhodes, R. (1992). Information distribution in Ojibwa. In D. Payne (Ed.), Pragmatics of word order flexibility (pp. 117–135). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar