Individual differences in the decline of the Deontic nci construction
A radically usage-based exploratory investigation
This paper addresses the question of the (speaker-level) ‘cognitive how’ of (language-level) constructional attrition, defined as a systemic decrease in the occurrence of a construction in the history of a language. Presenting and analysing data from an historical idiolectal corpus on the frequency development in individual speakers’ use of a partially schematic construction instantiated by such types as be obliged to and be permitted to, it offers a first attempt to measure whether a general decline in the frequency of this construction can also be observed to be an internal development during a speaker’s lifespan. The results confirm this to be the case in a sizeable group of speakers and the paper provides an initial insight into how this may contribute to a genuinely cognitive account of the speaker-external development.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background and problem
- 3.Methodology
- 4.Results
- 4.1Frequency averages and ranges
- 4.2Frequency development
- 4.2.1Authors using the Deontic nci construction less in later life
- 4.2.2Authors using the Deontic nci construction more in later life
- 4.2.3Authors using the Deontic nci construction as much in late as in early career
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (33)
References
Anthonissen, L. (2020). Cognition in construction grammar: Connecting individual and community grammars. Cognitive Linguistics,
31
(2), 309–337. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bergs, A. (2005). Social networks and historical sociolinguistics: Studies in morphosyntactic variation in the Paston Letters (1421–1503). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dąbrowska, E. (2016). Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins. Cognitive Linguistics,
27
(4), 479–491. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Smet, H. (2016). How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change,
28
(1). 83–102. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Smet, H. (2020). What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics,
31
(2), 251–278. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Disney, S. (2016). Another visit to
be supposed to from a diachronic constructionist perspective. English studies,
97
(8), 892–916. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevalainen, T., Raumolin-Brunberg, H., & Mannila, H. (2011). The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time depth of change. Language Variation and Change,
23
(1), 1–43. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noël, D. (2008). The nominative and infinitive in Late Modern English: A diachronic constructionist approach. Journal of English Linguistics,
36
(4), 314–340. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noël, D. (2017). The development of non-deontic be bound to in a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar perspective. Lingua,
199
1, 72–93. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noël, D., & Colleman, T. (2021). Diachronic construction grammar. In Xu Wen & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 662–675). London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petré, P. (2010). The functions of weorðan and its loss in the past tense in Old and Middle English. English Language and Linguistics,
14
(3), 457–484. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petré, P. & Van de Velde, F. (2018). The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language,
94
(4), 867–901. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rudnicka, K. (2019). The statistics of obsolescence: Purpose subordinators in Late Modern English. Strasbourg/Basel/Freiburg: EUCOR – The European Campus/Universität Basel/Uni Freiburg.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sankoff, G. (2005). Cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in sociolinguistics. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, K. J. Mattheier & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society, vol. 21. (pp. 1002–1013). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, H. (2015). A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association,
3
(1), 3–26. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, H. (2020). The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, H., & Mantlik, A. (2015). Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia,
133
(4), 583–623. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tagliamonti, S. A., & D’Arcy, A. (2007). Frequency and variation in the community grammar: Tracking a new change through the generations. Language Variation and Change
19
1, 199–217. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, E. C., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trousdale, G. (2008). Words and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the English impersonal construction. In S. M. Fitzmaurice & D. Minkova (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV: Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change (pp. 301–326). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verhagen, V. (2019). Illuminating variation: Individual differences in entrenchment of multi-word units. Amsterdam: LOT (Landelijke Onderzoeksschool Taalwetenschap/ Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wagner, S. E., & Sankoff, G. (2011). Age grading in the Montréal French inflected future. Language Variation and Change,
23
(3), 275–313. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.