Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 3:2 (2016) ► pp.177206
References (43)
Anthony, L. (2014). AntConc (v3.4.3w) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Baayen, R.H. (2001). Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bai, Y. (2014). A usage-based study of the just me construction. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 21, 127–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bick, E. (1996). VISL: Visual interactive syntax learning [Online]. Retrieved from [URL]. Accessed July 23, 2015.
Borgatti, S. (1997). Multidimensional scaling [Online]. Retrieved from [URL]. Accessed July 30, 2015.
Bybee, J. (1985). Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.A. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2005). Logical and typological arguments for radical construction grammar. In J.-O. Östman (Ed.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 273–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 395–420). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.A., & Cruse, D.A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.A., & Wood, E.J. (2000). Construal operations in linguistics and artificial intelligence. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Meaning and cognition: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 51–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J. (1982). Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981 (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 641, 501–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, M. (1967). Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 177–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1983). Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12(2), 153–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K, McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Harder, P. (2010). Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2015, February). Substance(s) and the rise and imposition of structure(s). Paper presented at the Substance and Structure in Linguistics workshop , University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hilpert, M. (2014). Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, K.E. (2014). The semantics-pragmatics interplay in a partonomic construction: Construals, lexical relations, pragmatic points and ‘the construction itself’. Rask, 411, 3–38.Google Scholar
Koizumi, R. (2012). Relationships between text length and lexical diversity measures: Can we use short texts of less than 100 tokens? Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 1(1), 60–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar–Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. (2001). Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levshina, N. (2014). Geographic variation of quite ADJ in twenty national varieties of English: A pilot study. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 21, 109–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McArthur, T. (1992). Variety. In T. McArthur (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the English language (pp. 1081–1082). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, P.M. (2011). Gramulator (v6.0) [Computer Software]. Memphis, TN: The University of Memphis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P.M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 421, 381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patten, A.L. (2014). The historical development of the it-cleft: A comparison of two different approaches. In N. Gisborne & W.B. Hollmann (Eds.), Theory and data in cognitive linguistics (pp. 87–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, J. (2005). The Spanish impersonal se-construction: Constructional variation and change. Constructions, 11, 1–49.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1989). Language varieties and standard language. JALT Journal 111, 1,14–25.Google Scholar
Ramm, W. (2000). Textual variation in travel guides. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Discourse and community: Doing functional linguistics (pp. 147–168). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.A. (2012). A gay paper: Why should sociolinguistics bother with semantics? English Today, 28(4), 38–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schönefeld, D. (2013). It is... quite common for theoretical predictions to go untested (BNC_CMH). A register-specific analysis of the English go un-V-en construction. Journal of Pragmatics, 521, 17–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibuya, Y. (2015, July). Lexical and constructional richness of adjectives: A diachronic study. Paper presented at 13th International Conference on Cognitive Linguistics , Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Siewierska, A., & Hollmann, W.B. (2007). Ditransitive clauses in English with special reference to Lancashire dialect. In M. Hannay & G.J. Steen (Eds.), Structural-functional studies in English grammar: In honour of Lachlan Mackenzie (pp. 83–102). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torre, E. (2015). Language as an emergent construction network: A close-up on Italian idioms. Ecological Psychology, 27(3), 202–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Gijsel, S., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D. (2005). A variationist, corpus linguistic analysis of lexical richness. Proceedings from the Corpus Linguistics Conference Series, 1(1), 1–16.Google Scholar