Article published In:
Cognitive Linguistic Studies
Vol. 3:2 (2016) ► pp.177206
Anthony, L
(2014) AntConc (v3.4.3w) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Baayen, R.H
(2001) Word frequency distributions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bai, Y
(2014) A usage-based study of the just me construction. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 21, 127–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S
(2009) Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bick, E
(1996) VISL: Visual interactive syntax learning [Online]. Retrieved from [URL]. Accessed July 23, 2015.
Borgatti, S
(1997) Multidimensional scaling [Online]. Retrieved from [URL]. Accessed July 30, 2015.
Bybee, J
Croft, W.A
(2001) Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2005) Logical and typological arguments for radical construction grammar. In J.-O. Östman (Ed.), Construction grammars: Cognitive grounding and theoretical extensions (pp. 273–314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009) Toward a social cognitive linguistics. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics (pp. 395–420). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.A., & Cruse, D.A
(2004) Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.A., & Wood, E.J
(2000) Construal operations in linguistics and artificial intelligence. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Meaning and cognition: A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 51–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, C.J
(1982) Frame semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Eds.), Linguistics in the morning calm: Selected papers from SICOL-1981 (pp. 111–137). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C.J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone . Language, 641, 501–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A.E
(1995) Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2006) Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gregory, M
(1967) Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics, 3(2), 177–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C
(1983) Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12(2), 153–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K, McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P
(1964) The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Harder, P
(2010) Meaning in mind and society: A functional contribution to the social turn in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015, February). Substance(s) and the rise and imposition of structure(s). Paper presented at the Substance and Structure in Linguistics workshop , University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hilpert, M
(2014) Construction grammar and its application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D
(1972) On communicative competence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, K.E
(2014) The semantics-pragmatics interplay in a partonomic construction: Construals, lexical relations, pragmatic points and ‘the construction itself’. Rask, 411, 3–38.Google Scholar
Koizumi, R
(2012) Relationships between text length and lexical diversity measures: Can we use short texts of less than 100 tokens? Vocabulary Learning and Instruction, 1(1), 60–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G
(1987) Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R.W
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar–Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001) Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 12(2), 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levshina, N
(2014) Geographic variation of quite ADJ in twenty national varieties of English: A pilot study. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 21, 109–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McArthur, T
(1992) Variety. In T. McArthur (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the English language (pp. 1081–1082). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCarthy, P.M
(2011) Gramulator (v6.0) [Computer Software]. Memphis, TN: The University of Memphis. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P.M., & Jarvis, S
(2010) MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 421, 381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patten, A.L
(2014) The historical development of the it-cleft: A comparison of two different approaches. In N. Gisborne & W.B. Hollmann (Eds.), Theory and data in cognitive linguistics (pp. 87–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, J
(2005) The Spanish impersonal se-construction: Constructional variation and change. Constructions, 11, 1–49.Google Scholar
Quirk, R
(1989) Language varieties and standard language. JALT Journal 111, 1,14–25.Google Scholar
Ramm, W
(2000) Textual variation in travel guides. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Discourse and community: Doing functional linguistics (pp. 147–168). Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Robinson, J.A
(2012) A gay paper: Why should sociolinguistics bother with semantics? English Today, 28(4), 38–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schönefeld, D
(2013) It is... quite common for theoretical predictions to go untested (BNC_CMH). A register-specific analysis of the English go un-V-en construction. Journal of Pragmatics, 521, 17–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibuya, Y
(2015, July). Lexical and constructional richness of adjectives: A diachronic study. Paper presented at 13th International Conference on Cognitive Linguistics , Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Siewierska, A., & Hollmann, W.B
(2007) Ditransitive clauses in English with special reference to Lancashire dialect. In M. Hannay & G.J. Steen (Eds.), Structural-functional studies in English grammar: In honour of Lachlan Mackenzie (pp. 83–102). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torre, E
(2015) Language as an emergent construction network: A close-up on Italian idioms. Ecological Psychology, 27(3), 202–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Gijsel, S., Speelman, D., & Geeraerts, D
(2005) A variationist, corpus linguistic analysis of lexical richness. Proceedings from the Corpus Linguistics Conference Series, 1(1), 1–16.Google Scholar