Part of
Advances in Contact Linguistics: In honour of Pieter Muysken
Edited by Norval Smith, Tonjes Veenstra and Enoch O. Aboh
[Contact Language Library 57] 2020
► pp. 3760
Aboh, E. O.
2006The role of the syntax-semantics interface in language transfer. In L2 Acquisition and Creole Genesis: Dialogues [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 42], C. Lefebvre, L. White & C. Jourdan (eds), 221–252. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015aThe Emergence of Hybrid Grammars: Contact, Change and Creation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015bThe left periphery in the Surinamese creoles and Gbe: On the modularity of substrate transfer. In Surviving the Middle Passage, P. C. Muysken & N. S. H. Smith (eds), 323–368. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Aboh, E., Ameka, F. & Essegbey, J.
2002Moving from verbs to prepositions. Paper presented at the International Conference on Adpositions, Leuven, January 2002.
Ameka, F.
2003Prepositions and postpositions in Ewe(Gbe): Empirical and theoretical considerations. In Typologie des langues d’afrique et universaux de la grammaire, Vol. 2: Benue-kwa, Wolof, P. Sauzet & A. Zribi-Hertz (eds), 41–67. Paris: l’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Ameka, F. & Essegbey, J.
2013Serialising languages: Satellite-framed, verb-framed or neither. Ghana Journal of Linguistics 2: 19–38.Google Scholar
Arends, J.
1995Demographic factors in the formation of Sranan. In The Early Stages of Creolization [Creole Language Library 13], J. Arends (ed.), 233–285. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borges, R.
2013The Life of Language: Dynamics of Language Contact in Suriname. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Bruyn, A.
1995Grammaticalization in Creoles: The Development of Determiners and Relative Clauses in Sranan. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar
1996On identifying instances of grammaticalization in creole languages. In Changing Meanings, Changing Functions: Papers Related to Grammaticalization in Contact Languages, P. Baker & A. Syea (eds), 29–46. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
2003Grammaticalisation, réanalyse et influence substratique: Quelques cas de Sranan. In Grammaticalisation et réanalyse: Approches de la variation créole et française, S. Kriegel (ed.), 25–47. Paris: CNRS Éditions.Google Scholar
2009Grammaticalization in creoles: Ordinary and not-so-ordinary cases. Studies in Language 33: 312–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Drie, A.
1985Sye! Arki tori!, compiled by Trudi Guda. [Paramaribo:] Afdeling Cultuur Studies van het Ministerie van Onderwijs, Wetenschappen en Cultuur.Google Scholar
de Kleine, C. M.
1999A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Surinamese Dutch as Spoken by the Creole Population of Paramaribo, Suriname. Ann Arbor MI: University Microfilms International.Google Scholar
Donicie, A.
1954De creolentaal van Suriname. Spraakkunst. Paramaribo: Radhakishun.Google Scholar
Essegbey, J.
2001Motion expression in Sranan, evidence for substrate influence? Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, Coimbra.
2005The “basic locative construction” in Gbe languages and Surinamese creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 20: 229–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Focke, H. C.
1855Neger-Engelsch woordenboek. Leiden: P.H. van den Heuvell.Google Scholar
Gobardhan-Rambocus, L.
1995Het Sranan: Ontwikkeling en emancipatie. In De erfenis van de slavernij, L. Gobardhan-Rambocus, M. S. Hasankhan & J. L. Egger (eds), 147–71. Paramaribo: Anton de Kom Universiteit.Google Scholar
Huttar, G. L.
1975Sources of creole semantic structures. Language 51: 684–695. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981Some Kwa-like features of Djuka syntax. Studies in African Linguistics 12: 291–323.Google Scholar
Lambert-Brétière, R.
2009Serializing languages as satellite-framed: the case of Fon. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, C.
1998Creole Genesis and the Acquisition of Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, C. & Brousseau, A.-M.
2002A Grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, J. S.
1999The role of relexification in creole genesis. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 14: 225–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Y. & Sakel, J.
Mayer, M.
1969Frog, Where Are You? New York NY: Dial Press.Google Scholar
2000The origin of the syntax and semantics of property items in the Surinamese Plantation Creole. In Language Change and Language Contact in Pidgins and Creoles [Creole Language Library, 21] J. McWhorter (ed), 201–234. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, I.
1998The syntax of some locative expressions in Sranan. Prepositions, postpositions or noun? Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 13: 335–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, R. P. & Gaines, R.
1997Toward a typology of directional motion for African languages. Studies in African Linguistics 26: 193–220.Google Scholar
Schumann, C. L.
1781Die Geschichte unsers Herrn und Heilandes Jesu Christi, aus den vier Evangelisten zusammengezogen, durch Samuel Lieberkühn; in Neger-Englische Sprache übersezt, zum Gebrauch bey der Neger-Gemeine. MS Paramaribo [Moravian Archives Utrecht 12/617].Google Scholar
1783Neger-Englisches Wörter-Buch. Editio tertia. MS Paramaribo [Moravian Archives Paramaribo 12/648].Google Scholar
Sebba, M.
1987The Syntax of Serial Verbs. An Investigation into Serialisation in Sranan and Other Languages [Creole Language Library 2]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I.
1997Mind, code, and text. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón, J. L. Bybee, J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson (eds), 437–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism. In Evidence for Linguistic Relativity [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 198], S. Niemeier & R. Dirven (eds), 107–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and Contextual Perpectives, S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (eds), 219–257. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse and cognition. In Space in Language: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories [Typological Studies in Language 66], M. Hickmann & S. Robert (eds), 60–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. & Hoiting, N.
1994Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. In Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, General Session, K. E. Moore, D. A. Peterson & C. Wentum (eds), 437–505. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Smith, N. S. H.
1987The Genesis of the Creole Languages of Surinam. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
1997Ingredient X: The common core of African words in the Atlantic creoles. Paper presented at the meeting of Society for Pidgin and Creole Linguistics, London.
2001Voodoo Chile: Differential substrate effects in Saramaccan and Haitian. In Creolization and Contact [Creole Language Library 23], N. Smith & T. Veenstra (eds), 43–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sordam, M. & Eersel, H.
1989Surinaams woordenboek/Sranantongo, 2nd edn. Baarn: Bosch & Keuning.Google Scholar
Talmy, L.
1985Lexicalization patterns. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007Lexical typologies. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, 2nd edn, T. Shopen (ed), 66–168. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Main verb properties and equipollent framing. In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language. Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura & Ş. Özçalişkan (eds), 389–402. New York NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Thomason, S. G.
2001Language Contact. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
van Dyk, P.
[ca 1765] Nieuwe en nooit bevoorens geziene onderwyzinge in het Bastert Engels, of Neeger Engels, zoo als het zelve in de Hollandsze Colonien gebruikt word. Amsterdam: Erven de Weduwe Jacobus van Egmont.Google Scholar
van Putten, S.
2017Motion in serializing languages revisited: The case of Avatime. STUF 70: 65–83.Google Scholar
Wilner, J.
(ed.) 1994Wortubuku fu Sranan Tongo, 3rd trial ed. Paramaribo: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Yakpo, K. & Bruyn, A.
2015Trans-Atlantic patterns: The relexification of locative constructions in Sranan. In Surviving the Middle Passage: The West Africa-Surinam Sprachbund, P. C. Muysken & N. S. H. Smith (eds), 135–174. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yakpo, K., van den Berg, M. C. & Borges, R.
2015On the linguistic consequences of language contact in Suriname: The case of convergence. In In and out of Suriname, E. B. Carlin, I. Leglise, B. Migge & P. B. Tjon Sie Fat (eds), 164–195. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J. & Yangklang, P.
2004A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion event typology. In Relating Events in Narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and Contextual Perpectives, S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (eds), 159–190. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar