Cover not available
Part of
Variation Rolls the Dice: A worldwide collage in honour of Salikoko S. Mufwene
Edited by Enoch O. Aboh and Cécile B. Vigouroux
[Contact Language Library 59] 2021
► pp. 289–305

Learnability and ecological factors as motivators of language change

| URPP Language and Space, University of Zurich
This chapter adopts Mufwene’s (2001) framework according to which language acquisition is a process whereby competition and selection of linguistic features from the inputs create a unique idiolect. It examines the principles of selection of a given feature over others, and the mechanisms by which a feature spreads across a community (i.e., from one idiolect to another). These questions are addressed at the individual and population levels by analysing data from a twitter corpus. The frequency of a feature in the input as well as a suggested learnability factor are relevant to this discussion. Learnability is defined as the combination of the specific linguistic properties of a linguistic feature, and the universal human capacity to learn those specific properties.
Keywords: learnability, competition, selection, language-change, acquisition
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.Dutch gender acquisition
  • 4.Selection
  • 5.Feature spread
    • 5.1Twitter
      • 5.1.1Methodology
      • 5.1.2Results
  • 6.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 12 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/coll.59.12efr
References (44)
References
Aboh, E. O. 2015. The Emergence of Hybrid Grammars: Language Contact and Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. Information structure: A cartographic perspective. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, C. Féry & S. Ishihara (eds), 147–164. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, U. 2009. Contact Languages: Ecology and Evolution in Asia. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bailey, C. N. 1982. The garden path that historical linguistics went astray on. Language & Communication 2: 151-160.‏ DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blom, E., Polisenská, D. & Weerman, F. 2008. Articles, adjectives, and age of onset: The acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender. Second Language Research 24: 297–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bol, G. W. & Kuiken, F. 1988. Grammaticale Analyse van Taalontwikkelingsstoornissen (Grammatical Analysis of Language Development Disorders). PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cornips, L. & Hulk, A. 2007. Diminutives and gender awareness in bilingual acquisition. Talk presented at the 6th International Symposium on Bilingualism, University of Hamburg, June.
Cornips, L., Van der Hoek, M. & Verwer, R. 2006. The acquisition of grammatical gender in bilingual child acquisition of Dutch (by older Moroccan and Turkish children). In Linguistics in the Netherlands, B. Los & J. van de Weijer (eds), 40–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. 2005. Morphology and word order in “creolization” and beyond. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, G. Cinque & R. S. Kayne (eds), 293–372. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. 1990. The Acquisition of Two Languages from Birth: A Case Study. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, A. & Gillis, S. 1998. The Acquisition of Dutch [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 52]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Rooij, V. 2005. De studie van Etnolecten: Overdenkingen vanuit een etnografisch perspectief [The study of ethnolects: Reflections from an ethnographic perspective]. Talk presented at the Workshop Etnisch Nederlands, Utrecht University, November.
Donaldson, B. C. 1987. Dutch Reference Grammar. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Dorleijn, M. 2016. Can internet data help to uncover developing preferred multilingual usage patterns? An exploration of data from Turkish-Dutch bilingual internet fora. Journal of Language Contact 9: 130–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentry, J. 2015. twitteR: R based Twitter client. R package version 1.1.9. [URL] (16 December 2020).
Hulk, A. 2007. Deviance in early child bilingualism. In Romance Linguistics 2006: Selected Papers from the 36th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 287], J. Camacho, N. Flores-Ferrán, L. Sánchez, V. Déprez & M. J. Cabrera (eds), 177–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hulk, A. & Cornips, L. 2006a. Neuter gender and interface vulnerability in child L2/2L1 Dutch. In Paths of Development in L1 and L2 Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 39], S. Unsworth, T. Parodi, A. Sorace & M. Young-Scholten (eds), 107–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006b. Between 2L1- and child L2 acquisition: An experimental study of bilingual Dutch. In Interfaces in Multilingualism: Acquisition and Representation [Hamburg Studies on Multilingualism 4], C. Lleo (ed.), 115–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubowicz, C. 2002. Functional categories in (ab)normal language acquisition. In The Process of Language Acquisition, I. Lasser (ed.), 165-202. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lang, D. T. 2014. RJSONIO: Serialize R objects to JSON, JavaScript. [URL]> (16 December 2020).
Le Page, R. B. & Tabouret-Keller, A. 1985. Acts of Identity: Creole-Based Approaches to Language and Identity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002. Competition and selection in language evolution. Selection 3: 45–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008. Language Evolution: Contact, Competition and Change. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. 1984. Attitudes and experiences of discrimination: The Netherlandic of Moroccan foreign workers. In Sociolinguistics in the Low Countries [Studies in the Sciences of Language Series 5], K. Deprez (ed.), 333–356. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nortier, J. & Dorleijn, M. 2008. A Moroccan accent in Dutch: A sociocultural style restricted to the Moroccan community? International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 125-142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ooms, J., James, D., DebRoy, S., Wickham, H. & Horner, J. 2016. RMySQL: Database interface and “MySQL” driver for R. <[URL]> (16 December 2020).
Oracle. 2016. MySQL Server 5.7. <[URL]> (16 December 2020).
R Core Team. 2016. R. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <[URL]> (16 December 2020).Google Scholar
Snow, C., Van Eeden, R. & Muysken, P. 1981. The interactional origins of foreigner talk: Municipal employees and foreign workers. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 28: 81-92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snyder, K. 2017. Exploring the Development of Stylistic Practices with a Sociolinguistic Twitter Corpus. Master’s dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. 2001a. A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/ procedural model. Nature Reviews (Neuroscience) 2: 717–726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001b. The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 4: 105–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S. & Hulk, A. 2010. L1 acquisition of neuter gender in Dutch: Production and judgement. In Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2009, J. Costa, A. Castro, M. Lobo & F. Pratas (eds), 483-492. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
van Berkum, J. 1996. The Psycholinguistics of Grammatical Gender: Studies in Language Comprehension and Production. Nijmegen: Nijmegen University Press.Google Scholar
van den Berg, M. 2007. A Grammar of Early Sranan. Zetten: Drukkerij Manta.Google Scholar
Van der Velde, M. 2003. Déterminants et Pronoms en Néerlandais et en Français: Syntaxe et Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Université Paris 8.Google Scholar
2004. L’acquisition des déterminants en L1: Une étude comparative entre le français et le néerlandais. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère 21: 9-46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kampen, J. & Wijnen, F. 2000. Grammaticale ontwikkeling (Grammatical development). In Kindertaalverwerving: Een Handboek voor het Nederlands (Child Language Acquisition: A Handbook for Dutch), S. Gillis & A. M. Schaerlaekens (eds), 225–285. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. I. 1968. Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wickham, H. 2015. stringr: Simple, consistent wrappers for common string operations. <[URL]> (16 December 2020).
Wijnen, F. & M. Verrips. 1998. The acquisition of Dutch syntax. In The Acquisition of Dutch [Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 52], S. Gillis & A. De Houwer (eds), 223-300.‏ Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. 2016. The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break Rules of Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar