Cover not available
Article published In:
Concentric
Vol. 46:1 (2020) ► pp.66–94

Are donkey sentences and bare conditionals family or friends?

Evidence from L1 Chinese

| National Taiwan Normal University
| National Taiwan Normal University
| National Taiwan Normal University

The present study investigates children’s first language acquisition of donkey sentences and bare conditionals in Mandarin Chinese, both of which are concerned with quantification. Kindergarteners, Grade 2 and Grade 4 were recruited for experimental groups, each group consisting of 18 subjects, and 18 adults comprised a control group against which to compare their interpretations. Each subject finished two Truth-Value Judgment tasks, which were sentences in isolation and sentences in context. The results of this research identified a developmental pattern regarding the acquisition of donkey sentences and bare conditionals in Mandarin Chinese. It was found that overall children under seven years of age had difficulty interpreting quantificational sentences. First, concerning the relatedness of the two constructions, all four groups showed a tendency to find donkey sentences easier to interpret than bare conditionals. With respect to contextual effects, by Grade 2, children could obtain adult-like interpretations of donkey sentences in a biasing context, but it was not until they were in Grade 4 that they could interpret both donkey sentences and bare conditionals in their supporting context with adult-like readings. As a result, the subjects’ interpretations were greatly affected by context, but the two constructions were affected in different ways.

Keywords: donkey sentences, bare conditionals, first language acquisition, quantification, Mandarin Chinese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1 Geurts (2002)
    • 2.2 Foppolo (2009)
    • 2.3 Grosz et al. (2014)
    • 2.4Summary
  • 3.Research design
    • 3.1Subjects
    • 3.2Materials and method
      • 3.2.1Donkey sentences
      • 3.2.2Bare conditionals
    • 3.3Procedure
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Relatedness of the two constructions
    • 4.2Contextual effect
    • 4.3Age effect
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/consl.00013.che
References
Champollion, Lucas
2016 Homogeneity in donkey sentences. Proceedings of the 26th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, SALT, ed. by Mary Moroney, Carol-Rose Little, Jacob Collard and Dan Burgdorf, 684–704. Austin, TX: University of Texas. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen, and C.-T. James Huang
1996 Two types of donkey sentences. Natural Language Semantics 41:121–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheung, Candice Chi Hang
2007 The syntax and semantics of bare conditionals in Chinese. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 111, ed. by Estela Puig-Waldmüller, 150–164. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1986 Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ariel
2001 Relative readings of many, often, and generics. Natural Language Semantics 9.1:41–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cook, Vivian James
1988 Chomsky’s Universal Grammar: An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen, Rosalind Thornton, Carole Boster, Laura Conway, Diane Lillo-Martin, and Elaine Woodams
2009 Quantification without quantification. Language Acquisition 5.2:83–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dekker, Paul
2001 On if and only. Proceedings of the 11th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, SALT, ed. by Rachel Hastings, Brendan Jackson and Zsofia Zvolenszky, 114–133. New York: New York University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeVault, David, and Matthew Stone
2004 Interpreting vague utterances in context. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, COLING, ed. by Lothar Lemnitzer, Detmar Meurers and Erhard Hinrichs, 1247–1253. Geneva, Switzerland: University of Geneva. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foppolo, Francesca
2009 The puzzle of donkey anaphora resolution. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, ed. by Martin Walkow and Muhammad Abdurrahman, 297–310. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Gelman, Susan A., and Henry M. Wellman
1991 Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition 38.3:213–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geurts, Bart
2002 Donkey business. Linguistics and Philosophy 25.2:129–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Quantifying kids. Language Acquisition 111:197–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, Alison
1988 Conceptual and semantic development as theory change: The case of object permanence. Mind & Language 3.3:197–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gopnik, Alison, and Andrew N. Meltzoff
1997 Words, Thoughts, and Theories. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick G., Pritty Patel-Grosz, Evelina Fedorenko, and Edward Gibson
2014 Constraints on donkey pronouns. Journal of Semantics 32.4:619–648. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997 Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Herburger, Elena
1997 Focus and weak noun phrases. Natural Language Semantics 5.1:53–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Conditional perfection: The truth and the whole truth. Proceedings of the 25th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, SALT, ed. by Sarah D’Antonio, Mary Moroney and Carol Rose Little, 615–635. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James
1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15.4:531–574.Google Scholar
Inhelder, Bärbel, and Jean Piaget
1958 The Growth of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence: An Essay on the Construction of Formal Operational Structures. New York: Basic Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ireri, Anthony M., Daniel M. Mukuni, Philomena N. Mathuvi, Amos M. Njagi, and Njagi I. Karugu
2012 An overview of major biological and contextual factors in language acquisition. American Journal of Linguistics 1.3:33–39.Google Scholar
Kanazawa, Makoto
1994 Weak vs. strong readings of donkey sentences and monotonicity inferences in a dynamic setting. Linguistics and Philosophy 17.2:109–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keil, Frank C.
1989 Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1996 Pragmatic strengthening in plural predications and donkey sentences. Proceedings of the 6th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, SALT, ed. by Teresa Galloway and Justin Spence, 136–153. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, Keng-yu, and Shiao-hui Chan
2019 When senses meet functions: An amodal stage in conceptual processing. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 31.1:64–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ni, Weijia
1987 Empty topics in Chinese. UConn Working Papers in Linguistics 11. Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Pan, Haihua, and Yan Jiang
1997 NP interpretation and donkey sentences in Chinese. Paper presented at the Workshop on Interface Strategies in Chinese, Cornell University, Ithaca.
Pearson, Barbara Zurer, and Peter de Villiers
2005 Child language acquisition: Discourse, narrative, and pragmatics. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd edition), ed. by Keith Brown. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean
1936 Origins of Intelligence in the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Prévost, Philippe, and Johanne Paradis
(eds.) 2004 The Acquisition of French in Different Contexts: Focus on Functional Categories. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1982 Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Thuan, Tran, and Benjamin Bruening
2013 Wh-phrases as indefinites: A Vietnamese perspective. Linguistics of Vietnamese: An International Survey, ed. by Daniel Hole and Elisabeth Löbel, 217–241. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Xin
2007 Guanyu luziju de jidian yiwen yu sikao [Some questions and reflections about donkey sentences]. Yuwen Xuekan 21:69–72.Google Scholar
Yatsushiro, Kazuko
2008 Quantifier acquisition: Presuppositions of “every”. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 121, ed. by Atle Grønn, 663–677. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar