Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse
Editor
Netlibrary e-Book – Not for resale
ISBN 9781423766384
The activity of parliaments is largely linguistic activity: they produce talk and they produce texts. Broadly speaking, the objectives that this discourse aims to satisfy are similar all over the world: to legitimate or contest legislation, to represent diverse interests, to scrutinise the activity of government, to influence opinion and to recruit and promote political actors. But the discourse of different national parliaments is subject to variation, at all linguistic levels, on the basis of history, cultural specificity, and political culture in particular. Through the use of various analytical tools of functional linguistics, this volume seeks to provide explanatory analyses of parliamentary discourse in different countries – Britain, Germany, Italy, Mexico, Spain, Sweden and the United States – and to explore its peculiarities. Each chapter outlines a particular methodological framework and its application to instances of parliamentary discourse on important issues such as war, European integration, impeachment and immigration.
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 10] 2004. vi, 384 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Table of Contents
-
Introduction: The whys and wherefores of analysing parliamentary discoursePaul Bayley | pp. 1–44
-
Insulting as (un)parliamentary practice in the British and Swedish parliaments: A rhetorical approachCornelia Ilie | pp. 45–86
-
Negotiating conflict: Interruptions in British and Italian parliamentary debatesCinzia Bevitori | pp. 87–109
-
Consent and dissent in British and Italian parliamentary debates on the 1998 Gulf CrisisNicoletta Vasta | pp. 111–149
-
Legitimising and informative discourse in the Kosovo debates in the British House of Commons and the Italian Chamber of DeputiesDenise Dibattista | pp. 151–184
-
Threat and fear in parliamentary debates in Britain, Germany and ItalyPaul Bayley, Cinzia Bevitori and Elisabetta Zoni | pp. 185–236
-
Ways of talking about work in parliamentary discourse in Britain and SpainPaul Bayley and Félix San Vicente | pp. 237–269
-
'Truth, Justice and the American way': The APPRAISAL SYSTEM of JUDGEMENT in the U.S. House debate on the impeachment of the President, 1998Donna R. Miller | pp. 271–300
-
Parliamentary discourse when things go wrong: Mapping histories, contexts, conflictsTeresa Carbó | pp. 301–337
-
Text and Context of parliamentary debatesTeun A. van Dijk | pp. 339–372
Cited by
Cited by 62 other publications
Alexandre-Collier, Agnès
2022. Brexit and Anti-Parliament Discourses among Conservative MPs (2016–2019). Parliamentary Affairs 75:2 ► pp. 239 ff. 
Almutairi, Bandar Alhumaidi A.
2022. Diachronic changes of least delicate appraisal in parliamentary and congressional language. Functions of Language 29:2 ► pp. 169 ff.
Baker, Olja
2021. Parliamentary directives in New Zealand and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Languages in Contrast 21:1 ► pp. 28 ff.
Berrocal, Martina & Aleksandra Salamurović
2019. Chapter 1. Introduction. In Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 84], ► pp. 1 ff.
Bischof, Karin & Cornelia Ilie
2018. Democracy and discriminatory strategies in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 17:5 ► pp. 585 ff.
Borges, Robert & Margot van den Berg
2023. Chapter 10. Language variation in parliamentary speech in Suriname. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111], ► pp. 277 ff.
Boswell, Owuor, Ngugi Beth & Kanyi Charles
2023. A Deconstruction of Strategic Linguistic Elements Used to Invoke Gender and Power During Debate in Busia County Assembly, Kenya. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences 1:6 ► pp. 30 ff.
Brzozowska, Dorota & Władysław Chłopicki
2021. Interventions of Speakers of Polish and British Parliaments in the light of politeness theory. Intercultural Pragmatics 18:1 ► pp. 83 ff.
Burroughs, Elaine
2015. The Discourse of Controlling “Illegal Immigration” in Irish Parliamentary Texts. Journal of Language and Politics 14:4 ► pp. 479 ff.
Calzada Pérez, Maria
Calzada Pérez, María
2018. What is kept and what is lost without translation? A corpus-assisted discourse study of the European Parliament’s original and translated English. Perspectives 26:2 ► pp. 277 ff.
Calzada-Pérez, María
2017. Researching the European Parliament with Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 465 ff.
Chibois, Jonathan
2023. What Do We Call an ‘MP’? On Categories of Thought in the Anthropology of Parliaments. Parliamentary Affairs
Cuenca, Maria-Josep
2014. The use of demonstratives and context activation in Catalan parliamentary debate. Discourse Studies 16:6 ► pp. 729 ff.
Domeradzka, Magdalena
2018. “It's Not the Whole Truth”. The Notions of Truth and Falsehood as Persuasive Devices in Polish and Swedish Parliamentary Talk. Folia Scandinavica Posnaniensia 25:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Fenton-Smith, Ben
2008. Discourse structure and political performance in adversarial parliamentary questioning. Journal of Language and Politics 7:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Fernández Rosique, Marina
2023. Parlamento Europeo y el lenguaje no sexista: un análisis desde la perspectiva de la lingüística de corpus. TRANS: Revista de Traductología :27 ► pp. 31 ff.
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
2016. Chapter 2. Intensification, identity and gender in the Andalusian Parliament. In A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 68], ► pp. 35 ff.
Fuentes-Rodríguez, Catalina
2022. Argumentative Strategies and Self-image Projection in Spanish Political Interviews. In Adversarial Political Interviewing, ► pp. 171 ff.
Fuentes-Rodríguez, Catalina
2023. Adversarial Attacks in Spanish Politics: Direct and Indirect Forms. In Political Debasement, ► pp. 31 ff.
Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia
2014. ‘TALKING PEACE – GOING TO WAR’. Critical Discourse Studies 11:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Gibbins, Justin
2022. Little Englanders or Big Britainers? The UK and EU role conceptions during the Brexit bill debate. Politics & Policy 50:2 ► pp. 298 ff.
Gruber, Helmut
Ilie, Cornelia
2015. Parliamentary Discourse. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, ► pp. 1 ff.
Ilie, Cornelia
2021. Discussion, dispute or controversy?. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 9:2 ► pp. 237 ff.
Inya, Onwu
2021. ‘The legislature is the engine room of democracy’: Constructing ideological worldviews through proximisation strategies in Nigerian Senate debates. Discourse & Society 32:2 ► pp. 196 ff.
Inya, Onwu
2023. ‘I Cannot Overreach the Senate’: Orienting to the Macro-Context of Legislative Debates of the Nigerian Senate. Journal of Asian and African Studies ► pp. 002190962311680 ff.
Jakaza, Ernest
2013. Gricean implicature and election predictions: A case of the Zimbabwean 2008 election campaign. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 31:3 ► pp. 311 ff.
Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M.
Keremidchieva, Zornitsa
2014. The U.S.Congressional Recordas a technology of representation. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:1 ► pp. 57 ff.
Kitaeva, Elena & Olga Ozerova
2019. Intertextuality in Political Discourse. In Language, Power, and Ideology in Political Writing [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 143 ff.
Klepański, Jakub, Maciej Hartliński & Arkadiusz Żukowski
2023. The European migrant crisis in Polish parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 22:4 ► pp. 485 ff.
KNOX, DEAN & CHRISTOPHER LUCAS
2021. A Dynamic Model of Speech for the Social Sciences. American Political Science Review 115:2 ► pp. 649 ff.
Kuznyetsova, Ganna
2021. Political discourse from the standpoint of the addressee. Cognition, Communication, Discourse :23 ► pp. 118 ff.
Lastres-López, Cristina
2023. Chapter 11. Morphosyntactic and pragmatic variation in conditional constructions in English and Spanish parliamentary discourse. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111], ► pp. 308 ff.
Lesch, Harold & Karen Grové
2018. Interpreting services in the Western Cape Legislature. Translation and Interpreting Studies 13:2 ► pp. 250 ff.
Miller, Donna R. & Monica Turci
2008. Construing the ‘social gospel’ of Martin Luther King Jr.. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 2:3 ► pp. 399 ff.
Mollin, Sandra
2007. The Hansard hazard: gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora 2:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Müftüler-Baç, Meltem & Rahime Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm
Müller, Marcus & Ruth M. Mell
2022. ‘Risk’ in political discourse. A corpus approach to semantic change in German Bundestag debates. Journal of Risk Research 25:3 ► pp. 347 ff.
Norén, Coco & Jérôme Josserand
2015. Intervention et compte rendu du débat parlementaire européen – une question de diamésie ?. Studia Neophilologica 87:1 ► pp. 84 ff.
Och, Malliga
2020. Manterrupting in the German Bundestag: Gendered Opposition to Female Members of Parliament?. Politics & Gender 16:2 ► pp. 388 ff.
Partington, Alan
2012. Corpus Analysis of Political Language. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
Partington, Alan & Jane Helen Johnson
2020. Corpus Analysis of Political Language. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Philips, Lisa & Allan K. McDougall
2007. Le pouvoir et l’appropriation des discours dans les constructions parlementaires au Canada. Anthropologie et Sociétés 31:1 ► pp. 97 ff.
Pietsch, Juliet
2017. Explaining the political under-representation of Asian Australians: geographical concentration and voting patterns. Political Science 69:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Poulos, Elenie
2020. The power of belief: religious freedom in Australian parliamentary debates on same-sex marriage. Australian Journal of Political Science 55:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Qadir, Ali & Jukka Syväterä
2021. The moral authority of science: Evidence from parliamentary debates in seven countries. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology 8:3 ► pp. 265 ff.
Sarfo-Kantankah, Kwabena Sarfo & Ben Kudus Yussif
2019. The use of actually in a non-native English parliamentary context: a corpus study. <i>WORD</i> 65:4 ► pp. 234 ff.
Schäfer, Sophie
2018. Manöver im politischen Diskurs. In Soziologie der Parlamente, ► pp. 231 ff.
Shen, Lin
2023. Culture and Explicitness of Persuasion: Linguistic Evidence From a 51-Year Corpus-Based Cross-Cultural Comparison of the United Nations General Debate Speeches Across 55 Countries (1970-2020). Cross-Cultural Research 57:2-3 ► pp. 166 ff.
Sivenkova, Maria
2008. Expressing Commitment When Asking Multiunit Questions in Parliamentary Debates. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27:4 ► pp. 359 ff.
Tanasoca, Ana & Jensen Sass
2019. Ritual Deliberation. Journal of Political Philosophy 27:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Truan, Naomi
2021. Narratives of dialogue in parliamentary discourse. Journal of Language and Politics 20:4 ► pp. 563 ff.
van Dijk, Teun A.
Weiss, Daniel
2016. Types and functions of intertextual references in the Russian State Duma. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 61:1 ► pp. 184 ff.
Wilson, John & Karyn Stapleton
2012. Discourse in the shadows: Discursive construction and the Northern Ireland Assembly. Discourse & Society 23:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Hazel R. Wright & Marianne Høyen
2020. Discourses We Live By,
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2017. Literatur. In Jüdische Identitäten und antisemitische Politiken im österreichischen Parlament 1861-1933, ► pp. 301 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Communication Studies
Main BIC Subject
CF: Linguistics
Main BISAC Subject
LAN009000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General