2024. Wykorzystanie potencjału dowodowego lingwistyki w postępowaniach karnych. Rozważania biegłego sadowego. PRZEGLĄD POLICYJNY 152:4 ► pp. 141 ff.
Kuik, Cheng-Chwee
2023. Shades of grey: riskification and hedging in the Indo-Pacific. The Pacific Review 36:6 ► pp. 1181 ff.
Ragland, Miranda, Jennifer Harrell, Molly Ripper, Seth Pearson, Rachel Granberg & Robin Verble
2023. Gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity and socioeconomic factors influence how wildland firefighters communicate their work experiences. Frontiers in Communication 8
Abd-Alsahab, Abeer Mahdi & Dr. Sarab Khalil
2022. DECEPTIVE ROLES OF WOMEN IN ARABIC AND ENGLISH LITERATURE CONTEXT: A PRAGMATIC STUDY. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SOCIAL SCIENCES & HUMANITIES 12:02 ► pp. 396 ff.
Fu, Rongbo & Kefei Wang
2022. Hedging in interpreted and spontaneous speeches: a comparative study of Chinese and American political press briefings. Text & Talk 42:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Nikolić, Melina & Maja Nikolić
2022. Multiple hedging in the political interview. Reci Beograd 14:15 ► pp. 24 ff.
Lederman, Erica
2021. ‘Context, gestures, and smiles’: investigating linguistic and cultural attitudes in Rick Steves’s European phrasebooks. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 19:6 ► pp. 838 ff.
Capin, Daniéla, Céline Benninger & Elena Vladimirska
2020. De la catégorisation subjective : procédés et pratiques linguistiques. Langue française N° 207:3 ► pp. 7 ff.
Gu, Chonglong
2019. Mediating ‘face’ in triadic political communication: a CDA analysis of press conference interpreters’ discursive (re)construction of Chinese government’s image (1998–2017). Critical Discourse Studies 16:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
Murphy, James
2019. Openings: Terms, Conditions and Getting Started. In The Discursive Construction of Blame, ► pp. 17 ff.
2018. Style and Grammar in Political Discourse: Complementation and Its Argumentative-Rhetorical Potential. In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32], ► pp. 51 ff.
2012. We are surprised; wasn’t Iran disgraced there? A functional analysis of hedges and boosters in televised Iranian and American presidential debates. Discourse & Communication 6:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.