2024. Motivated reasoning and climate change: Comparing news sources, politicization, intensification, and qualification in denier versus believer subreddit comments. Applied Cognitive Psychology 38:1
Capin, Daniéla, Céline Benninger & Elena Vladimirska
2020. De la catégorisation subjective : procédés et pratiques linguistiques. Langue française N° 207:3 ► pp. 7 ff.
Fu, Rongbo & Jiaqi Tan
2024. Hedges in interpreted and non-interpreted English: A cross-modal, corpus-based study. Interpreting and Society
Fu, Rongbo & Kefei Wang
2022. Hedging in interpreted and spontaneous speeches: a comparative study of Chinese and American political press briefings. Text & Talk 42:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Gu, Chonglong
2019. Mediating ‘face’ in triadic political communication: a CDA analysis of press conference interpreters’ discursive (re)construction of Chinese government’s image (1998–2017). Critical Discourse Studies 16:2 ► pp. 201 ff.
2012. We are surprised; wasn’t Iran disgraced there? A functional analysis of hedges and boosters in televised Iranian and American presidential debates. Discourse & Communication 6:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
Kuik, Cheng-Chwee
2023. Shades of grey: riskification and hedging in the Indo-Pacific. The Pacific Review 36:6 ► pp. 1181 ff.
Lederman, Erica
2021. ‘Context, gestures, and smiles’: investigating linguistic and cultural attitudes in Rick Steves’s European phrasebooks. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change 19:6 ► pp. 838 ff.
Murphy, James
2019. Openings: Terms, Conditions and Getting Started. In The Discursive Construction of Blame, ► pp. 17 ff.
Nikolić, Melina & Maja Nikolić
2022. Multiple hedging in the political interview. Reci Beograd 14:15 ► pp. 24 ff.
Ragland, Miranda, Jennifer Harrell, Molly Ripper, Seth Pearson, Rachel Granberg & Robin Verble
2023. Gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity and socioeconomic factors influence how wildland firefighters communicate their work experiences. Frontiers in Communication 8
2018. Style and Grammar in Political Discourse: Complementation and Its Argumentative-Rhetorical Potential. In Argumentation and Language — Linguistic, Cognitive and Discursive Explorations [Argumentation Library, 32], ► pp. 51 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.