Part of
European Parliaments under Scrutiny: Discourse strategies and interaction practicesEdited by Cornelia Ilie
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 38] 2010
► pp. 193–222
Edited by Cornelia Ilie
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 38] 2010
► pp. 193–222
Managing dissent and interpersonal relations in the Romanian parliamentary discourse
Cited by
Cited by 6 other publications
Cionea, Ioana A., Ana-Maria Hopârtean, Carrisa S. Hoelscher, Irina A. Ileş & Sara K. Straub
2015. A Content Analysis of Arguing Behaviors: A Case Study of Romania as Compared to the United States. Argumentation and Advocacy 51:4 ► pp. 255 ff. 
CONSTANTINESCU, MIHAELA-VIORICA
2023. (Im)politeness from an Emic Perspective. Illustrations from Present Day Romanian Parliamentary Debates. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 2023:2 ► pp. 216 ff.
Franceschi, Valeria
Frantzi, Katerina T., Marianthi Georgalidou & Giorgos Giakoumakis
2019. Greek Parliamentary Discourse in the Years of the Economic Crisis. In Argumentation and Appraisal in Parliamentary Discourse [Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies, ], ► pp. 1 ff.
Hoinărescu, Liliana
2018. Definition as an argumentative strategy in parliamentary discourse. Language and Dialogue 8:2 ► pp. 209 ff.
Nowak, Bartholomäus
2019. Chapter 7. Impoliteness in parliamentary questions. In Political Discourse in Central, Eastern and Balkan Europe [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 84], ► pp. 147 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.