This chapter examines how the Chinese Communist Party has employed the discourse of stability to legitimate its authority since 1989. At the theoretical level, the Weberian understanding of legitimation is situated within the strategic-relational approach in order to better conceptualize the role played by discourse in legitimating regimes. At the methodical level, the stability discourse is analyzed using the discourse-historical method and particular attention is paid to the presentation of actors and the argumentation strategies employed to legitimate and delegitimate these actors. The People’s Daily newspaper is the site of analysis and three exceptional instances are selected for analysis: the 1989 ‘Beijing Spring’; 1999 ‘anti-Falun Gong’ campaign; and the 2005 ‘anti-Japan’ demonstrations. The main finding is that stability is ‘discursively flexible’, with its positive value consistently working to legitimate the Party-State’s authority and the negative value delegitimating the assigned ‘other’. Keywords: Legitimation; strategic-relational approach; discourse-historical method; critical discourse analysis; media; Chinese Communist Party; Falun Gong; Tiananmen Square; Sino-Japanese relations
Beijing Xinhua Domestic Service. 1999. “Official Says Falun Gong Most Serious Incident since Tiananmen.” 23July. Reprinted in BBC Summary of World Broadcasts—Far East FE/D3597/G (27July).
Benbao Pinglunyuan [Staff Commentator]. 1999. “Maintain the Overall Situation and Stability and Push Forward Reform and Development—Ninth Commentary on Tightening Efforts to Handle and Solve the ‘Falun Gong’ Problem.” Renmin ribao, 16August: 1.
Bezlova, Antoaneta. 2005 “Beijing Blacks Out Anti-Japan Protests.” Asia Times, 13April. [URL]
Bhaskar, Roy. 1989. Reclaiming Reality: A Critical Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. London: Verso.
Blecher, Marc. 2003. China against the Tides: Restructuring through Revolution, Radicalism and Reform. London: Continuum.
Callahan, William A. 2004. “National Insecurities: Humiliation, Salvation and Chinese Nationalism.” Alternatives 29 (2): 199–218.
Chan, Cheris Shun-ching. 2004. “The Falun Gong in China: a sociological perspective.” The China Quarterly 179: 665–683.
Chen, Cheng. 2005. “Institutional Legitimacy of an Authoritarian State: China in the mirror of Eastern Europe.” Problems of Post-Communism 52(4): 3–13.
Chen, Chiung Hwang. 2005. “Framing Falun Gong: Xinhua news agency’s coverage of the New Religious Movement in China.” Asian Journal of Communication 15(1): 16–36. >
Ching, Julia. 2005. “The Falun Gong: Religious and Political Implications.” In Religious Organizations and Democratization: Case Studies from Contemporary Asia, edited by Tun-Jen Cheng and Deborah A. Brown. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Christiansen, Flemming. 2000. “Beyond Chinese Statehood? Authoritative Representations of Nation and Ethnicity in the Late 1990s and Early 2000s,” synopsis for workshop on Multiple and Diasporic Identities: National and Ethnic Belongings in East Asia and Europe, Aalborg, 15–16 September.
Dickie, Murie and Anderlini, Jamil. 2010. “China closer to becoming Second-Largest Economy.” Financial Times, 30July. [URL]
Fang, Yew-Jin. 2001. “Reporting the Same Events? A Critical Analysis of Chinese Print News Media Texts.” Discourse and Society 12(5): 585–613. >
Farrer, James. 2005. “Nationalism Pits Shanghai against its Global Ambition.” YaleGlobal, 29April. [URL]
Fazhi ribao. 1999. “Laws Exist for the Banning of Falun Gong.” 25July. Reprinted in Chinese Law and Government 32(5) (1999): 43–45. >
Fowler, Roger. 1991. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.
Goldstein, Avery. 1994. “Trends in the study of Political Elites and Institutions in the People’s Republic of China.” The China Quarterly 139: 714–730. >
Grafstein, Robert. 1981. “The Failure of Weber’s Conception of Legitimacy: its causes and implications.” The Journal of Politics 43(2): 456–472. >
Gries, Peter Hays and Rosen, Stanley. 2004. “Introduction.” In State and Society in 21st-century China: Crisis, Contention and Legitimation, edited by Peter Hays Gries and Stanley Rosen. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Hay, Colin. 2002. Political Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
He, Henry Yuhuai. 2001. Dictionary of the Political Thought of the People’s Republic of China. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
He, Yinan. 2007. “History, Chinese Nationalism and the Emerging Sino-Japanese Conflict.” Journal of Contemporary China 16(50): 1–24. >
He, Zhenhua. 2005. “Cong goujian hexie shehui kan wending” (“From Building a Harmonious Society See Stability”). Renmin ribao, 17April: 1.
Holmes, Leslie. 1993. The End of Communist Power: Anti-corruption Campaigns and Legitimation Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jessop, Bob. 1990. State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in its Place. Cambridge: Polity Press.
2005. “Critical Realism and the Strategic-Relational Approach.” New Formations 56: 40–53.
2007. State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jin, Qiu. 2006. “The Politics of History and Historical Memory in China-Japan Relations.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 11(1): 25–53. >
Manion, Melanie. 1990. “Introduction: Reluctant Duelists: the Logic of the 1989 Protests and Massacre.” In Beijing Spring, 1989: Confrontation and Conflict: the basic documents, edited by Michel Oksenberg, Lawrence R. Sullivan, and Marc Lambert. London: M.E. Sharpe.
Marsh, David and Furlong, Paul. 2002. “A Skin not a Sweater: Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, edited by David Marsh and Gerry Stoker. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
McAnulla, Stuart. 2002. “Structure and Agency.” In Theory and Methods in Political Science, edited by David Marsh and Gerry Stoker. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Meyer, Michael. 2001. “Between Theory, Method and Politics: Positioning of the Approaches to CDA.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. London: Sage.
Miyazaki, Jamie. 2005. “Textbook Row Stirs Japanese Concern.” BBC News, 13April. [URL]
Mooney, Paul. 2005. “Internet Fans Flames of Chinese Nationalism.” YaleGlobal, 4April. [URL]
Nathan, Andrew J. 2003. “Authoritarian Resilience.” Journal of Democracy 14(1): 6–17. >
Oksenberg, Michel with Sullivan, Lawrence R. 1990. Preface to Beijing Spring, 1989: Confrontation and Conflict: the basic documents, edited by Michel Oksenberg, Lawrence R. Sullivan and Marc Lambert. London: M.E. Sharpe.
Penny, Benjamin. 2003. “The Life and Times of Li Hongzhi: Falun Gong and religious biography.” The China Quarterly 175: 643–661. >
Perry, Elizabeth J. 2001. “Challenging the Mandate of Heaven: Popular Protest in Modern China.” Critical Asian Studies 33(2): 163–180. >
2007) “Studying Chinese Politics: Farewell to Revolution?” The China Journal 57: 1–22.
Qiu, Jack Linchuan. 2000. “Interpreting the Dengist Rhetoric of Building Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.” In Chinese Perspectives in Rhetoric and Communication, edited D. Ray Heisey. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing.
Renmin Ribao. 1999a, 23July. “Circular of the CCP Central Committee Forbidding Communist Party Members from Practicing Falun Dafa.” Reprinted in Chinese Law and Government 32(5) (1999): 14–18. >
1999b, 23July. “On the Resolution Outlawing the Falun Dafa Research Society.” Reprinted in Chinese Law and Government 32(5) (1999): 30–32.
1999c, 23July. “Public notice of the Public Security Ministry of the People’s Republic of China.” Reprinted Chinese Law and Government 32(5) (1999): 33–36. >
Saich, Tony. 2004. Governance and Politics of China. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schoenhals, Michael. 1999. “Political Movements, Change and Stability: the Chinese Communist Party in Power.” The China Quarterly 159: 595–605. >
Shambaugh, David L. 2007. “China’s Propaganda System: Institutions, Processes and Efficacy.” The China Journal 57: 25–58.
Shelun [editorial]. 1989, 26April. “Bixu qizhi xianmingde fandui dongluan” (“It is Necessary to Take a Clear-cut Stand”). Renmin ribao: 1.
1989, 29April. “Weihu daju weihu wending” (“Safeguard the Overall Situation, Safeguard Stability”). Renmin ribao: 1.
Shi, Tianjian. 1990. “The Democratic Movement in China in 1989: Dynamics and Failure.” Asian Survey 30(12): 1186–1205. >
Shirk, Susan L. 2007. China: Fragile Superpower. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shue, Vivienne. 2004. “Legitimacy Crisis in China?” In State and Society in 21st-century China: Crisis, Contention and Legitimation, edited by Peter Hays Gries and Stanley Rosen. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
Sidel, John. 1995. “The Philippines: The Languages of Legitimation.” In Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia: the Quest for Moral Authority, edited by Muthiah Alagappa. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Teiwes, Frederick C. 1984. Leadership, Legitimacy, and Conflict in China: from a Charismatic Mao to the Politics of Succession. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Tong, James. 2002. “An Organizational Analysis of the Falun Gong: Structure, Communications, Financing.” The China Quarterly 171: 636–660. >
Vaara, Eero, Tienari, Janne, and Laurila, Juha. 2006. “Pulp and Paper Fiction: on the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring.” Organization Studies 27: 789–810. >
van Dijk, Teun A. 1985. “Structures of News in the Press.” In Discourse and Communication: New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication, edited by Teun A. van Dijk. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. >
Wang, Shaoguang. 2000. “The Social and Political Implications of China’s WTO Membership,” Journal of Contemporary China 9(25): 373–405. >
Wang, Ruowang. 1989. “The Student Movement and Hu Yaobang Represent the Banner of Justice—Thoughts on Reading the 26 April Renmin Ribao Editorial.” Pai Hsing 192 16May: 17–19. In Foreign Broadcast Daily Service, Daily Report, 19May 1989: 43–47.
Wang, S. 2000. “The Social and Political Implications of China’s WTO Membership.” Journal of Contemporary China 9(25): 373–405. >
Weatherley, Robert. 2006. Politics in China since 1949: Legitimizing Authoritarian Rule. London: Routledge.
Weber, Max. 1964. The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by A.M. Henderson and edited by Talcott Parsons. New York: The Free Press.
1978. Economy and Society: an Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Edited by G Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Werlich, Egon. 1982. A Text Grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer.
Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. London: Sage.
Wodak, Ruth and van Leeuwen, Theo. 2002. “Discourses of Un/Employment in Europe: the Austrian case.” Text 22(3): 345–367. >
Wong, John. 1999. “The Mystery of Falun Gong: its rise and fall in China.” in The Mystery of China’s Falun Gong: its Rise and its sociological implications, edited by John Wong and William T. Liu. Singapore: World Scientific Press and Singapore University Press. >
Wong, Linda. 2004. “Market Reforms, Globalization and Social Justice in China.” Journal of Contemporary China 13(38): 151–171. >
Wu, Guoguang. 1994. “Command Communication: the Politics of Editorial Formulation in the People’s Daily.” The China Quarterly 137: 194–211. >
Xia, Ming and Hua, Shiping. 1999. “Guest Editors’ Introduction.” Chinese Law and Government 32(5): 5–13. >
Xiao, Hongyan. 2001. “Falun Gong and the Ideological Crisis of the Chinese Communist Party: Marxist Atheism vs. Vulgar Theism.” East Asia: an International Quarterly 19(1-2): 123–143.
Yao, Kevin and Wang, Aileen. 2013. “China lets Gini out of the bottle; Wide Wealth Gap.” Reuters, 18January. [URL]
Zhao, Suisheng. 1998. “A State-Led Nationalism: the Patriotic Education Campaign in Post-Tiananmen China.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 31(3): 287–302. >
2005–2006. “China’s Pragmatic Nationalism: is it Manageable?” The Washington Quarterly 29(1): 131–144. >
Zhao, Yuezhi. 1998. Media, Market, and Democracy in China: between the Party Line and the Bottom Line. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Zheng, Shiping. 2003. “Leadership Change, Legitimacy, and Party Transition in China.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 8(1&2): 47–63. >
Zheng, Yongnian. 1999. Discovering Chinese Nationalism in China: Modernization, Identity, and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zheng, Yongnian and Lye, Liang Fook. 2005. “Political Legitimacy in Reform China: between Economic Performance and Democratization.” In Legitimacy: Ambiguities of Political Success or Failure in East and Southeast Asia, edited by Lynn White. Singapore: World Scientific Press. >
Zhong, Yang. 1996. “Legitimacy Crisis and Legitimation in China.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 26(2): 201–220. >
World Bank. 2010. World Development Indicators. Washington DC: World Bank. [URL]
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Ferrer, Alessandra
2023. A post‐imperial, pluralist nationalism? From the Five Nation Republic of China to multicultural Taiwan. Nations and Nationalism 29:3 ► pp. 1142 ff.
Liu, Yanhong, Stephen May & Lawrence Jun Zhang
2023. The ideological underpinnings in university English textbooks in China: A critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics approach. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development► pp. 1 ff.
Wang, Guofeng, Yilin Liu & Shengmeng Tu
2023. Discursive use of stability in New York Times’ coverage of China: a sentiment analysis approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1
Liu, Yanhong, Lawrence Jun Zhang & Li Yang
2022. A Corpus Linguistics Approach to the Representation of Western Religious Beliefs in Ten Series of Chinese University English Language Teaching Textbooks. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Wang, Guofeng
2020. Legitimization strategies in China's official media: the 2018 vaccine scandal in China. Social Semiotics 30:5 ► pp. 685 ff.
Wing-Chun Ng, Toby
2020. Recontextualisation of Beijing’s voice: A critical discourse analysis of hegemony and resistance in Hong Kong political discourse. Discourse & Society 31:5 ► pp. 540 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.