Cover not available
Part of
Follow-ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across contexts and discourse domains
Edited by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 60] 2015
► pp. 83–108

Bravo for this editorial!

Users’ comments in discussion forums

ORCID logo
In this paper, I study how comments function as follow-ups in the discussion forums of online newspapers. Follow-ups recontextualize an object of discourse from its prior context to an ongoing context. A follow-up involves stance-taking, positioning, and negotiation of meaning. The data were obtained from one major French online newspaper called lemonde.fr. They consist of ten editorials with political and social topics, along with their subsequent comments. The first objective was to find out how, and by which linguistic means, writers express their stance and evaluate the editorials. It was found that they do it through axiological adjectives, explicit positioning, and various communicative acts, as well as by affective, epistemic, and ironic expressions. The second aim was to examine how the discussion forum posts target the prior discourse, and open up a negotiation, i.e., what types of responsive and initiative properties are used to negotiate the meaning. Findings indicate that the comments target either the content or the stance expressed in the editorial. By using them, users imply that they know more about the issue or they share the same view.
Published online: 20 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.60.04joh
References (48)
References
Angouri, Jo and Miriam A. Locher. 2012. “Theorising Disagreement.” Journal of Pragmatics 44 (12): 1549–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atifi, Hassan and Michel Marcoccia. 2012. “Follow-ups in Online Political Discussions.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 22–34. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg. [online]. URL: [URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.Google Scholar
Baym, Nancy. 1998. “Agreements and Disagreements in a Computer-Mediated Discussion.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 29 (4): 315–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika and Helen Caple. (eds.). 2012. News Discourse. London & New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bolter, Jay D. and Richard Grusin. 1999. Remediation. Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1966, 1974. Problèmes de linguistique générale. [Problems in General Linguistics]. Tomes I–II. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Charaudeau, Patrick. 1997. Le discours d’information médiatique. La construction du miroir social. [Media Information Discourse. The Construction of the Social Mirror]. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Deuze, Marc. 2008. “The Changing Context of News Work: Liquid Journalism and Monitorial Citizenship.” International Journal of Communication 2, 848–65.Google Scholar
Dostie, Gaétane. 2004. Pragmaticalisation et marquers discursifs. Analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique. [Pragmaticalization and Discourse Markers. Semantic and Lexicographic Analyses]. Bruxelles: De Boeck/Duculot. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DuBois, John. 2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In: Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ensink, Titus. 2012. “Internet Newspaper Discussion Lists. A Virtual Political Arena?” In Dialogue in Politics, ed. by Lawrence N. Berlin and Anita Fetzer, 21–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2004. Recontextualizing Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Challenges in Political Interviews.” In Political Discourse in the Media. Cross-cultural Perspectives, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Gerda E. Lauerbach, 161–195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber. 2012. “Introduction.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 3–4. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg – [online]. URL: [URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman. “Following Up Across Contexts and Discourse Domains: Introduction.” This volume.
Grimshaw, Allen D. 1990. “Introduction.” In Conflict Talk. Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, ed. by Allen D. Grimshaw, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, Helmut. 1993. “Evaluation Devices in Newspaper Reports.” Journal of Pragmatics 19: 469–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. “Questions and Strategic Orientation in Verbal Conflict Sequences.” Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1815–1857. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. “Intertextual References in Austrian Parliamentary Debates: Between Evaluation and Argumentation.” This volume.
Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where New and Old Media Collide. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Johansson, Marjut. 2006. “Constructing Objects of Discourse in the Broadcast Political Interview.” In Pragmatic Aspects of Political Discourse in the Media, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Elda Weizman. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (2): 216–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. “Editorial and its Comments. Follow-ups in a Discussion Forum.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 151–164. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg – [online]. URL: [URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.Google Scholar
. 2014. “Reading Digital News: Participation Roles, Activities, and Positionings.” Journal of Pragmatics 72: 31–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keisanen, Tiina. 2008. “Stancetaking as an Interactional Activity. Challenging the Prior Speaker.” In Stancetaking in Discourse, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 253–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine. 2006 [1980]. L’énonciation. De la subjectivité dans le langage. [Enunciation. About Subjectivity in the Language]. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Kleinke, Sonia. 2010. “Interactive Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication. Disagreement in an English and German Public News Group.” In Discourses in Interaction, ed. by Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, Marja-Liisa Helasvuo, Marjut Johansson and Mia Raitaniemi, 195–222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambiase, Jacqueline J. 2010. “Hanging by a Thread: Topic Development and Death in an Online Discussion of Breaking News.” Language@Internet 7.Google Scholar
Langlotz, Andreas and Miriam A. Locher. 2012. “Ways of Communicating Emotional Stance in Online Disagreements.” Journal of Pragmatics 44(12): 1591–606.Google Scholar
Le, Elisabeth. 2010. Editorials and the Power of Media. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1993. Reflexive Language: Reported speech and Metapragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marcoccia, Michel. 2004. “On-line Polylogues: Conversation Structure and Participation Framework in Internet Newsgroups.” Journal of Pragmatics 36: 115–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moirand, Sophie. 2007. Les discours de la presse quotidienne. Observer, analyser, comprendre. [Discourse in the Press. Observations, Analyses, and Interpretations]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell Atkinson J. and John Heritage, 56–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reich, Zvi. 2011. “User Comments: The Transformation of Participatory Space. Participatory Journalism.” In Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, ed. by Jane B. Singer, Alfred Hermida, David Domingo, Ari Heinonen, Steve Paulussen, Thorsten Quandt, Zvi Reich and Marina Vujnovic, 96–117. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, John E. and James Stanyer. 2011. “Reader Opinion in the Digital Age: Tabloid and Broadsheet Newspaper Websites and the Exercise of Political Voice.” Journalism: Theory , Practice and Criticism 12(8): 983–1003.Google Scholar
Ruiz, Carlos, David Domingo, Josep Lluís Micó, Javier Diaz-Noci, Koldo Meso, and Pere Masip. 2011. “Public Sphere 2.0? The Democratic Qualities of Citizen Debates in Online Newspapers.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 16: 463–87.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks. 1977. “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 54 (2): 361–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Jane B. 2009. “Separate Spaces: Discourse About the 2007 Scottish Elections on a National Newspaper Web Site.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 14: 477–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sivenkova, Maria. “Metacommunicative Follow-ups in British, German and Russian Political Webchats.” This volume.
Thompson, Geoff and Susan Hunston. 2000. “Evaluation: An Introduction.” In Geoff Thompson and Susan Hunston (eds.), Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vuchinich, Samuel. 1990. “The Sequential Organization of Closing in Verbal Family Conflict.” In Conflict Talk. Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, ed. by Allen D. Grimshaw, 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Patrick. 2013. “Discussion in the Comments Section: Factors Influencing Participation and Interactivity in Online Newspapers’ Reader Comments.” New Media & Society, online, July 2013, 1–17.Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 2012. “Negotiating Irony through Follow-Ups: Readers’ Comments on Op-Eds in the Daily Press.” In Proceedings of the ESF Strategic Workshop on Follow-ups Across Discourse Domains: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Their Forms and Functions, Würzburg (Germany), 31 May – 2 June 2012, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman and Elisabeth Reber, 263–276. Würzburg: Universität Würzburg – [online]. URL: [URL] URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:20-opus-71656.Google Scholar
. 2008. Positioning in Media Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Kleinke, Sonja
2023.  Top-down meets bottom-up. In Remedies against the Pandemic [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 102], ► pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Weizman, Elda
2023. Recontextualization practices: A scale of directness. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo
Xia, Jie
2023. Disagreement strategies and institutional face attack in Chinese mainstream media editorial comments on Weibo . Pragmatics and Society 14:1 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Ho, Janet
2022. Evading the Lockdown: Animal Metaphors and Dehumanization in Virtual Space. Metaphor and Symbol 37:1 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo
Weizman, Elda & Ayelet Kohn
2022. Resemblance in comments/posts interaction. Pragmatics and Society 13:5 ► pp. 861 ff. DOI logo
Shukrun-Nagar, Pnina
2020. “Hero, genius, king and Messiah”. In The Discourse of Indirectness [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 316], ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Musolff, Andreas
2019. Chapter 14. “They have lived in our street for six years now and still don’t speak a work [!] of English”. In Migration and Media [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 81], ► pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Weizman, Elda & Marjut Johansson
2019. Constructing ordinariness in online commenting in Hebrew1 and Finnish. In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 307], ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Chovanec, Jan
2018. Chapter 9. Irony as counter positioning. In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30], ► pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Chovanec, Jan
2023. Negotiating Hate and Conflict in Online Comments: Evidence from the NETLANG Corpus. In Hate Speech in Social Media, ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Eller, Monika
2018. “no prizes to anybody spotting my typo, by the way”. In The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 78], ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Molek-Kozakowska, Katarzyna & Jan Chovanec
2017. Media representations of the “other” Europeans. In Representing the Other in European Media Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 74], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. The digital agora of social media: Introduction. Discourse, Context & Media 19 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.