Cover not available
Part of
Follow-ups in Political Discourse: Explorations across contexts and discourse domains
Edited by Elda Weizman and Anita Fetzer
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 60] 2015
► pp. 231–262

Follow-ups in pre-structured communication

The case of treaty monitoring

This contribution outlines two theoretical frameworks – behaviorist and reflexive – for considering the discursive interaction between states and international organizations within treaty monitoring (a process of assessing states’ compliance with international treaties). Monitoring is seen as a communicative process, aimed at building and sustaining the interlocutors’ public images and constituted by a series of multi-directed follow-ups. This definition emphasizes the importance of anticipation and silence in pre-structured diplomatic communication. The two suggested frameworks lie across the ontological divide. The behaviorist framework relies on an actor/speaker-oriented view of social interaction, conceives of actors as rational, strategizing beings performing cost-benefit calculations to define their discursive choices, and conceptualizes the participants’ concern with their public image in terms of ‘face wants’. The reflexive framework looks at how states and international organizations (IOs) use the monitoring exchange to (re)construct their relationship while projecting a specific image into the public sphere. Continuity of the interaction, intensity and regularity of the exchange within treaty monitoring provide IOs with sources of power and thus allow rebalancing the initially asymmetrical set-up. The frameworks are illustrated using the example of the monitoring mechanism of the Council of Europe’s Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities.

Published online: 20 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.60.09mik
References
Alfredsson, Gudmundur, Jonas Grimheden, Bertram G. Ramcharan, and Alfred de Zayas
(eds) 2001 International Human Rights Monitoring Mechanisms. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Alston, Philip
(ed) 1995 The United Nations and Human Rights. A Critical Appraisal. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Alston, Philip, and James Crawford
(eds) 2000 The Future of UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring. Cambridge: Cambridge UP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arundale, Robert
2006 “Face as Relational and Interactional: A Communication Framework for Research on Face, Facework, and Politeness.” Journal of Politeness Research. Language, Behaviour, Culture 2 (2): 193–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail
2006 The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Edited by M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore
2004 Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca etc: Cornell UP.Google Scholar
Baxter, Leslie, and Barbara Montgomery
1996 Relating: Dialogues and Dialectics. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Bilmes, Jack
1994 “Constituting Silence: Life in the World of Total Meaning.” Semiotica 98 (1–2): 73–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Boer-Buquicchio, Maud
2008 “Opening Address at the Conference on Ten Years of Protecting National Minorities and Regional or Minority Languages, 11 March 2008.” Available at [URL] (last accessed on January 26, 2015)
Bradford, William
2004 “International Legal Compliance: An Annotated Bibliography.” North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 30 (2): 379–428.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley
1977 The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politic. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Peter
“Follow-ups in Broadcast Political Discourse: Speeches, Interviews, and Parliamentary Questions”. This volume.
Davies, Bronwyn and Rom Harré
1990 “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ephratt, Michal
2008 “The Functions of Silence.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (11): 1909–1938. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte
2011 “Who Speaks? Discourse, the Subject and the Study of Identity in International Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (2): 327–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, Anita and Elda Weizman
“Following Up across Contexts and Discourse Domains: Introduction.” This volume.
Glinert, Lewis
2010 “Apologizing to China: Elastic Apologies and the Meta-Discourse of American Diplomats.” Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (1): 47–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Helmut
“Intertextual References in Austrian Parliamentary Debates: Between Evaluation and Argumentation.” This volume.
Hamo, Michal
“I have Nothing to do but Agree”: The Reciprocal Positioning of Journalists and Experts in Broadcast Television News Discourse. This volume.
Harré, Rom, Fathali M. Moghaddam, Tracey Pilkerton Cairnie, Daniel Rothbart, and Steven R. Sabat
2009 “Recent Advances in Positioning Theory”. Theory and Psychology 19 (1): 5–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, Oona
2008 “International Delegation and State Sovereignty.” Law and Contemporary Problems 71 (1): 115–149.Google Scholar
Henkin, Louis
1994 “Human Rights and State Sovereignty.” Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 25: 31–46.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Rainer
2004 “The Framework Convention at the End of the First Cycle of Monitoring.” In Filling the Frame: 5 years of Monitoring the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, 19–28. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian
2011 International Organizations: Politics, Law, Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jaworski, Adam
1993 The Power of Silence. Social and Pragmatic Perspectives. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 “White and White: Metacommunicative and Metaphorical Silences”. In Silence. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Adam Jaworski, 381–401. Berlin, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Marjut
“Bravo for this Editorial! Users’ Comments in Discussion Forums.” This volume.
Liechtenstein
2001 “Comments of the Government of Liechtenstein on the Opinion of the Advisory Committee on the Report on the Implementation of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities in Liechtenstein, 18 May 2001.”
Kurzon, Dennis
1997 Discourse of Silence. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mikalayeva, Liudmila
2011 “Negotiating Compliance: Discursive Choices in a Formalized Setting of Diplomatic Communication.” International Journal of Communication 21 (2): 5–28, available online at [URL] (last accessed on January 26, 2015)Google Scholar
Office of the United Nations Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)
2005 “The United Nations Human Rights Treaty System: An Introduction to the Core Human Rights Treaties and the Treaty Bodies”. Fact sheet no. 30. Available online at [URL] (last accessed on January 26, 2015)
Penman, Robyn
1990 “Facework & Politeness: Multiple Goals in Courtroom Discourse.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 9 (1–2): 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Alan
2004 “Commentary: Economic participation of national minorities.” In Filling the Frame: 5 years of monitoring the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, 98–110. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel
1985 “The Place of Silence in an Integrated Theory of Communication”. In Perspectives of Silence, ed. by Deborah Tannen and Muriel Saville-Troike, 3–18. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Schäffner, Christina
Follow-Ups in Interpreter-Mediated Interviews and Press Conferences.” This volume.
Sifianou, Maria
1997 “Silence and Politeness”. In Silence. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Adam Jaworski, 63–84. Berlin, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schwimmer, Walter
2004 “Opening Speech”, In Filling the Frame: 5 years of monitoring the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, 11–13. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron, Suzanne Wong Scollon, and Rodney H. Jones
2012 Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. 3rd edition. Malden, MA, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sivenkova, Maria
“Metacommunicative follow-ups in British, German and Russian Political Webchats.” This volume.
Sobkowiak, Włodzimierz
1997 “Silence and Markedness Theory”. In Silence. Interdisciplinary Perspectives, ed. by Adam Jaworski, 39–61. Berlin, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1985 “Silence: Anything But”. In Perspectives of Silence, ed. by Deborah Tannen, and Muriel Saville-Troike, 93–111. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje
2004 “Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 10 (2): 189–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Young, Oran R
1979 Compliance and Public Authority. A Theory with International Applications. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Berlin, Lawrence N., Elda Weizman & Anita Fetzer
2015. Introduction. In The Dynamics of Political Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 259], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.