Cover not available
Part of
A Gender-based Approach to Parliamentary Discourse: The Andalusian Parliament
Edited by Catalina Fuentes Rodríguez and Gloria Álvarez-Benito
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 68] 2016
► pp. 195–212

Chapter 9
Time, gender and parliamentary discourse

| Universidad de Almería
| Universidad de Almería
| Universidad de Almería

The main objective of this chapter is to show the importance of politicians’ time management and its relation to gender. We focus on how men and women manage time through pauses and speech rate. The idea of rhythmic pattern has already been studied (Bañón, Arcos and Requena 2012), and pausative pattern has been discussed in relation to the electoral political debate.

Our hypothesis is that women and men in positions of responsibility in the Andalusian Parliament handle time management differently, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Therefore, we analysed the interventions of several regional ministers of the Andalusian Government to study whether pauses, length and speed of MPs’ speeches have a strategic persuasive or argumentative value.

Keywords: Time, gender, parliamentary discourse, pause, Andalusian Parliament, pausative pattern, time management, persuasive strategies, argumentative strategies
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Corpus
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Analysis
    • 4.1Quantitative analysis
    • 4.2Qualitative analysis
    • 4.3Regional Minister Mar Moreno
    • 4.4Regional Minister Antonio Ávila
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 1 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.68.10ban
References
Álvarez, A.
(2001) “La estructura Informativa de la Oralidad” in Estudios de Lingüística del Español volumen 15. Publicado en: [URL].
Bañón, A. M., Arcos, J. M. and S. Requena
(2012) “La gestión del tiempo en el discurso político parlamentario” in Discurso & Sociedad Vol. 6 (1), 49–78.Google Scholar
Bañón, A.M. and S. Requena
(2010) “Pausa y descortesía en el debate político-electoral” in Español Actual 94: 9–46.Google Scholar
Bruneau, T.
(2007) “Time, Change and Sociocultural Communication: A Chronemic Perspective” in Sign Systems Studies 35 (1/2): 89–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duez, D.
(1991) La pause dans la parole de l’homme politique. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar
(1999) “La fonction symbolique des pauses dans la parole de l’homme politique” in Faits de Langues 7 (13): 91–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunmire, P.
(2005) “Preempting the future: rhetoric and ideology of the future in political discourse” in Discourse & Society 16(4): 481–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, C. and E. Alcaide
(2007) La argumentación lingüística y sus medios de expresión. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Hyatt, D.
(2005) “Time for a change: a critical discourse analysis of synchronic context with diachronic relevance” in Discourse & Society 16 (4): 515–534. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Machuca, M. and C. de la Mota
(2006) “Estrategias pragmalingüísticas orales: el énfasis en la publicidad” in M. Villayandre (ed.), Actas del XXXV Simposio Internacional de la SEL (pp. 1126–1142). León: Universidad de León.Google Scholar
Rebollo, L.
(1997) “Pausas y ritmo en la lengua oral. Didáctica de la pronunciación” in Actas del VIII Congreso de ASELE, Centro Virtual Cervantes, pp. 667–676.Google Scholar
Van Eemeren, F.H.
(2012) Maniobras estratégicas en el discurso argumentativo. Madrid: CISC.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T.
(2008) Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar