Cover not available
Part of
Developing New Identities in Social Conflicts: Constructivist perspectives
Edited by Esperanza Morales-López and Alan Floyd
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 71] 2017
► pp. 273–284

Epilogue

Article outline
  • 1.Final thoughts on constructivism
  • 2.Relativism, again?
  • 3.Constructivism and post-capitalist alternatives
  • 4.Final remarks
  • References
Published online: 26 July 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.71.13mor
References (36)
References
Agar, Michael. 2004. “We Have Met the Other and We’re All Nonlinear: Ethnography as a Nonlinear Dynamic System.” Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 10 (2): 16–24.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson Inc.Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof. 2007. Complexity and Life.” In Reframing Complexity. Perspectives from the North and South, ed. by Fritjof Capra, Alicia Juarrero, Pedro Sotolongo and Jacco van Uden, 3–25. Mansfield, MA: ISCE Publishing.Google Scholar
Castells, Manuel. 2012. Redes de Indignación y Esperanza. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
Cilliers, Paul. 2007. “Why We Cannot Know Complex Things Completely.” In Reframing Complexity. Perspectives from the North and South, ed. by Fritjof Capra, Alicia Juarrero, Pedro Sotolongo and Jacco van Uden, 81–105. Mansfield, MA: ISCE Publishing.Google Scholar
Damasio, António R. 1994. El Error de Descartes. La Emoción, la Razón y el Cerebro Humano. Barcelona: Crítica, 2004.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman and Fairclough, Isabela. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis. A Method for Advances Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gomila, Tony and Calvo, Paco. 2008. “Directions for an Embodied Cognitive Science. Toward an Integrated Approach.” In Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach, ed. by Paco Calvo and Tony Gomila, 1–25. Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey. 2009. “Different Approaches to Multimodality.” In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal analysis, ed. by Carey Jewitt, 28–39. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Juarrero, Alicia. 2007. “Complex Dynamical Systems and the Problem of Identity.” In Reframing Complexity. Perspectives from the North and South, ed. by Fritjof Capra, Alicia Juarrero, Pedro Sotolongo and Jacco van Uden, 107–118. Mansfield, MA: ISCE Publishing.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion. Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto and Mouffe, Chantal. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical DemocraticPolitics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernesto. 2005. La Razón Populista. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane and Cameron, Lynne. 2008. Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
López Navia, Santiago A. 2010. El Arte de Hablar Bien y Convencer. Platón, Aristóteles, Cicerón y Quintiliano. Madrid: Planeta.Google Scholar
Massip-Bonet, Àngels. 2013. “Language as a Complex Adaptative System: Towards an Integrative Linguistics.” In Complexity Perspectives on Language, Communication and Society, ed. by Àngels Massip-Bonet and Albert Bastardas-Boada, 35–60. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maturana, Humberto and Varela, Fernando. 1998. The Tree of Knowledge. The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
Maturana, Humberto. 1996. La Realidad: ¿Objetiva o Construida? Vol. 1. Barcelona – México DF: Anthropos – Universidad Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Mead, George H. 1934. On Social Psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Montesano Montessori, Nicolina and Morales-López, Esperanza. 2015. “Multimodal Narrative as an Instrument for Social Change: Reinventing Democracy in Spain -the Case of 15M.” CADAAD. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines 7 (2): 200–219. ([URL]).
Morales-López, Esperanza. 2011. “Hacia dónde va el Análisis del discurso.” Tonos Digital 21. ([URL]).
. 2015. “Discourse Analysis: Constructivist Perspective and Transdisciplinarity.” In Applications of Complexity Theory in Language and Communication Sciences, ed. by Albert Bastardas-Boada, Àngels Massip-Bonet and Gemma Bel-Enguix (under editorial review).Google Scholar
. 2016. “De la perspectiva etnográfica al análisis crítico del discurso: investigación en un grupo de mujeres ecuatorianas.” In Queering Women’s and Gender Studies: A Multi-disciplinary and Multi-lingual Approach. ed. by Begoña Crespo, Isabel Moskowich, María Frías and Carolina Núñez-Puente. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholar Publishing. 45–66.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. 1979. Seis Estudios de Psicología. Barcelona: Seix Barral.Google Scholar
Pujante, David. 2003. Manual de Retórica. Madrid: Castalia.Google Scholar
Pujante, David and Morales-López, Esperanza. 2012. “Discurs, anàlisi crític i transdisciplinarietat.” In L’Ull Despert. Anàlisi Crítica dels Discursos d’Avui, ed. by Vicent Salvador, 81–104. Valencia: Edicions Tres i Quatre.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena and Culpeper, Jonatham (eds.). 2002. Cognitive Stylistics. Language and Cognition in Text Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sousa Santos, Boaventura de. 2014. “¿Reinventar las izquierdas?” [URL]. Accessed November 10th 2015.
Unger, Johann. 2015. “The Interdisciplinarity of Critical Discourse Studies Research.” Palgrave Communications. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco, Thompson, Evan and Rosch, Elionor. 1991. De Cuerpo Presente. Las Ciencias Cognitivas y la Experiencia Humana. Barcelona: Gedisa 1996.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. 1973. Metahistoria. La Imaginación Histórica en la Europa del Siglo XIX. México, DF: Fondo de Cultura Económica 2001.Google Scholar
. 1978. Tropics of Discourse. Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. El Texto Histórico como Artefacto Literario. Barcelona: Paidós – I.C.E. – Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Žižek, Slavoj. 2004. En Defensa de la Intolerancia. Madrid: Sequitur 2009.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Morales-López, Esperanza
2021. Form-function dialectics in the analysis of irony in political discourse. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics 34:2 ► pp. 527 ff. DOI logo
Morales-López, Esperanza
2022. What Does “¡Quédate en casa!” (‘Stay at Home!') Mean for a Poor Woman?. In Handbook of Research on Historical Pandemic Analysis and the Social Implications of COVID-19 [Advances in Human Services and Public Health, ], ► pp. 164 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.