Cover not available
Part of
Metaphor, Nation and Discourse
Edited by Ljiljana Šarić and Mateusz-Milan Stanojević
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 82] 2019
► pp. 101–126

Chapter 4
“Let’s work on our Serbian!”

Standard language ideology, metaphors and discourses about Serbian national identity in the newspaper Politika in 2015

This chapter explores the use of metaphors in the column “Let’s Safeguard Serbian” in the Serbian newspaper Politika in 2015. In this column, adherents of the standard language ideology offered advice about spelling, loanwords, and syntax as well as regarding the name of the language and preferred alphabet. Drawing on critical discourse analysis and metaphor analysis, I examine the link between prescriptivism and contemporary discourses on Serbian national identity. I argue that most metaphors appearing in texts that fall into “the complaint tradition” (Milroy and Milroy) do not reveal a clear-cut link between prescriptivism and nationalism. However, the complaint tradition also reactivates a rich repository of conventional(ized) metaphors and metonymies that reach back to Romanticism and have much more far-reaching implications ideologically.

Keywords: metaphors, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, Critical Metaphor Analysis, discourse metaphors, standard language ideology, Serbian standard language, Serbian national identity, Romanticism, discursive history of metaphors
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.“Let’s work on our Serbian”: The campaign and its reception and relationship to the ideology of the in
  • 3.What’s in a metaphor?: The “complaint tradition” remixed
  • 4.Language as the organic expression of the nation’s character
  • 5.Language and territory: The implications of
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 20 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.82.05ver
References

Primary sources

Aničić, Gradimir
2015 “Hleba i jezika.” Politika 1 September 2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Brborić, Veljko
2015 “Kampanja ‘Negujmo srpski jezik’ dala rezultate.” RTS (Radio-Televizija Srbije) 29 November 2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Bugarski, Ranko
2015 “Dezinformacije o Evropskoj jezičkoj povelji.” Politika, 19 October 2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Đogo, Gojko
2015 “Srbe žele prevesti u bosanski narod.” Srna (Novinska agencija Republike Srpske) 24 April 2015 Accessed 3 December 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Dragićević, Rajna
2015a “Sve je više boraca za nepismenost.” Politika 3 September 2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
2015b “Samo su misli proste a jezik ne može da bude prost.” Politika 20 September 2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Đurić, Maja
2015 “Koliko čuvamo srpski jezik: Da li je u toku pravopisni bunt?” N1 2 December 2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Knežević, Marija
2015 “Prošlo vreme književnog jezika.” Politika 30 November2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Kovačević, Miloš
2015 “O jednakosti srpskog jezika.” Politika 14 September2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
2016 “Bošnjački nije bosanski.” Politika 3 June2016 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Milanović, Aleksandar
2015 “Pogled izdaleka. ” Politika 28 October2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Miloradović, Sofija
2015 “Dijalektizmi su u modi.” Politika 30 September2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Petrović, Dragoljub
2015a “Srpskohrvatski jezik nikad nije postojao.” Politika 20 October2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
2015b “Dogovorimo se o predmetu spora.” Politika 6 December 2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Radić, Jovanka
2015 “Polna ravnopravnost uzmiče pred rodnom.” Politika 9 November2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Radovanović, Zoran
2015 “Tuđice nisu otmene reči.” Politika 4 September2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Radisavljević, Zoran
2015a “Srpski jezik se umnožava deljenjem.” Politika 23 April2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
2015b “Potrebna nam je jezička policija.” Politika 18 July2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Simić, Radoje
2015 “Gde su granice srpskog jezika.” Politika 2 September2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Stijović, Rada
2015 “Kulin ban je pisao ćirilicom.” Politika 19 September2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Tanasić, Sreto
2015a “Treba li nam glagol trebati.” Politika 25 November2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
2015b “Jeste da smo na Balkanu, ali imamo i svoje.” Politika 1 December2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Vulićević, Marina
2015a “Srpski jezik predaje hrvatski lektor.” Interview with Veljko Brborić. Politika 6 September2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
2015b “Sve što smo stvorili čuva se u jeziku.” Interview with Sreto Tanasić. Politika 13 September2015 Accessed 9 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar

Secondary sources

Aleksov, Bojan
2005 “Adamant and Treacherous: Serbian Historians on Religious Conversions.” In Myths and Boundaries in South-Eastern Europe, ed. by Pål Kolstø, 158–190. London: Hurst & Co.Google Scholar
Arsenijević, Boban
2015a “Trebamo (imati) standard [We Need (to Have) a Standard].” Blog 16 April2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
2015b “Je suis nepismen [Je Suis Illiterate].” Blog 22 April2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
2015c “Intervju 15 minuta (Interview with Aleksandar Stankov for the Programme 15 Minutes of the News Portal Južne Vesti).” Južne vesti 20 April2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
2015d “Malograđanska normativnost našeg mentaliteta [The Petit Bourgeois Normativity of our Mentality].” Interview with Marjana Stevanović. Danas 23 April 2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Bermel, Neil
2007 Linguistic Authority, Language Ideology, and Metaphor: The Czech Orthography Wars. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
1999. Language Ideological Debates. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonfiglio, Thomas Paul
2010 Mother Tongues and Nations: The Invention of the Native Speaker. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breuilly, John
2008 Introduction to Nations and Nationalism, 2nd ed., by Ernest Gellner, xiii–liv. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bugarski, Ranko
2004 “Language and Boundaries in the Yugoslav Context.” In Language, Discourse, and Borders in the Yugoslav Successor States, ed. by Helen Kelly-Holmes, and Brigitta Busch, 21–37. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Language, Identity and Borders in the Former Serbo-Croatian Area.” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 33 (3): 219–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Thomas
1970 “The War for a Serbian Language and Orthography.” Harvard Slavic Studies 5: 1–81.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan
2004 Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ćosić, Pavle
2015 “Srbi su najnepismeniji narod u Evropi [The Serbs are the Most Illiterate People in Europe].” Balkan Magazin 26 November 2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest
1983 Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goatly, Andrew
2011 “Conventional Metaphor and the Latent Ideology of Racism.” In Beyond Cognitive Metaphor: Perspectives on Literary Metaphor, ed. by Monika Fludernik, 258–280. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Robert D.
[2004] 2008 Language and Identity in the Balkans: Serbo-Croatian and its Disintegration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher
2008 “Critical Discourse Analysis and Metaphor: Toward a Theoretical Framework.” Critical Discourse Studies 5 (2): 91–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo-Dowing, Laura, and Blanca Kraljevic-Mujic
2017 “Metaphor and Persuasion in Commercial Advertising.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, ed. by Elena Semino, and Zsófia Demjén, 323–336. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ilić, Marija
2012 “Purizam u proučavanju srpskog kao manjinskog jezika: srpsko-mađarski jezički kontakt [Purism in the Study of Serbian as a Minority Language: Serbian-Hungarian Language Contact].” In Jezik i društvo, ed. by Jelena Filipović, and Julijana Vučo, 303–321. Belgrade: Faculty of Philology.Google Scholar
2014 “Collective Narrative: The Narrative on Croatian Language from Academic to Far-Right Discourses in Serbia.” Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology 1: 49–73.Google Scholar
Koerner, Konrad
1987 “On Schleicher and Trees.” In Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Henry M. Hoenigswald, and Linda F. Wiener, 109–113. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2002 Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
1980a Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1980b “Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language.” The Journal of Philosophy 77 (8): 453–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, Jeannette
2015 Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1981 Language and Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James
2001 “Language Ideologies and the Consequences of Standardization.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 5 (4): 530–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James, and Lesley Milroy
[1985] 2012 Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English. 4th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna
1987 “ ‘Organic’ and ‘Organism’ in Franz Bopp.” In Biological Metaphor and Cladistic Classification: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Henry M. Hoenigswald, and Linda F. Wiener, 81–107. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998 Nineteenth-Century Linguistics, vol. 4, ed. by Giulio Lepschy. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas
2000 “Political Imagery of Europe: A House Without Exit Doors?” Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 21 (3): 216–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Critical Discourse Studies 9 (3): 301–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Metaphor and Persuasion in Politics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language, ed. by Elena Semino, and Zsófia Demjén, 309–322. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas, and Jörg Zinken
(eds) 2009a Metaphor and Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009b “A Discourse-Centred Perspective on Metaphorical Meaning and Understanding.” In Metaphor and Discourse, ed. by Andreas Musolff, and Jörg Zinken, 1–8. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peti-Stantić, Anita
(ed.) 2008 Identitet jezika jezikom izrečen. Zbornik rasprava s okruglog stola o knjizi Roberta D. Greenberga Jezik i identitet na Balkanu [The Identity of Language Told by Language. Proceedings of the Round Table about Language and Identity in the Balkans by Robert D. Greenberg]. Zagreb: Srednja Europa.Google Scholar
Petrović, Tanja
2006 “Language Ideologies in Contact: The Case of Refugees from Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina in Serbia.” In Marginal Linguistic Identities: Studies in Slavic Contact and Borderland Varieties, ed. by Dieter Stern, and Christian Voss, 261–274. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2015 Srbija i njen jug. “Južnjački dijalekti” između jezika, kulture i politike [Serbia and its South. “Southern Dialects” between Language, Culture, and Politics].” Belgrade: Fabrika knjiga.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter
2003 “How Metonymic are Metaphors?” In Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by René Dirven, and Ralf Pörings, 407–434. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radić, Jovanka, and Sofija Miloradović
2009 “Srpski jezik u kontekstu nacionalnih identiteta – povodom srpske manjine u mađarskoj [Serbian in the Context of National Identities: the Case of the Serbian Minority in Hungary].” Južnoslovenski Filolog 65: 153–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul
1978 “The Metaphorical Process as Cognition, Imagination, and Feeling.” Critical Inquiry 5 (1): 143–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simonović, Marko
2015a “Od danas pišem neznam [From Today on, I Write I Dunno].” Peščanik 20 April2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
2015b “Redu ne trebaju organi reda [Order Does not Need Organs of Order].” Peščanik 13 May2015 Accessed 6 October 2017. [URL]Google Scholar
Šarić, Ljiljana
2015 “Metaphors in the Discourse of the National.” Družboslovne Razprave 31 (80): 47–65.Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg, Iina Hellsten, and Brigitte Nerlich
2007 “Discourse Metaphors.” In Body, Language, and Mind. Vol. 2, Sociocultural Situatedness, ed. by René Dirven, Tom Ziemke, Roslyn M. Frank, and Enrique Bernárdez, 363–385. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Bogetić, Ksenija
2022. Politics of resignification. Gender and Language 16:3 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Čičin-Šain, Višnja
2023. Metaphors and pseudometaphors of language as controversial messages in public discourse about Serbian. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 10:1 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.