Chapter 2
Fairies, Christmas miracles and sham marriages
A diachronic analysis of deliberate metaphors in Belgian political discourse
This research analyzes the use of potentially deliberate metaphors in Belgian governmental policy statements over a time span of ten years. The analysis of this type of metaphor allows for further investigation into metaphor variation. Our results suggest that one variable that plays a role in the variation of political metaphors is the political situation of a country: the more hectic the political landscape, the more metaphor variation might occur. Throughout this chapter, some of the most striking potentially deliberate metaphors and tendencies are discussed, with the aim of establishing a possible explanation for what drives metaphorical variation in political discourse.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical framework: CDA, CMT and DMT as starting points for political metaphor analysis
- 3.Data and method
- 3.1Description of the corpus and political context
- 3.2Methodology: The identification of potentially deliberate metaphors
- 4.Findings: Diachronic perspective on the variation of potentially deliberate metaphors in Belgian politics
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Concluding remarks
-
Notes
-
References
References (31)
References
Billig, M. & Macmillan, K. (2005). ‘Metaphor, Idiom and Ideology: The Search for “No Smoking Guns” across Time.’ Discourse and Society, 16 (4), 459–80.
Cameron, L. (2007). ‘Patterns of Metaphor Use in Reconciliation Talk.’ Discourse and Society, 18 (2), 197–222.
Carver, T. and Pikalo, J. (Eds.). (2008). Political Language and Metaphor: Interpreting and Changing the World. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In McHoul, A. & Rapley, M. (Eds.), How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods (pp. 25–38), London: Continuum.
Gibbs, R. W. (2015). Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 73–76.
Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London/New York: Routledge.
Heyvaert, P., Dodeigne, J., Perrez, J. & Reuchamps, M. (submitted). Metaphors in spontaneous political communication: A case study of the use of deliberate metaphors in informal political interviews.” Journal of Language and Politics.
Koller, V. & Davidson, P. (2008). Social Exclusion as Conceptual and Grammatical Metaphor: A Cross-Genre Study of British Policy-Making. Discourse and Society, 19 (3), 307–331.
Krennmayr, T. (2011). Metaphor in Newspapers. Utrecht: LOT Dissertation Series.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
La Chambre des Représentants de Belgique. URL: [URL]
Add Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphor We Live By. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Musolff, A. (2012). The Study of Metaphor as Part of Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9 (3), 301–310.
Musolff, A. (2016). Political Metaphor Analysis. Discourse and Scenarios. London/New York: Bloomsbury.
Perrez, J. & Reuchamps, M. (2014). Deliberate Metaphors in Political Discourse: The Case of Citizen Discourse. Metaphorik.de, 25, 7–41.
Perrez, J., Randour, F. & Reuchamps, M. (forthcoming). De l’uniformité du discours politique : analyse bibliométrique et linguistique de la catégorisation des discours politiques. CogniTextes.
Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T. & Steen, G. J. (2018). DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2 (2), 129–147.
Semino, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model for metaphor. Metaphor & Symbol, 23, 213–241.
Steen, G. J. (2015). Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72.
Steen, G. J. (2017). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14 (1), 1–24.
Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A., Krennmayr, T. & Pasma, T. (2010). A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Strauss, G. (1986). Der Politische Wortschatz. Tubingen: Narr.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Steen, Gerard J.
2023.
Thinking by metaphor, fast and slow: Deliberate Metaphor Theory offers a new model for metaphor and its comprehension.
Frontiers in Psychology 14
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.