Cover not available
Part of
The Language of Crisis: Metaphors, frames and discourses
Edited by Mimi Huang and Lise-Lotte Holmgreen
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 87] 2020
► pp. 51–86

Chapter 2
From economic crisis to austerity policies through conceptual metaphor

A corpus-based comparison of metaphors of crisis and austerity in the Portuguese press

This chapter analyses the role of conceptual metaphors in the conceptualization and ideological exploitation of the global financial crisis and the subsequent austerity policies in the Portuguese press. The analysis relies on a corpus of news and opinion articles published between September 2008 and March 2009, when the financial breakdown that led to the global economic crisis took place, in June-July 2011, after the entry of the Troika in Portugal and the announcement of the first austerity measures, and May 2013, when protests against the austerity policies intensified. Assuming the general frameworks of Cognitive Linguistics and Critical Discourse Analysis and corpus-based and discourse-based approaches to conceptual metaphor, the study highlights how metaphor can be a powerful conceptual and discourse strategy to frame economic, political and social issues and to serve emotional and ideological purposes.
Keywords: conceptual metaphor, Cognitive Linguistics, Critical Discourse Analysis, financial crisis, austerity policies, embodiment, persuasion, ideology
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical and methodological background
  • 3.The metaphorical conceptualization of the financial crisis
    • 3.1Propositional schemas
    • 3.2Image schemas
    • 3.3Event schemas
  • 4.The metaphorical conceptualization of austerity
    • 4.1Propositional schemas
    • 4.2Image schemas
    • 4.3Event schemas
    • 4.4Metaphors of austerity after 2011–2013
  • 5.Embodiment, ideology and morality of the metaphors of crisis and austerity
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
Published online: 16 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.87.02soa
References (50)
References
Bauman, Zygmunt. 2006. Liquid Fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bernárdez, Enrique. 2008. “Collective Cognition and Individual Activity: Variation, Language and Culture.” In Body, Language, and Mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural Situatedness, ed. by Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke, and Enrique Bernárdez, 137–166. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dabrowska, Ewa, and Dagmar Divjak. 2015. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, René, Frank Polzenhagen, and Hans-Georg Wolf. 2007. “Cognitive Linguistics, Ideology, and Critical Discourse Analysis.” In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Dirk Geeraerts, and Hubert Cuyckens, 1222–1240. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Frank, Roslyn M., René Dirven, Tom Ziemke, and Enrique Bernárdez (eds.). 2008. Body, Language, and Mind. Volume 2. Sociocultural Situatedness. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2010. “Recontextualizing Grammar: Underlying Trends in Thirty Years of Cognitive Linguistics.” In Cognitive Linguistics in Action: From Theory to Application and Back, ed. By Elżbieta Tabakowska, Micha Choinski, and Łukasz Wiraszka, 71–102. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.). 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hampe, Beate (ed.). 2005. From Perception to Meaning. Image schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harbulot, Christian, and Éric Delbecque. 2012. La Guerre Économique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Discourse.” In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Ewa Dabrowska, and Dagmar Divjak, 322–346. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holland, Dorothy, and Naomi Quinn (eds.). 1987. Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koller, Veronika. 2014. “Cognitive Linguistics and Ideology.” In The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Jeanette Littlemore, and John R. Taylor, 234–252. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2002. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Where Metaphors Come From. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krugman, Paul. 2010. “Myths of Austerity.” The New York Times, July 1. [URL]
. 2011. “When Austerity Fails.” The New York Times, May 22. [URL]
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Don’t Think of Elephant! Know your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. New York: Chelsea Green.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Musolff, Andreas, and Jorg Zinken (eds.). 2009. Metaphor and Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pishwa, Hanna (ed.). 2009. Language and Social Cognition. Expression of the Social Mind. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojo López, Ana María, and María Ángeles Orts Llopis. 2010. “Metaphorical Pattern Analysis in Financial Texts: Framing the Crisis in Positive or Negative Metaphorical Terms.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3300–3313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schank, Roger C., and Roger P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding. Hillsdale/New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharifian, Farzad. 2009. “On Collective Cognition and Language.” In Language and Social Cognition: Expression of the Social Mind, ed. by Hanna Pishwa, 163–180. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2011. Cultural Conceptualizations and Language: Theoretical Framework and Applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soares da Silva, Augusto. 2006. O Mundo dos Sentidos em Português: Polissemia, Semântica e Cognição [The World of Senses in Portuguese: Polysemy, Semantics and Cognition]. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
. 2013. “O que sabemos sobre a crise económica, pela metáfora. Conceptualizações metafóricas da crise na imprensa portuguesa.” [What we know about the economic crisis through metaphor. Metaphorical conceptualizations of the crisis in the Portuguese press] Revista Media & Jornalismo 23 (1): 11–34.Google Scholar
. 2015. “Discurso na mente e na comunidade. Para a sinergia entre Linguística Cognitiva e Análise (Crítica) do Discurso.” [Discourse in the mind and in the community. Toward a synergy between Cognitive Linguistics and (Critical) Discourse Analysis] Revista Portuguesa de Humanidades – Estudos Linguísticos 19 (1): 53–78.Google Scholar
. 2016. “The Persuasive (and Manipulative) Power of Metaphor in ‘Austerity’ Discourse: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Embodied and Moral Metaphors of Austerity in the Portuguese Press.” In Exploring Discourse Strategies in Socio-Cognitive Interaction: A Multimodal and Cross-Linguistic Approach, ed. by Manuela Romano, and M. Dolores Porto, 79–108. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Soares da Silva, Augusto, Maria Josep Cuenca, and Manuela Romano. 2017. “The Conceptualisation of AUSTERITY in the Portuguese, Spanish and Irish Press.” In Advances in Cultural Linguistics, ed. by Farzad Sharifian, 345–368. Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steen, Gerard J. 2011. “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor – Now New and Improved!” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 26–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2006. “Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy.” In Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, ed. by Anatol Stefanowitsch, and Stephan Th. Gries, 1–16. Berlin/NewYork: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol, and Stefan Th. Gries. 2006. Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12: 49–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. I: Concept Structuring Systems. Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun (ed.). 1997. Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer (eds.). 2003. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha, and Esa Itkonen (eds.). 2008. The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Peterssen, Silvia & Augusto Soares da Silva
2024. Polarising metaphors in the Venezuelan Presidential Crisis. Journal of Language and Politics 23:4 ► pp. 588 ff. DOI logo
Hohaus, Pascal
2022. Chapter 1. Communicating science in crisis societies. In Science Communication in Times of Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 96], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.