Part of
Discourse Studies in Public CommunicationEdited by Eliecer Crespo-Fernández
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 92] 2021
► pp. 39–58
Edited by Eliecer Crespo-Fernández
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 92] 2021
► pp. 39–58
Chapter 2Political and journalistic discourse regarding the Catalan
declaration of independence
A critical analysis
As van Dijk argues, ideologies are social beliefs which are usually transmitted through discourse, and therefore journalistic and political texts are seen to be two trusted means of communication which are ideal for that function. Within the framework of the relation between language and ideology, my aim is to carry out a critical discourse analysis of various texts of this type. I shall begin by comparing the content of seven different newspapers published on 28 October 2017, the day after the Catalan Parliament’s unilateral declaration of independence (UDI). Four of these are national in scope (ABC, El País, El Mundo, and La Razón) and three are published in Catalonia (La Vanguardia, El Periódico de Catalunya, and Ara). I then focus my attention on the information expressed in two of these, namely ABC and La Vanguardia, with the aim of examining the different ways the same information is treated and the linguistic mechanisms used to downplay or enhance the same facts for different ideological purposes. In a similar vein, I go on to analyse the different discourse approaches adopted by the main political parties when dealing with the concept of the State in their respective manifestos for the 2019 general election.
Keywords: political discourse, journalistic discourse, ideology, nationalism, propaganda, Spain, Catalonia
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Journalistic language, political language, and ideology
- 3.The treatment of the unilateral declaration of independence in the Spanish and Catalan press
- 4.The concept of Spain in the political discourse of the 2019 general election
- 5.Conclusions
-
Notes -
References -
Appendix
References
Bowell, Tracy, and Kemp, Gary
2002 Critical Thinking. A Concise Guide. New York: Routledge. 
Casas Gómez, Miguel
2009 “Towards a New Approach to the Linguistic
Definition of Euphemism.” Language Sciences 31: 725–739.
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer
2013 “Words as Weapons for Mass Persuasion: Dysphemism
in Churchill’s Wartime Speeches.” Text & Talk 33 (3): 310–330.
2018 “Euphemism as a Discursive Strategy in US Local
and State Politics.” Journal of Language and Politics 17 (6): 789–811.
Fairclough, Norman
1995 Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Fernández Lagunilla, Marina
1999 La lengua en la comunicación política II:
La palabra del poder [Language in political communication:
The word of power]. Madrid: Arco Libros.
Fernández Smith, Gérard
2017a “Aspectos pragmáticos y discursivos
de los usos eufemísticos en la comunicación
pública [Pragmatic and discursive aspects of
euphemistic uses in public communication].” RILCE 33 (3): 1142–1170.
2017b “Instrumentos lingüísticos de los
discursos de odio en la prensa digital [Linguistic tools of the discourse of
hate in online press].” Fragmentum 50: 99–122.
Fernández Smith, Gérard, and Casas Gómez, Miguel
2018 “From Lexicon to Discourse in the Linguistic
Expression of Taboo: Configuring New Social
Realities.” In Taboo in Discourse. Studies on Attenuation and Offence
in Communication, ed. by Eliecer Crespo-Fernández, 25–52. Bern: Peter Lang.
Forgas Berdet, Esther
2013 “Ideología y lenguaje periodístico.
Los titulares en la prensa hispana [Ideology and journalistic language.
Headings in Hispanic press].” In Actas del XXVI Congreso Internacional de Lingüística y
de Filología Románicas, ed. by Emili Casanova Herrero, and Cesáreo Calvo Rigual, 487–498. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina
1999 La organización informativa del
texto [The informative structure of
texts]. Madrid: Arco Libros.
García Rodríguez, Rocío I.
2005 “Mecanismos de cohesión léxica:
análisis comparativo de algunas propuestas
clasificatorias [Mechanisms of lexical cohesion: A
comparative analysis of some proposals for
classification].” Interlingüística 16 (1): 503–515.
Martín Rojo, María Luisa
2003 “El análisis crítico del discurso.
Fronteras y exclusión social en los discursos
racistas [Critical Discourse Analysis. Borders
and social exclusion].” In Análisis del discurso. Manual para las
ciencias sociales [Discourse Analysis. Handbook of
social sciences], ed. by Lupicinio Íñiguez Rueda, 157–191. Barcelona: UOC.
Martínez Albertos, José Luis
1989 El lenguaje periodístico [Journalistic language]. Madrid: Paraninfo.
Musolff, Andreas
2010 Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust. The Concept of the
Body Politic. New York and London: Routledge.
Sánchez García, Francisco José
2018 Eufemismos del discurso político. Las
claves lingüísticas del arte del disimulo [Euphemisms in political discourse.
Linguistic keys for the art of concealment]. Madrid: Visor.
Tittle, Peg
2011 Critical Thinking. An Appeal to Reason. New York: Routledge.
van Dijk, Teun A.
1999 “El análisis crítico del
discurso [Critical Discourse
Analysis].” Anthropos 186: 23–36.
2003 Ideología y discurso. Una introducción
multidisciplinaria [Ideology and discourse. A
multidisciplinary introduction]. Barcelona: Ariel.
Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer
2015 “Critical Discourse Studies: History, Agenda,
Theory and Methodology.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 1–22. London: SAGE.