Cover not available
Part of
Discourse Studies in Public Communication
Edited by Eliecer Crespo-Fernández
[Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture 92] 2021
► pp. 177–198

Chapter 8
Cyberbullying and gender

Exploring socially deviant behavioural practices among teenagers on Twitter

ORCID logo | Universidad de Alcalá, Spain
Over the last two decades, there is a growing body of feminist studies that discusses both the psychological and social benefits and the negative effects of social media use among teenagers. Using threads taken from Twitter, understood as a blend of social media, blogging, and texting, the present study aims to explore, from a gender-based approach, the discursive strategies and self-presentation strategies both male and female teenagers deploy and the impressions that they exhibit when they verbally abuse and victimise others in their own threads or somebody else’s. The study of male and female interpersonal socially deviant practices on Twitter not only provides a number of preliminary answers to why gender matters in the study of cyberbullying, but also casts light on a gender-sensitive construction of the used gendered strategies in verbal cyberbullying. Furthermore, the study makes it possible to address essential linkages between the micro-level (i.e., the individual) and the macro-level (i.e., the social action in this public sphere).
Keywords: public discourse, Twitter, cyberbullying, discourse analysis, gender
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Disclosure of personal information, impression management, and cyberbullying
  • 3.Engendering cyberbullying on Twitter
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Cyberbullying sample
    • 4.2Measures and coding process
    • 4.3Analysis of sequences
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1Public communication: Topics discussed and disclosure of personal information
    • 5.2Interpersonal behavioural practices: Exploring male self-presentation strategies
    • 5.3Interpersonal behavioural practices: Exploring female self-presentation strategies
  • 6.Discussion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.92.08gar
References (83)
References
Álvarez-García, David, Alejandra Barreiro-Collazo, and José Carlos Núñez. 2017. “Cyberaggression among Adolescents: Prevalence and Gender Differences.” Comunicar 25 (50): 89–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Ronald E. 2002. “Youth and Information Technology.” In The Future of Adolescent Experience: Societal Trends and the Transition to Adulthood, ed. by Jeylan Mortimor, and Reed W. Larson, 175–207. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Archibald, Andrea B., Julia A. Graber, and Jeanne Brooks-Gunn. 2003. “Pubertal Processes and Physiological Growth in Adolescence.” In Blackwell Handbook of Adolescence, ed. by Arthur G. Adams, and Michael Berzonsky, 24–47. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beran, Tanya, Faye Mishna, and Lauren B. McInroy. 2015. “Children’s Experiences of Cyberbullying: A Canadian National Study.” Child Sch. 37: 207–214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Michael, and Robert Reimann. 2001. “Introduction.” In Queer Families, Queer Politics, ed. by Michael Bernstein, and Robert Reimann 1–17. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Bradford B. 2004. “Adolescents’ Relationships with Peers.” In Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, ed. by Richard M. Lerner, and Laurence Steinberg, 363–394. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bute, Monte. 2016. “A Backstage Sociologist: Autoethnography and a Populist Vision.” The American Sociologist 47 (4): 499–515. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canter, Lily. 2015. “Personalised Tweeting.” Digital Journalism 3 (6): 888–907. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christofferson, Jenna P. 2016. “How is Social Networking Sites Effecting Teen’s Social and Emotional Development: A Systemic Review.” [URL]
Connell, Raewyn. 2011. Confronting Equality: Gender, Knowledge and Global Change. Cambridge: Polity Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craig, Wendy M., and Debra J. Pepler. 2003. “Identifying and Targeting Risk for Involvement in Bullying and Victimization.” The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 48 (9): 577–582. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cummings, Jonathon N., Brian Butler, and Robert E. Kraut. 2002. “The Quality of Online Social Relationships.” Communications of the ACM 45 (7): 103–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delgado Domenech, Beatriz, and Raquel Escortell Sánchez. 2018. “Sex and Grade Differences in Cyberbullying of Spanish Students of 5th and 6th Grade of Primary Education.” Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology 34 (3): 472–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dellasega, Cheryl, and Charisse Nixon. 2003. Girl Wars: 12 Strategies that will End the Female Bullying. New York: Fireside Publishing.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, Eszter Hargittai, Russell W. Neuman, and John P. Robinson. 2001. “Social Implications of the Internet.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 307–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobson, Amy. 2014a. “Laddishness Online: the Possible Significations and Significance of ‘Performative Shamelessness’ for Young Women in the Post-feminist Context.” Cultural Studies 28 (1): 142–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014b. “Performative Shamelessness on Young Women’s Social Network Sites: Shielding the Self and Resisting Gender Melancholia.” Feminism & Psychology 24 (1): 97–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Postfeminist Digital Cultures: Femininity, Social Media, and Self-representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorias, Michael. 2004. Dead Boys Can’t Dance – Sexual Orientation, Masculinity, and Suicide. Quebec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Erik H. 1963. Childhood and Society. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Finkelhor, David, Kimberly J. Mitchell, and Janis Wolak. 2000. Online Victimisation: A Report on the Nation’s Youth. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.Google Scholar
Finkelhor, David, Robert Ormrod, Heather A. Turner, and Sherry L. Hamby. 2005. “The Victimization of Children and Youth: A Comprehensive, National Survey.” Child Maltreat 10: 5–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Finkelhor, David, Lisa M. Jones, and Annie Shattuck. 2010a. Updated Trends in Child Maltreatment. Crimes against Children Research Centre. [URL]
Finkelhor, David, Heather A. Turner, Robert Ormrod, and Sherry L. Hamby. 2010b. “Trends in Childhood Violence and Abuse Exposure: Evidence from two National Surveys.” Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 164: 238–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galambos, Nancy L. 2004. “Gender and Gender Role Development in Adolescence.” In Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, ed. by Richard M. Lerner, and Laurence Steinberg, 233–261. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
García-Gómez, Antonio. 2013. “Rethinking Agency: Pornified Discourses and Shifting Gendered Subjectivities.” In Identity: Beyond Tradition and McWorld Neoliberalism, ed. by Brian Goss, and Christopher Chávez, 191–213. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Goffman, Ervin. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Gottman, John M. 1979. Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Halldorsson, Vidar, Thorolfur Thorlindsson, and Michael A. Katovich. 2017. “Teamwork in Sport: A Sociological Analysis.” Sport in Society 20 (9): 1281–1296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammer, Mitchell R. 2001. “Conflict Negotiation under Crisis Conditions.” In The Language of Conflict Resolution, ed. by William F. Eadie, and Paul. E. Nelson, 57–80. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hentschel, Tanja, Madeline Heilman, and Claudia Peus. 2019. “The Multiple Dimensions of Gender Stereotypes: A Current Look at Men’s and Women’s Characterizations of Others and Themselves.” Frontiers in Psychology 10 (11). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higson, Robert. 2005. “Bully Boys: The School of Hard Knocks.” The Weekend Australian Magazine, January 29–30. Sydney: The Australian.Google Scholar
Hinduja, Sameer, and Justin W. Patchin. 2015. Bullying beyond the Schoolyard: Preventing and Responding to Cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A., and Graham M. Vaughan. 2010. Essentials of Social Psychology. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Huffaker, David. 2006. “Teen Blogs Exposed: The Private Lives of Teens Made Public.” Presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science in St. Louis, MO., February 16–19. [URL]
Jackson, Carolyn. 2006. Lads and Ladettes in School: Gender and a Fear of Failure. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Java, Aksay, Belle Tseng, Xiaodan Song, and Tim Finin. 2007. “Why we Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities.” Proceedings of the Joint 9th WEBKDD and 1st SNA-KDD Workshop . DOI logo
Jones, Edward E. 1990. Interpersonal Perception. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Keshelashvili, Ana. 2005. Patterns of Self-Expression and Impression Management in Blogs. Unpublished doctoral thesis. [URL]
Kimmel, Michael S., and Matthew Mahler. 2003. “Adolescent Masculinity, Homophobia, and Violence: Random School Shootings, 1982–2001.” The American Behavioral Scientist 46: 1439–1458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhlmann, Stefan G. 2005. “Kids Behaving Badly: Educators Study the Cause and Effect of School Violence.” The University of Iowa Spectator 38 (2): 9.Google Scholar
Kumar, Ravi, Jasmine Novak, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Andrew Tomkins. 2005. “On the Bursty Evolution of Blogspace.” World Wide Web 8 (2): 159–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leary, Mark R., and Robin M. Kowalski. 1990. “Impression Management: A Literature Review and two Component Model.” Psychological Bulletin 107: 34–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenhart, Amanda, Mary Madden, and Paul Hitlin. 2005. Teens and Technology: Youth are Leading the Transition to a Fully Wired and Mobile Nation. Washington D.C.: PEW Internet and Family Life.Google Scholar
Leppänen, Sirpa. 2008. “Cybergirls in Trouble? Fan Fiction as a Discursive Space for Interrogating Gender and Sexuality.” In Identity Trouble. Critical Discourse and Contested Identities, ed. by Carmen R. Caldas-Coulthard, and Rick Iedema, 156–179. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Litosseliti, Lia. 2006. Gender and Language: Theory and Practice. London: Arnold. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, Sonia, and Magdalena Bober. 2005. UK Children Go Online: Final Report of Key Project Findings. [URL]
Maíz-Arévalo, Carmen. 2017a. “‘A Promise is a Promise… but what about Threats?’: An English/Spanish Contrastive Analysis of the Verbs Promise-Prometer and Threaten-Amenazar.” Kalbotyra 70: 79–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017b. “Expressive Speech Acts in Educational E-chats.” Sociocultural Pragmatics 5 (2): 151–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017c. “Small Talk is not Cheap: Phatic Computer-mediated Communication in Intercultural Classes.” Computer Assisted Language Learning 30: 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. “Solo un poquito: El uso y funciones del diminutivo en español peninsular en dos grupos de Facebook [Just a little bit: use and functions of the diminutive suffix in peninsular Spanish in two Facebook groups].” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 73: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marwick, Alice E., and Danah Boyd. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media and Society 13: 96–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, Laurie. 2003. “Teaching an Old Genre New Tricks: The Diary on the Internet.” Biography. An Interdisciplinary Quarterly 26: 24–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Charles F. 2003. “The World Wide Web as Linguistic Corpus.” In Corpus Analysis: Language Structure and Language Use, ed. by Paul Leistyna, and Charles F. Meyer, 241–254. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mischaud, Edward. 2007. “Twitter: Expressions of the Whole Self. An Investigation into User Appropriation of a Web-based Communications Platform.” London: Media@lse. [URL]
Mishna, Fayne, Charlene Cook, Tahany Gadalla, Joanne Daciuk, and Steven Solomon. 2010. “Cyber Bullying Behaviors among Middle and High School Students.” American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 80 (3): 362–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Frank. 2018. “Taking Goffman Seriously: Developing Strategy-as-practice.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 53: 16–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myrttinen, Henri. 2003. “Disarming Masculinities.” Disarmament Forum 4. UNIDIR: Geneva.Google Scholar
Navarro, Raúl, Santiago Yubero, and Elisa Larrañaga. 2016. Cyberbullying across the Globe: Gender, Family, and Mental Health. Cham: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niedenthal, Paula, and François Ric. 2017. The Psychology of Emotion. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nurmi, Jari-Erik. 2004. “Socialization and Self-development: Channelling, Selection, Adjustment and Reflection.” In Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, ed. by Richard M. Lerner, and Laurence Steinberg, 85–124. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olekalns, Mara, and Paul L. Smith. 2000. “Understanding Optimal Outcomes: The Role of Strategy Sequences in Competitive Negotiations.” Human Communication Research 26: 527–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Page, Ruth, Johann Wolfgang Unger, David Barton, and Michele Zappavigna. 2014. Researching the Language and Social Media: A Student Guide. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pipher, Mary. 1994. Reviving Ophelia: Saving the Selves of Adolescent Girls. New York: G.P. Putnam and Sons.Google Scholar
Rainie, Lee, and Paul Hitlin. 2005. The Internet at School. Washington D.C.: PEW Internet and American Life.Google Scholar
Reinmann, Cordula. 2001. “Engendering the Field of Conflict Management: Why Gender does not Matter! Thoughts from a Theoretical Perspective.” Bradford: University of Bradford. Peace Studies Papers. Fourth series: Working paper 2.2.
Rigby, Ken. 2003. Addressing Bullying in Schools: Theory and Practice. Australian Institute of Criminology: Canberra.Google Scholar
Ringrose, Jessica. 2008. “‘Just be friends’: Exposing the Limits of Educational Bully Discourses for Understanding Teen Girls’ Heterosexualized Friendships and Conflicts.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 29 (5): 509–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Sluts, Whore, Fat Slags and Playboy Bunnies: Teen Girls’ Negotiations of ‘Sexy’ on Social Networking Sites and at School.” In Girls and Education, ed. by Carolyn Jackson, Carrie Paechter, and Emma Renold, 170–182. Basingstoke: Open University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Russell, Matthew A. 2011. Mining the Social Web: Analyzing Data from Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Other Social Media Sites. Sebastapol: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
Serpa, Sandro, and Carlos M. Ferreira. 2018. “Goffman‘s Backstage Revisited: Conceptual Relevance in Contemporary Social Interactions.” International Journal of Social Science Studies 6 (10): 74–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigelman, Lee. 2001. “The Presentation of Self in Presidential Life: Onstage and Backstage with Johnson and Nixon.” Political Communication 18 (1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silvester, Joanne, Fiona M. Anderson-Gough, Neil R. Anderson, and Afandi R. Mohamed. 2002. “Locus of Control, Attributions and Impression Management in the Selection Interview.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 75: 59–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Angela. 2011. “Femininity Repackaged: Postfeminism and Ladette to Lady”. In Women on Screen, ed. by Melanie Waters, 153–166. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark J. 1998. E-merging Strategies of Identity: The Rhetorical Construction of Self in Personal Websites (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International 59: 4315.Google Scholar
Taylor, Paul J. 2002. “A Cylindrical Model of Communication Behaviour in Crisis Negotiations.” Human Communication Research 28: 7–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Paul. J., and Ian J. Donald. 2003. “Foundations and Evidence for an Interaction-based Approach to Conflict.” International Journal of Conflict Management 14: 213–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin. 2014. “Disciplining Youth: Language Ideologies and New Technologies.” In The Discourse Reader, ed. by Adam Jaworski, and Nikolas Coupland, 481–496. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turner, John C., Michael A. Hogg, Penelope J. Oakes, Stephen D. Reicher, and Margaret Wetherell. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vergel, Mawency, José Martínez, and Sandra Zafra. 2016. “Factores asociados al bullying en instituciones de educación superior [Factors associated to bullying in tertiary education institutions].” Revista Criminalidad 58 (2): 197–208.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Rosalind. 2002. Queen Bees and Wannabes: Helping your Daughter Survive Cliques, Gossip, Boyfriends, and other Realities of Adolescence. New York: Three Rivers Press.Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar