Chapter 4
“If it wasn’t absolutely true, it couldn’t be published”
On boundaries in collaborative journalism
Engaging audiences and collaborating with elite members
of the public (e.g. scientists) have become increasingly important in
newsrooms across the globe (Harbers
2016). In this chapter, we zoom in on collaborative journalism
(in which journalists work together with non-journalists) with a
postfoundational lens. We present a case in which a newspaper, university
and environmental government agency set up a citizen science project on air
quality in a Western European country. This chapter offers a thematic
analysis of three retrospective interviews with key players, which were
conducted at the end of seven months of ethnographic fieldwork behind the
scenes of this citizen science project. We demonstrate how collaboration
plays out in (re)defining the boundaries of the cultural spaces of media,
science and politics as they are constructed by our informants.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Media-science-politics relationship
- Mediated issue development
- Credibility contest
- The case
- Methodology
- Profiles of the interviewees
- Findings
- The journalist
- The professor
- The department head of the environmental government agency
- Conclusion
-
Notes
-
References
References (72)
References
Arnoldi, Jakob. 2007. “Universities
and the Public Recognition of
Expertise.” Minerva 45 (1): 49–61. 

Bäckstrand, Karin. 2003. “Civic
Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts,
Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental
Governance.” Global Environmental
Politics 3 (4): 24–41. 

Blommaert, Jan.2010. Language Ideological
Debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
.
Bonney, Rick, Heidi L. Ballard, Rebecca Jordan, Ellen McCallie, Tina Phillips, Jennifer L. Shirk, and Candice C. Wilderman. 2009. “Public
Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and
Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science
Education.” A CAISE Inquiry Group
Report. [URL].
Bornmann, Lutz. 2012. “Measuring
the Societal Impact of Research. Research is Less and Less Assessed
on Scientific Impact Alone - We Should Aim to Quantify the
Increasingly Important Contributions of Science to
Society.” EMBO
Reports 13 (8): 673–676. 

Boyce, Tammy. 2006. “Journalism
and Expertise.” Journalism
Studies 7 (6): 889–906. 

Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using
Thematic Analysis in
Psychology.” Qualitative Research in
Psychology 3: 77–101. 

Briggs, Charles L., and Daniel C. Hallin. 2016. Making
Health Public: How News Coverage is Remaking Media, Medicine, and
Contemporary
Life. London: Routledge. 

Bruns, Axel, and Timothy Highfield. 2012. “The
Produsage of Citizen
Journalism.” In Produsing
Theory in a Digital World: The Intersection of Audiences and
Production in Contemporary Theory, ed.
by R A Lind, 15-31. New York: Peter Lang.
Collins, Harry, and Robert Evans. 2002. “The
Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and
Experience.” Social Studies of
Science.
.
Colson, Vinciane. 2011. “Science
Blogs as Competing Channels for the Dissemination of Science
News.” Journalism 12 (7), 889–902. 

Cotter, Colleen. 2010. News
Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Curry, Alexander L., and Natalie Jomini Stroud. 2019. “The
Effects of Journalistic Transparency on Credibility Assessments and
Engagement
Intentions.” Journalism.
.
Declercq, Jana. 2018. (De)Constructing
the Discourse of Health News: A Linguistic Ethnographic
Enquiry. PhD
diss Ghent University.
Declercq, Jana, and Ricardo A. Ayala. 2017. “Examining
‘Elite’ Power Dynamics in Informant—Research Relations and its
Impact on Ethnographic Data Construction: A Case Study from
Pharmaceutical Health
Communication.” International Journal
of Qualitative
Methods 16 (1): 1–12. 

Dedman, Bill. (n.d.-a). “How
Study of Home Loans in Metro Atlanta was Carried
Out.” Accessed August 22,
2019. [URL].
Dedman, Bill. (n.d.-b). “The
Color of Money.” Accessed
August 22, 2019. [URL].
Deuze, Mark. 2005. “What
is Journalism? Professional Identity and Ideology of Journalists
Reconsidered.” Journalism 6 (4): 442–464. 

Döveling, Katrin, Anu A. Harju, and Denise Sommer. 2018. „From
Mediatized Emotion to Digital Affect Cultures: New Technologies and
Global Flows of Emotion.” Social
Media and
Society 4 (1).
.
Dunwoody, Sharon. 2012. “How
Valuable is Formal Science Training to Science
Journalists?” Comunicação e
Sociedade 6: 75. 

Fahy, Declan, and Matthew C. Nisbet. 2011. “The
Science Journalist Online: Shifting Roles and Emerging
Practices.” Journalism.
.
Finn, Jeanine Ellen. 2016. “Use
of Sources by Science News Writers: An Exploration of Information
Credibility.” [URL].
Froneman, Johannes D., and Thalyta Swanepoel. 2007. “Embedded
Journalism – More than a Conflictreporting
Issue.” Communicatio 30 (2): 24–35. 

Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. “Boundary-Work
and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and
Interests in Professional Ideologies of
Scientists.” American Sociological
Review 48 (6): 781. 

Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural
Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Contemporary
Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
.
Gold, Raymond L. 1957. “Roles
in Sociological Field
Observations.” Social
Forces 36. [URL].
Goldman, Ellen F., and Susan Swayze. 2012. “In-Depth
Interviewing with Healthcare Corporate Elites: Strategies for Entry
and Engagement.” International
Journal of Qualitative Methods.
.
Harbers, Frank. 2016. “Time
To Engage: De Correspondent’s Redefinition of Journalistic
Quality.” Digital
Journalism 4 (4): 494–511. 

Harcup, Tony, and Deidre O’Neill. 2017. “What
is News?: News Values Revisited
(Again).” Journalism
Studies 18 (12): 1470–1488. 

Heikkilä, Heikki, Risto Kunelius, and Laura Ahva. 2010. “From
Credibility to Relevance.” Journalism
Practice 4 (3): 274–284. 

Henkel, Mary. 2007. “Can
Academic Autonomy Survive in the Knowledge Society? A Perspective
from Britain.” Higher Education
Research &
Development 26 (1): 87–99. 

Hjarvard, Stig. 2017. “The
Mediatization of Society.” Nordicom
Review 29 (2): 102–131. 

Houston, Brant. 2010. “The
Future of Investigative
Journalism.” Daedalus 139 (2): 45–56. 

Irwin, Alan. 2006. “The
Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the “New” Scientific
Governance.” Social Studies of
Science 36 (2): 229–320. 

Jaspers, Jürgen. 2014. “From
Unwanted to So-Called Expertise: Ideologizing Sociolinguistics in
Mainstream Media.” Science
Communication 36 (5): 570–592. 

Knorr Cetina, Karin D. 1981. “The
Scientist as a Practical Reasoner: Introduction to a Constructivist
and Contextual Theory of
Knowledge.” The Manufacture of
Knowledge: 1–32.
.
Kullenberg, Christopher, and Dick Kasperowski. 2016. “What
is Citizen Science? - A Scientometric
Meta-Analysis.” PLoS
ONE 11 (1). . 

Lacey, Hugh. 2008. “Neutrality
in the Social Sciences: On Bhaskar’s Argument for an Essential
Emancipatory Impulse in Social
Science.” Journal for the Theory of
Social
Behaviour 27 (2–3): 213–241. 

Lefort, Claude. 1988. “Democracy
and Political Theory”. Contemporary
Sociology.
Lewis, Seth C., and Nikki Usher. 2014. “Code,
Collaboration, and the Future of Journalism: A Case Study of the
Hacks/Hackers Global
Network.” Digital
Journalism 2 (3): 383–393. 

Macgilchrist, Felicitas. 2016. “Fissures
in the Discourse-Scape: Critique, Rationality and Validity in
Post-Foundational Approaches to
CDS.” Discourse and
Society 27 (3): 262–277. 

Maeseele, Pieter. 2007. “Science
and Technology in a Mediatized and Democratized
Society.” SISSA – International
School for Advanced Studies Journal of Science Communication
ISSN: 1824–2049. [URL]. 

Maeseele, Pieter. 2011. On
News Media and Democratic Debate: Framing Agricultural Biotechnology
in Northern Belgium.” The
International Communication
Gazette 73(12): 83–105. 

Maeseele, Pieter. 2013. “On
Media and Science in Late Modern
Societies.” Communication
Yearbook 37: 155–181.
.
Maeseele, Pieter. 2015a. “Beyond
the Post-Political
Zeitgeist. “In The Routledge
Handbook of Environment and Communication, ed.
by Anders Hansen and Robert Cox, 429–443. London: Routledge.
Maeseele, Pieter. 2015b. “The
Risk Conflicts Perspective.” Bulletin
of Science, Technology &
Society 35(1–2): 44–53. 

Møller Hartley, Jannie. 2017. “When
Homo Academicus Meets Homo Journalisticus: An Inter-Field Study of
Collaboration and Conflict in the Communication of Scientific
Research.” Journalism.
.
Mortelmans, Dimitri. 2013. Handboek
kwalitatieve
onderzoeksmethoden (2nd
ed.). Leuven: Acco. [URL].
Moy, Patricia, Michael A. Xenos, and Verena K. Hess. 2005. “Communication
and Citizenship: Mapping the Political Effects of
Infotainment.” Mass Communication and
Society 8 (2): 111–131. 

Murcott, Toby H. L., and Andy Williams. 2013. “The
Challenges for Science Journalism in the
UK.” Progress in Physical
Geography 37 (2): 152–160. 

Nieminen, Hannu. 2009. “Media
in Crisis? Social, Economic and Epistemic
Dimensions.” In Communicative
Approaches to Politics and Ethics in Europe. The Intellectual Work
of the 2009 ECREA European Media and Communication Doctoral Summer
School, 129–140.
Nisbet, Matthew C., and Michael E. Huge. 2006. “Attention
Cycles and Frames in the Plant Biotechnology Debate: Managing Power
Participation Through the Press/Policy
Connection.” Harvard International
Journal of
Press/Politics 11 (2): 3–40. 

NT&T. (2011). “Towards
a Linguistics of News
Production.” Journal of
Pragmatics 43 (7): 1843–1852. 

O’Flynn, Janine L. (2009). “The
cult of Collaboration in Public Policy:
Controversy/Commentary.” Australian
Journal of Public
Administration 68 (1): 112–116. 

Pepermans, Yves, and Pieter Maeseele. 2014. “Democratic
Debate and Mediated Discourses on Climate Change: From Consensus to
De/Politicization.” Environmental
Communication 8 (2), 216–232. 

Peters, Hans Peter. 1995. “The
Interaction of Journalists and Scientific Experts: Co-Operation and
Conflict between Two Professional
Cultures.” Media, Culture &
Society 17 (1): 31–48. 

Peters, Hans Peter, Dominique Brossard, Suzanne De Cheveigné, Sharon Dunwoody, Monika Kallfass, Steve Miller, and Shoji Tsuchida. 2008. “Science
Communication: Interactions with the Mass
Media.” Science.
.
Peters, Hans Peter, Dominique Brossard, Sharon Dunwoody, Steve Miller, and Shoji Tsuchida. 2008. “Science-Media
Interface It’s Time to
Reconsider.” Science
Communication 30 (2): 266–276. 

Samuel, Gabrielle, Clare Williams, and John Gardner. 2017. “UK
Science Press Officers, Professional Vision and the Generation of
Expectations.” Public Understanding
of
Science 26 (1), 55–69. 

Schultz, Ida. 2007. “The
Journalistic Gut Feeling.” Journalism
Practice 1 (2): 190–207. 

Scott, Joan W., and Judith Butler. 1992. Feminists
Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge.
Scott, Tyler A., and Craig W. Thomas. 2017. “Winners
and Losers in the Ecology of Games: Network Position, Connectivity,
and the Benefits of Collaborative Governance
Regimes.” Journal of Public
Administration Research And
Theory: 647–660.
.
Silverstein, Michael, and Greg Urban. 1996. “Natural
Histories of
Discourse.” Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Spangenberg, Jochen, and Nicolaus Heise. 2016. “News
From the
Crowd.” In WWW
’14
Companion, 765–768.
.
Sumner, Petroc, Solveiga Vivian-Griffiths, Jacky Boivin, Andrew Williams. 2014. “The
Association between Exaggeration in Health Related Science News and
Academic Press Releases: Retrospective Observational
Study.” BMJ (Clinical Research
Ed.) 349.
.
Tuosto, Kylie. 2008. “The
“Grunt Truth” of Embedded Journalism: The New Media/Military
Relationship.” Stanford Journal of
International
Relations X (1): 20–31. [URL].
Van Praet, Ellen. 2005. “Strategy
and Ritual in Institutional Encounters: A Linguistic Ethnography of
Weekly Meetings in the British Embassy in
Brussels.” Ghent: Ghent University, Faculty of Arts and Philosophy. [URL].
Weingart, Peter. 1998. “Science
and the Media.” Research
Policy 27: 869–879. 

Williams, Andy, and Slavko Gajevic. 2013. “Selling
Science?: Source Struggles, Public Relations, and UK Press Coverage
of Animal-Human Hybrid
Embryos.” Journalism
Studies 14 (4), 507–522. 

Woods, Mike. 1998. “Rethinking
Elites: Networks, Space, and Local
Politics.” Environment and Planning
A: Economy and
Space 30 (12): 2101–2119. 

Zeide, Elena J. 2005. “In
Bed with the Military: First Amendment Implications of Embedded
Journalism.” New York University Law
Review 80: 1309–1343. [URL].
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Verkest, Sofie
2024.
Negotiating interpretive power: Interpretive practices in journalist-scientist interactions.
Journalism 25:8
► pp. 1697 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.